The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Message Board Archives

So the Supreme Court of India removed

 
Chrissy 2017-01-03 15:25:40 

Thakur and Shirke from their top BCCI posts

CCJ - get your act together. Run them.

 
POINT 2017-01-03 16:04:33 

In reply to Chrissy

It is about time that they do that . I
really am amused when the Lackeys of the WICBC in this Forum talk about the
WICBC being a Private Entity , as if
that makes it immune from being hauled
into Court .

Frankly I do not think that the WICBC
stands even the Ghost of a Chance in
any Court in the Region . Especially since it has commissioned several Reports , and bluntly refused to implement the salient features of the various Reports it commissioned .

Clinging like toddlers to their Security Blanket , the WICBC is clinging to its 1929 Structure , that
allows it to be Not Transparent ; Not
Accountable ; and do not have to exercise Good Governance .

WE will see what the WEHBY REPORT has
to say , regarding the 87 years old
Structure of the WICBC . Interestingly during the course of verbally slapping around the officials of the BCCI ; the Supreme
Court of India made it very clear to the BCCI that :

"THEY DO NOT OWN CRICKET IN INDIA

THEY ARE MERELY THE STEWARDS OF

CRICKET IN INDIA ". THIS ALSO APPLIES

TO THE WICBC .

I recall that in the Patterson Report
it was stated that the WICBC could not OWN a Public Sport . It is in my
opinion that the WICBC be put in its
place , and that it is spelled out to its Members that it must adhere to

TRANSPARENCY ; ACCOUNTABILITY & GOOD

GOVERNANCE ; THESE THINGS MUST BE IN

THE MISSION STATEMENT OF THE WICBC &

THE REGIONAL BOARDS WHEN THEY ARE

RESTRUCTURED .

In my opinion dealing only with the
WICBC and not having the Regional Boards adhere to the above would be like putting a Plaster over Cancer that has broken the skin .

 
openning 2017-01-03 16:23:46 

In reply to Chrissy

I am not a lawyer, but can any court in the region, get any Limited company to restructure?

I am aware that any board member can be charge with various crimes, we've witnessed that with FIFA
ICC directors can also be charged with various crimes, but can any court get it or its members to restructure?

 
Courtesy 2017-01-03 16:28:13 

Chrissy, why are you so foolish?...the CCJ is a limited Appellate Court which also interprets and rules over matters relating to the Treaty of Chaguaramas.

BTW, Happy New Year darling.

big grin

 
Khaga 2017-01-03 16:30:55 

In reply to Courtesy

Powder puff?

 
Chrissy 2017-01-03 16:32:37 

In reply to Courtesy

You think I don't know all there is to know about the CCJ?
Big loud stewwwwwwwwwps.

 
Courtesy 2017-01-03 16:33:08 

In reply to Khaga

Powder puff?


Wha dat, Chrissy or de CCJ?

big grin

 
Courtesy 2017-01-03 16:34:02 

In reply to Chrissy

You think I don't know all there is to know about the CCJ?
Big loud stewwwwwwwwwps.

So why post this silly lead? You tink everyone here stoooopid like you?

Anyway, stop making yourself look stoooopid and in the process luring another skunt to idiocy.

big grin

 
rubberd 2017-01-03 18:27:18 

In reply to Courtesy

the CCJ is an Appellate Court.


The Shanique Myrie case against Barbados disproves your point.

 
Courtesy 2017-01-03 18:42:13 

In reply to rubberd

The Shanique Myrie case against Barbados disproves your point.


What??...the point that the CCJ is a limited Appellate Court?

The Barbados government was arguing that it had a right to refuse entry of Shanique and indeed other Caricom Nationals...this is in essence why the CCJ got involved in the matter... to rule on Article 45 & 46 of the treaty.

The CCJ has a mandate to give an interpretation on what Barbados interpreted as its right under the revised Treaty of Chaguaramas to refuse entry to Shanique Myrie.

In short, this fell under the CCJ's Appellate Court (mandate) jurisdiction...

...the interpretation of the the rules under the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas.

 
rubberd 2017-01-03 18:52:49 

In reply to Courtesy

Barbados also argued that that CCJ had no jurisdiction as there was no appeal to adjudicate.

 
Courtesy 2017-01-03 18:54:42 

In reply to rubberd

Barbados also argued that that CCJ had no jurisdiction as there was no appeal to adjudicate.

So clearly, there was an appeal from an earlier interpretation (Barbados) to adjudicate if it is deemed that the country violated the Treay of Chaguaramas. So in cases where there are disputes between member states, the CCJ is called upon to interpret the TOC and apply its rulings.

And stop being stooopid like Chrissy and her sheep (singular).

 
rubberd 2017-01-03 19:19:04 

In reply to Courtesy

The case being put is that sometimes the CCJ will hear a "virgin" case.

 
Courtesy 2017-01-03 19:22:07 

In reply to rubberd

The case being put is that sometimes the CCJ will hear a "virgin" case.


"Virgin case"...like Caricom vs the WICB.

lol lol lol

Repeat: And stop being stooopid like Chrissy and her sheep (singular).

 
POINT 2017-01-04 16:04:17 

The Stark Truth is that the India Supreme Court of India removed the President of the BCCI ; and also the Secretary of the BCCI .

This then begs the question Why were
they removed ?????

They were removed because the BCCI
bluntly refused to implement the changes recommended by the LODHA COMMITTEE .

Obviously this flies in the face of those in this Forum who state that
Private Entities cannot be brought to
Court to answer Charges .

This Asinine Idea that Governments
cannot intervene in Cricket is a Blasted LIE perpetrated by the ICC &
ITS MEMBERS .

So let me ask this pertinent Question :
WHY WAS IT THAT THE ICC & THE WICBC

FAILED TO GO TO COURT WHEN THE

GOVERNMENT OF GUYANA TOOK THE GCB

TO COURT .

My recollection is that neither the
WICBC or the ICC put in an appearance
on behalf of the Guyana Cricket Board .
I cite this to tangibly demonstrate
that the WICBC & the ICC ; are Toothless in matters that are in a Court .

In this Forum on several occasions I
have cited the fact that :

THE PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN ON 4

SEPARATE OCCASIONS FIRED THE

PRESIDENTS OF THE PAKISTAN CRICKET

BOARD FOR MALFEASANCE .

The President on these 4 occasions
then appointed a President of the
Pakistan Cricket Board , and also an
AD HOC Committee to govern Cricket in
Pakistan , Until there were fresh Elections to become Officials of the
Pakistan Cricket Board .

 
POINT 2017-01-04 16:23:05 

It was by googling Formation of International Cricket Boards , that I found out that the President of Pakistan fired the PCB .

This folks is what made me aware that
when the ICC & the WICBC stated that
Governments must not intervene in Cricket , that was & is a blatant Lie .The only thing that Governments cannot do is govern Cricket forever .

 
Courtesy 2017-01-04 17:27:53 

lol lol lol

The rantings of a raving lunatic.

 
openning 2017-01-04 17:39:42 

In reply to Courtesy

lol lol

 
Courtesy 2017-01-04 18:06:47 

In reply to openning

In de man's dossier there are over 400 posts saying the same monotonous rubbish.

lol lol lol

 
Khaga 2017-01-04 18:09:43 

In reply to Courtesy

You forgot the other 21000

 
Courtesy 2017-01-04 18:12:31 

In reply to Khaga

I had to reclaim some important storage space.

big grin

 
tc1 2017-01-04 19:12:56 

In reply to Courtesy


can u take away his posting rights.

 
openning 2017-01-04 20:51:23 

In reply to tc1

All I want from Point, is to return to the region and do the fight to restructure the WICB.
One has to be totally insane to repeat the same shoite daily.

 
Kay 2017-01-04 22:21:43 

In reply to openning

I dare you to refute anything I have been saying on this forum ... smile

 
POINT 2017-01-05 11:14:21 

JackAsses can Bray , however the TRUTH
is slapping their faces every freaking
Day . It is exceedingly asinine to suggest that I must come to the Region
to voice my criticism of the Worst
International Cricket Board in the
Commonwealth .

It gives me great pleasure in knowing
that none of the Big Idiots in this
Post can ever refute what I have stated , regarding the fact that

THE WICBC FOR DECADES HAS NOT BEEN

TRANSPARENT OR ACCOUNTABLE . IT ALSO

HAS NOT EXERCISED GOOD GOVERNANCE .

IT IS ONLY INTERESTED IN SELF

PRESERVATION ; AND ENSURING THAT ITS

87 YEARS OLD SECURITY BLANKET REMAINS

IN PLACE .


It is interesting that the Lackeys of
the WICBC here , utterly refuse to
to write about the fact that the

WICBC FOR DECADES HAVE COMMISSIONED

SEVERAL REPORTS AND BLUNTLY REFUSED

TO IMPLEMENT THE SALIENT FEATURES OF

OF THOSE REPORTS . WHAT THEN WAS THE

FREAKING PURPOSE OF COMMISSIONING

THOSE REPORTS ??????

 
Courtesy 2017-01-05 14:10:36 

Conclusion: The WICB must be hauled before the CCJ.

lol lol lol

 
gvenkat 2017-01-05 22:14:18 

In reply to Courtesy

What is CCJ? Chrissy Council of Jamaica? razz lol