Message Board Archives

Ok now...I AM BACK...And BENN MUST GO!!!!

 
jala 2009-07-03 18:25:06 

Serves no proper purpose in ODIs....time for Miller....or as they say..."MILLER TIME"!!! cool

 
cricketest 2009-07-03 18:26:52 

What about the Magic?
confused

 
CricketLuva4 2009-07-03 18:28:58 

In reply to cricketest

Black Magic? lol lol

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 18:31:07 

In reply to jala

Typical........drop the most economical bowler

 
CricketLuva4 2009-07-03 18:31:42 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

Captainceeeeeeeeeeeee was that....

lol lol lol

 
Fantom 2009-07-03 18:43:22 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

Typical........drop the most economical bowler

Dude, don't be an idiot. A front line bowler must take wickets. Benn does not take wickets. His economy rate would be a factor if he were bowling at 2.0 - 3.0 runs per over.

I don't agree that he should be dropped yet, but if in the next five to ten ODIs there is no improvement in strike rate (under 60) and average (under 50) then he simply 'gats to go'.

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 18:45:33 

In reply to Fantom

who de hell goes for 2 and 3 in ODi's?

Ansa now idiot!

 
imusic 2009-07-03 18:46:13 

In reply to jala
How bout those mentally superior yardies jala... lol

 
WestDem 2009-07-03 18:50:38 

In reply to jala

Benn can go and take de Cappo and Taylor with him... Total Waste of space.... lol lol lol

 
SocaFighter 2009-07-03 18:53:05 

Have respect the best captain since Clive Lloyd....says Holding... rolleyes

 
matchstick 2009-07-03 18:53:46 

In reply to jala

i think i on de waggon too...

had enuff of benn... mainly cuz it seems like he tryin to blame everyone else for him not picking up wickets... not good for the team!

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 18:55:06 

In reply to matchstick

Is this an attempt to avoid blqming Captaincee for the loss

 
Fantom 2009-07-03 19:07:53 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

That is my point!!! Benn's economy rate is nothing special. Certainly not good enough for him to be kept in the team on the basis of his economy rate which is 4.82 per over after this match.

To put the above in perspective, if every bowler has that economy rate, WI will be chasing 300 runs per game.

Wouldn't it be better to pick a batsman who could help chase down that total?

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 19:12:01 

In reply to Fantom

Play 11 batsmen nuh.....whenever we pack batting we lose. It should be up to the top 6 to make whatever is required

 
googley 2009-07-03 19:12:45 

In reply to jala where you been? banwass? lol

 
Fantom 2009-07-03 19:19:58 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

And, we will keep losing if we pick a frontline bowler who cannot even average one wicket per game and whose economy rate is north of 3.00 runs per over.

Unless there is some improvement soon, Benn will be a FROLBINO.

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 19:22:53 

In reply to Fantom

first yuh matn bad. If every bowler wqas at 4.82 the score would be less than 250.

But what is the economy rate of the other frontline bowlers?

 
Fantom 2009-07-03 19:31:01 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

Bad math conceded, Fuzzy.

The point is that the others take wickets and so ease the pressure off WI when fielding. Benn doesn't offer that. Benn needs to start taking wickets and should have another five to ten ODIs and maybe about another five Tests to prove his worth. That is all I am saying.

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 19:32:47 

In reply to Fantom

arrite

 
jala 2009-07-03 19:38:40 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

do u know what average means to a bowler's stats....

and if yuh talking stats and rpo, go check Miller stats - wickets/rpo/ave

 
matchstick 2009-07-03 19:38:43 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

what??

 
doosra 2009-07-03 19:41:49 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

2 hodda muddie tekkin u orn tonite on the same hissue? big grin

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 19:44:41 

In reply to doosra

wunnuh obsessed wid Benn.....ok replace he wid Austin

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 19:46:30 

In reply to jala

for those who came in late, and those who do not understand. Econ is more important than Ave in limited over matches

 
doosra 2009-07-03 19:49:30 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

jala was told eons ago that Benn is no good, he just didnt listen...some men love to see it with their own eyes...

 
jala 2009-07-03 19:51:55 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

ok..say u r right re: econ. rate..what would u say if Miller has a better rpo than Benn...????

Benn = 4.82

Miller = 4.57


plus miller has 14 wickets from 15 matches..........



u and your "fuzzy" math

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 19:53:23 

In reply to jala

Jesus loves u too!

Has Miller recovered from injury?

4.82 4.57 whats the diff

 
jala 2009-07-03 20:06:20 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

what's de difference???????

bannuh u does mek me laugh...lol

u started the rpo argument and when a present de facts yuh asking bout difference?

de difference is that Miller own better dan Benn....Benn has played his last ODI series lol

 
FuzzyWuzzy 2009-07-03 20:11:50 

In reply to jala

dasalright all good tings must come to an end.

241 vs 229 if u think das a big difference

 
Narper 2009-07-03 20:23:00 

In reply to doosra

Weh Idi?

Does IDI get ANYTHING right?

Anybody keeping tabs? big grin

 
Narper 2009-07-03 20:25:06 

In reply to jala

de difference is that Miller own better dan Benn....Benn has played his last ODI series


As long Dysoon around Benn plays

Fariners in love wid he height big grin

 
jala 2009-07-04 12:58:25 

In reply to Narper

lol

Honestly...Benn does not inspire confidence in ODIs

 
doosra 2009-07-04 12:59:48 

In reply to Narper

Idi is the king of junk picks...and he actually believes he's good at picking... big grin