Typical English arrogance.http://www.skysports.com/cricket/news/14265/10705904/100-greatest-cricketers-and-number-one-is-wg-grace
Message Board Archives
Hundred greatest cricketers
In reply to bajan261
No Malcolm Marshall?
In reply to Runs
Marshall is at #34
Underwood makes the list before Lance Gibbs?
Roberts & Garner should be on that list.
Lance also.
Since he includes FC stats, Nikita Miller should entrenched somewhere within that hundred.
Sir Viv Richards should be the number one batsman and Imran Khan should be in the list.
In reply to bajan261what total from this English man. W C Grace? Now come on. This fat lump of man, Who would never stood a chance a great the fast bowlers what the West Indies had or the Aussies, even Frank larwood, who was very Quick. He would never stand a chance.Here is a man who did not obey the rules of cricket, when he out he stood his ground, and even walk back to pitch. This guy needs his brains tested.
Fazeer Mohamed spoke about writing our own...
can't expect favors when others are writing.
In reply to londoner
He also played when wickets were nowhere as good as they are today and is responsible for much of today's batting technique
It is his subjective list, but how do you Mikey Holding but you dont have Joel Garner. Not only was Joel slightly better than Mikey in test cricket, but he was a great ODI bowler.
Both of them should be on the list.
Most of them are from the stone ages and dark days of cricket..worthless!
[b]In reply to Khaga[/b
Haha haha ha no injuns
So, Steyn is 48 and Ambrose is 80????
Search
Live Scores
- no matches