The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Message Board Archives

What Lara said before Hughes passing

 
Narper 2014-11-27 00:18:45 

Lara hopes Hughes’ injury doesn’t provoke knee-jerk response

Brian Lara hopes there will be no wider implications for the future of fast bowling in the wake of Phillip Hughes’ injury. Hughes remains in a critical condition in a Sydney hospital after being hit on the head by a short ball from Sean Abbott during South Australia’s Sheffield Shield clash with New South Wales at the Sydney Cricket Ground on Tuesday.

The 25-year-old underwent emergency surgery to relieve pressure on his brain and specialists are awaiting the results of further scans before giving any updates about his condition.

West Indies legend Lara says his first thoughts are obviously with Hughes, but he hopes people will understand the accident was a rare occurrence as well as being a reminder cricket has always been a dangerous sport.
“It’s very unfortunate, batsmen face all sorts of dangers, we can just pray for him,” Lara said in an interview with the Sky Sports Network.

“I know all of Australia and all of the cricketing world are praying he comes back to play and to full health. “I think it’s a sport and you are always going to have that element of risk. This is an unfortunate and rare situation.

“I felt safe playing, but there was that element of risk. I used to say a little prayer in the morning and just hope for the best.”

Lara recalls being hit on the head a couple of times during his career, by Glenn McGrath and Shoaib Akhtar, but he says facing short bowling is part of the game and something he does not want to see disappear from the sport.

“I think they'’ve done their best over the years to curb it and manage it as best as possible,” he added.

“But it’s part of a fast bowler’s armoury and it’s very hard to take that totally away from them. There are some batsmen who feed on that sort of attack and I don’t really believe it’s anything that should affect fast bowlers and the rules governing that.”

.”


Link

 
InHindsight 2014-11-27 03:32:22 

In reply to Narper

I agree with Lara. What shud change is the coaching manual.

In fact in the era od Viv and even before during fierce fast bowling was at a crescendo no one died, did any? The game would be severely dilute were the bouncer rule be further restricted. I have a 14 year old who aspires to the top in the game.

 
Pacy 2014-11-27 03:41:22 

In reply to InHindsight

What should be called for is to improve the Equipment. Game cannot be altered.

I am more worried about the umpires of late. With increasing power and straight hits Umpires are in grave danger without any protective gear. All are making fun of Umpires running around but again they will become serious only when one of the Umpires get hit or injured seriouly.

 
OZGOD 2014-11-27 06:14:31 

In reply to Pacy

I agree with Lara. Removing the bouncer fundamentally changes the game in favour of the batsman. If you have no way of pushing the batsman onto the back foot, they can sit on the front foot and drive all the time. We've all marvelled at watching great batsmen take on short pitched fast bowling. We've seen the likes of King Viv do it to the likes of Thommo and Lillee without a helmet. We saw Brian Close at the age of 40-odd face down Michael Holding and the rest of the four prong at Old Trafford doing the same, taking blow after blow to his body and narrowly avoid getting hit on his bare head. It's been part of the fabric of the game since WG Grace hooked some fast bowler to the boundary a century and change ago.

The problem with the equipment issue is that it wasn't his helmet that failed to protect him. It's nearly impossible for a helmet to protect the neck area as the batsman's head needs to be able to swivel and rotate, and duck and weave if necessary. Once you restrict movement in that area you actually increase the chances they will not be able to react fast enough to avoid the ball. Maybe they can develop something with technology the way it is these days, that will protect the neck yet not limit movement.

This is ultimately something that all players, be they bowlers or bouncers, will need mental strength to deal with. Regardless of whether they knew Phil or not, one of their own has died on a cricket field from getting hit by a ball. As a bowler, do you now hesitate from bowling bouncers when you know that's an important part of your arsenal and you have done it thousands of times with no ill effects on the batsman? As a batsman, will you be hesitant playing the pull shot when you may have done it a thousand times before with success? Those are questions every cricket player will be pondering over in the coming days.

 
Runs 2014-11-27 06:30:03 

In reply to OZGOD

Well said

 
SpudsMcKenzie 2014-11-27 07:13:34 

In reply to OZGOD

He was hit on the back of the neck???????????????

@RMc@

 
Runs 2014-11-27 07:15:14 

In reply to SpudsMcKenzie

Compressed artery resulting in brain hemorrhage. cool

 
OZGOD 2014-11-27 07:19:59 

In reply to SpudsMcKenzie

He was hit on the base of the neck, on the side, blunt force trauma which caused a vertebral artery dissection leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage. In layman's terms the artery split resulting in a massive bleed into his brain. It's a very rare occurrence, only 100 ever reported.

It's just the confluence of remote probabilities...the ball was slower than he expected, it was 135ks, he was through with the shot before the ball got to him and as a result the side of his neck was exposed when the ball got to him. A tragic accident. cry

 
SpudsMcKenzie 2014-11-27 09:10:27 

In reply to OZGOD

It's just the confluence of remote


HUH??

Stop swearing at the jamaicans on this board, mate.

@RMc@

 
nitro 2014-11-27 10:44:59 

I don't agree, short pitched bowling adds nothing to the game, it does not take any great skill. Intimidatory bowling should be a thing of the past.

 
Elsie 2014-11-27 11:26:20 

In reply to nitro
Not at all Nitro….. Good bowling fundamentals dictate that you generally bowl to the batsman's perceived weakness.

If the perception is that a player is uncomfortable with short pitched deliveries, the bowler will use it as a weapon to dismiss him...not to harm him.

As OZGOD described...the injury to Hughes was an unusual occurrence, and should not affect the way the game is played.

Hughes may have been an exception; but most batsmen who are hit in the head, are hit because they take their eyes off the ball too soon... You will recall Sarwan’s incident during the 2003 World Cup

RIP Phillip Hughes…..


sad sad

 
imusic 2014-11-27 11:26:59 

In reply to nitro

I don't agree

A shocking statement coming from you