What is the status on these two?
They are among the leading bowlers this Super 50, and should definitely be included in the squad, but are they "eligible" for selection?
Rampaul a Kolpak?
Didn't Taylor retire?
Message Board Archives
Rampaul & Taylor
In reply to DIEHARD
Yeh from test. Rampaul is not quick enough. We have two medium pacers already
In reply to silver
Which two medium pacers we have ..that are BETTER than Rampaul?
U can't be talking about Carlos??
Carlos can't merit selection to our ODI squad, not based on performances in any format/tournament in the last 6 months
In reply to silver
True ... I looked at him in this tournament and there is no big sting in his attack
In reply to DIEHARD
You better get used to it. Carlos and Holder are not going anywhere especially under this regime
In reply to Kay
What does bowling quick have to do with who the best fast bowler is?
Tino Best prolly the fastest bowler we ever produce in these parts..how'd that work out for him?
In reply to DIEHARD
Is this really a question?
In reply to silver
Are they not the 2 captains appointed for West Indies in all 3 formats of the cricket?
In reply to Kay
Wow..
In reply to DIEHARD
Tell de skunt!
In reply to Kay
So who yuh expect to get sting from.
In reply to DIEHARD
Rampaul, 48 overs, six matches, 14 wickets @ ave of 13.07 and ER of 3.81
Taylor, 51 overs, six matches, 13 wickets @ ave of 17.23 and ER of 4.39
Holder, 43 overs, six matches, 12 wickets @ ave of 11.58 and ER of 3.19
Carlos, six matches, 26 overs, three wickets @ ave of 34.66 and ER of 4.00
Carlos seems to be doing a Sammy...taking an ODI place but not bowling his quota of overs. We can see why!
In reply to Kay
kinda self explanatory, eh??? Fast bowler...bowling quick.. methinks there is a relationship, however convoluted.
In reply to Rastaman
Yep, rhetoric ... but he was actually asking a question hence my reply...
In reply to Rastaman
SMH...so ..the quickest bowler...is the best fast bowler?
Relevance and context
Rampaul is not quick enough
That was the statement made, that in reference to my comment that he is one of, actually, THE leading fast bowler in the tournament.
So i assume the poster is he saying he is not quick enough, to be considered the best..therefore, what i want to know is.
What he not quick enough for??
Not quick enough to be the best?
He have the most wickets, and he has consistently been among the best, everytime we look at the stats, in any tournament or tour, at any level.
So again I ask, WTF is Ravi Rampaul not quick enough for?
In reply to DIEHARD
hey, i understand, jus playing on words...maybe u could state it differently tho
In reply to Rastaman
Lol. I figured
Don't matter his figures/stats this super50. Don't think selectors will even consider him.
In reply to Starzz
Then the selectors should be replaced
Search
Live Scores
- no matches