Court on Earth would listen to any
Legal argument on my behalf to be
unbanned.
Message Board Archives
If I, Yadi, break the rules of CC.com no
In the world of Employment, every employeeI
is required to be subordinate to the entire
Chain of command that forms the hirachy of
that particular private organizationI.
In reply to Yadi
There is no Democracy here, this site is like NK.
Piss off Jung IL and you're gone.
Every sports club has a constitution .....
or some kind of mission statement that expresses
both expected code of conduct and the manner in
which members will contribute to the uplifting of
of all human kind.
In reply to black
No, absolutely NOT in this matter.
In reply to black
Absolutely NO employee gets away
with publicly insulting the individual
whose signiture is required for them
to be able to cash their check.
In reply to black
If these agreements are null & void
then there would be no incentive to
aspire to be the head of any institution.
In reply to Yadi
with publicly insulting the individual
whose signiture is required for them
to be able to cash their check.
True.
In reply to black
If these agreements are null & void
then there would be no incentive to
aspire to be the head of any institution.
In reply to Yadi
If u get ban and u hire me as your lawyer and pay the right amt I will 100% guarantee your reinstatement
In reply to Yadi
So the Employer has the authority to
state a lie , regarding Employees
Contracts .
Let me once again state the fact that on two occasions the Employer , was
untruthful regarding Pollard & Bravo .
Let me make it easier for you to respond , You can either state YES or
NO , in response :
WAS THE EMPLOYER STATEMENT RIGHT
REGARDING THE 20% FEE IN POLLARD'S
CONTRACT ???- YES OR NO .
WAS THE EMPLOYER STATEMENT CORRECT
WHEN THE EMPLOYER STATED THAT BRAVO
PREVIOUSLY HAD AN A - LEVEL CONTRACT
??? YES OR NO .
I just want you to simplify your answer by stating either Yes or No to
these two questions .
.
In reply to POINT
Yes & no.
In reply to POINT
The employer spoke according to the data handed
to him ... at the time.
In reply to POINT
However, the data was erroneous.
In reply to POINT
Of course NO
In reply to Chrissy
BINGO !!
I love giving Yadi Rope to hang himself . Obviously he knows that it is either one or the other , his answer is YES & NO .
Then he mentions that what I stated
is erroneous , without factually providing evidence to the contrary .
He can seek solace in the fact that many here & in the Region think like him . Never mind the fact that they are all wrong .
In reply to POINT
You do have a "Point".
In reply to Yadi
I sincerely hope that to use a Native
American term You are not "Speaking with Forked Tongue ".
Or perhaps a Saul on the road to Damascus conversion . Go in Peace ,
and look deeply into the fact that 87
years have passed , yet the People in
the WICBC , LIKE SMALL kIDS , are
adamantly clinging to their Security
Blanket , their current Structure ,
that is utterly devoid of:
TRANSPARENCY; ACCOUNTABILITY ; & GOOD
GOVERNANCE . IT ALLOWS THEM TO DO
WHATEVER THEY WANT WITH IMPUNITY .
What up Yadi?
Search
Live Scores
- no matches