Serves no proper purpose in ODIs....time for Miller....or as they say..."MILLER TIME"!!! 
Message Board Archives
Ok now...I AM BACK...And BENN MUST GO!!!!
2009-07-03 18:25:06
2009-07-03 18:26:52
What about the Magic?
2009-07-03 18:28:58
In reply to cricketest
Black Magic? 
2009-07-03 18:31:07
In reply to jala
Typical........drop the most economical bowler
2009-07-03 18:31:42
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
Captainceeeeeeeeeeeee was that....
2009-07-03 18:43:22
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
Typical........drop the most economical bowler
Dude, don't be an idiot. A front line bowler must take wickets. Benn does not take wickets. His economy rate would be a factor if he were bowling at 2.0 - 3.0 runs per over.
I don't agree that he should be dropped yet, but if in the next five to ten ODIs there is no improvement in strike rate (under 60) and average (under 50) then he simply 'gats to go'.
2009-07-03 18:45:33
In reply to Fantom
who de hell goes for 2 and 3 in ODi's?
Ansa now idiot!
2009-07-03 18:46:13
In reply to jala
How bout those mentally superior yardies jala...
2009-07-03 18:50:38
In reply to jala
Benn can go and take de Cappo and Taylor with him... Total Waste of space....
2009-07-03 18:53:05
Have respect the best captain since Clive Lloyd....says Holding... 
2009-07-03 18:53:46
In reply to jala
i think i on de waggon too...
had enuff of benn... mainly cuz it seems like he tryin to blame everyone else for him not picking up wickets... not good for the team!
2009-07-03 18:55:06
In reply to matchstick
Is this an attempt to avoid blqming Captaincee for the loss
2009-07-03 19:07:53
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
That is my point!!! Benn's economy rate is nothing special. Certainly not good enough for him to be kept in the team on the basis of his economy rate which is 4.82 per over after this match.
To put the above in perspective, if every bowler has that economy rate, WI will be chasing 300 runs per game.
Wouldn't it be better to pick a batsman who could help chase down that total?
2009-07-03 19:12:01
In reply to Fantom
Play 11 batsmen nuh.....whenever we pack batting we lose. It should be up to the top 6 to make whatever is required
2009-07-03 19:12:45
In reply to jala where you been? banwass?
2009-07-03 19:19:58
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
And, we will keep losing if we pick a frontline bowler who cannot even average one wicket per game and whose economy rate is north of 3.00 runs per over.
Unless there is some improvement soon, Benn will be a FROLBINO.
2009-07-03 19:22:53
In reply to Fantom
first yuh matn bad. If every bowler wqas at 4.82 the score would be less than 250.
But what is the economy rate of the other frontline bowlers?
2009-07-03 19:31:01
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
Bad math conceded, Fuzzy.
The point is that the others take wickets and so ease the pressure off WI when fielding. Benn doesn't offer that. Benn needs to start taking wickets and should have another five to ten ODIs and maybe about another five Tests to prove his worth. That is all I am saying.
2009-07-03 19:32:47
In reply to Fantom
arrite
2009-07-03 19:38:40
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
do u know what average means to a bowler's stats....
and if yuh talking stats and rpo, go check Miller stats - wickets/rpo/ave
2009-07-03 19:38:43
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
what??
2009-07-03 19:41:49
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
2 hodda muddie tekkin u orn tonite on the same hissue? 
2009-07-03 19:44:41
In reply to doosra
wunnuh obsessed wid Benn.....ok replace he wid Austin
2009-07-03 19:46:30
In reply to jala
for those who came in late, and those who do not understand. Econ is more important than Ave in limited over matches
2009-07-03 19:49:30
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
jala was told eons ago that Benn is no good, he just didnt listen...some men love to see it with their own eyes...
2009-07-03 19:51:55
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
ok..say u r right re: econ. rate..what would u say if Miller has a better rpo than Benn...????
Benn = 4.82
Miller = 4.57
plus miller has 14 wickets from 15 matches..........
u and your "fuzzy" math
2009-07-03 19:53:23
In reply to jala
Jesus loves u too!
Has Miller recovered from injury?
4.82 4.57 whats the diff
2009-07-03 20:06:20
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
what's de difference???????
bannuh u does mek me laugh...lol
u started the rpo argument and when a present de facts yuh asking bout difference?
de difference is that Miller own better dan Benn....Benn has played his last ODI series
2009-07-03 20:11:50
In reply to jala
dasalright all good tings must come to an end.
241 vs 229 if u think das a big difference
2009-07-03 20:23:00
In reply to doosra
Weh Idi?
Does IDI get ANYTHING right?
Anybody keeping tabs?
2009-07-03 20:25:06
In reply to jala
de difference is that Miller own better dan Benn....Benn has played his last ODI series
As long Dysoon around Benn plays
Fariners in love wid he height
2009-07-04 12:58:25
In reply to Narper
Honestly...Benn does not inspire confidence in ODIs
2009-07-04 12:59:48
In reply to Narper
Idi is the king of junk picks...and he actually believes he's good at picking...