Message Board Archives

HAVE A MEETING WITH BRAVO ??

Me thinks that they may have recognized
that they were on Quicksand . It seems
that they recognized this , and wanted
things to cool down .

Let me again state an undeniable fact .

BRAVO CAN CLAIM THAT HIS INTEMPERATE

REMARK WAS AS A RESULT OF CAMERON

LYING ABOUT BRAVO HAVING AN A

CONTRACT.


CAMERON ON THE OTHER HAND HAS NO

EXCUSE OR STATING THAT BRAVO HAD AN A

CONTRACT .

Now this is compounded by the fact that Cameron Lied regarding the 20%
fee in the matter with Pollard , which preceded the matter with Bravo .

This can be cited in a Court Case , as it demonstrates that Cameron Lied on
two occasions . I would not be surprise if Bravo's Lawyer states that
it seems that Cameron is a compulsive Liar .

My take when everything is distilled is that Bravo can state that what his intemperate outburst was caused by the
Lie that Cameron stated regarding what Contract he had .

What excuse Cameron can state for saying that Bravo had an A, Contract
when that was not true . Remember this is shortly after the matter with Pollard , in which Cameron Lied , and both Cricket Australia & Cricket South
Africa & the General Public are all aware of the fact that Cameron Lied .






.

In reply to POINT

I am not too familiar with the legal mumbo jumbo thing but can DC mek this into a personal thing and file a lawsuit against Bravo?

In reply to WestDem

Bravo as I have stated can claim to be incensed by Cameron's remarks , Bravo can also claim that he could have gone
to the IPL , but did not do that , and
to see that despite his sacrifice of
sticking with Test Cricket , he was
treated with scant respect .

Look I really do not view this as a complicated matter , Cameron is the person who caused Bravo to be incensed , and called Cameron a Big Idiot .

I am amazed that many here are focusing on what Bravo stated , while
totally ignoring what Cameron stated
which caused Bravo to call Cameron a
Big Idiot . I do not believe that calling Cameron a Big Idiot , is on the same level as cursing Dirty Words .
It is indeed very interesting that ALL the focus is on what Bravo stated , rather than the fact that Cameron lied in the matter with Pollard & then lied about Bravo's Contract .

The fact in my opinion is that regardless of Cameron's position in
the WICBC , that is not nor can it ever be an excuse for Cameron Lying about Bravo's Contract .

Evidently the WICBC is now trying to make nice with Bravo . The Emperors in
the WICBC only do things like this when they find themselves in a Sticky
Wicket .

My guess is that the Emperors are
only condescending because they believe that they were in a weak
position .In addition , I believe that they realize that they are on
quicksand . Hence their entreaties to have a conversation with Bravo .

The People in the WICBC have never ever been known to condescend to Players , there must be a reason why they are now essentially grovelling .

My take is that Bravo needs to be very very careful , the adage :

" ONCE BITTEN TWICE SHY "

Should be taken into consideration ,
It is very likely that they are playing nice to Bravo , and once he
agrees to their terms , they swiftly
fire him at the least infraction .

What happened to Phil Simmons is an
example of what I believe may befall
Bravo , who needs to get the best Legal Advice to ensure that he is not
swiftly jettisoned by the WICBC .

If Bravo agrees to return , He needs
to have his Contract not only clear & unambiguous , but he fully understands what it is that he is
Signing .His Lawyer , in my opinion must be in attendance at every meeting he has with the Emperors in the WICBC .