The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Message Board Archives

9th Circuit Court blocks the Con 3-0

 
Chrissy 2017-02-09 18:16:26 

Great news

 
birdseye 2017-02-09 18:21:27 

In reply to Chrissy
Yep! great news
9th circuit reject Trump categorically - they Trump Trump
big grin big grin big grin

 
birdseye 2017-02-09 18:23:05 

They smack his ass down

 
nickoutr 2017-02-09 18:34:13 

Trump will get his way on this ... wait and see

 
Chrissy 2017-02-09 18:36:04 

In reply to birdseye

lol lol

 
Rastaman 2017-02-09 18:37:20 

he's gonna get ballastic now!!! lol

 
Chrissy 2017-02-09 18:38:23 

In reply to Rastaman

I wish he'd climb to the top of his Tower - and jump

 
Chrissy 2017-02-09 18:39:32 

His response - in uppercase

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
lol lol

 
POINT 2017-02-09 18:58:14 

In reply to Chrissy

He has already twitted " SEE YOU IN
COURT " . HE will soon get to realize
that he aint like Putin in Russia .

Unlike Putin , the American Government consists of The Administration , Congress & the Judiciary .

THE STARK FACT IS THESE ARE 3 CO

EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT .

AND ESSENTIALLY THE JUDICIARY IS THE

UMPIRE REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION

DISPUTES BETWEEN THE OTHER TWO CO

EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT .

Now if this matter goes up to the Supreme Court ; where currently there are 4 liberal Justices & 4 Conservative Justices .

Therefore if there is a deadlock 4-4
then the decision of the current Court Stands .

The fact is that Trump's Plan was hastily put together and as a result was not properly planned . He did not also bring on board relevant persons
in Congress who could have helped him craft his Plan .

THIS IS A CLASSIC CASE OF

HASTE MAKES WASTE . OR HURRY BIRD

DO NOT BUILD GOOD NEST .

 
sudden 2017-02-09 19:14:45 

Will go to Supreme Court where there is no clear cut majority

 
Rastaman 2017-02-09 19:31:34 

SEE YOU IN COURT...


So the last 2 rulings against the Yellow Dude came from some fly-by-night arbiter = "so-called" courts???
lol lol

 
Kay 2017-02-09 19:34:33 

Me think Trump gonna win dis now. Not saying why as yet.....smile

 
pelon 2017-02-09 19:37:17 

Trump will not sleep tonight.

Hits him hard to not get his way, especially publicly.... behaves like an 8 year old.

 
black 2017-02-09 19:40:28 

In reply to sudden

Justice Kennedy can go either way. He is the only unpredictable Justice on the Court.

 
DukeStreet 2017-02-09 19:52:28 

In reply to Kay
Can you imagine if the Supreme idiots rule in his favor? He would let loose on policies with impunity.

shock

 
nickoutr 2017-02-09 19:57:58 

In reply to Kay

Strategy ... like a chess game

 
Runs 2017-02-09 19:58:52 

Bad lawyers

 
POINT 2017-02-09 20:09:31 

So let me be crystal clear . there are currently 8 judges on the USA Supreme Court . If when this cases goes before
the Supreme Court , there are 4 Liberal Judges & 4 Conservative Judges .
Therefore in the even there is a 4-4
Vote . In the Supreme Court ,

THE DECISION BY THIS CURRENT COURT

WILL STAND IN THE EVENT OF A TIE.

 
Chrissy 2017-02-09 20:20:57 

In reply to POINT

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh -leff dem

 
black 2017-02-09 20:26:43 

In reply to POINT

Judge Kennedy is not a liberal Judge, he can just as easily side with conservatives on this case.

 
openning 2017-02-09 20:37:55 

He soon get a heart attack

 
embsallie 2017-02-09 20:53:39 

In reply to sudden

Will go to Supreme Court where there is no clear cut majority


Refer to Point's post above for the answer.

 
embsallie 2017-02-09 21:04:22 

Amateurs at work in the White House.

Trump is at sea when it comes to understanding how a democratic Government works.

He is however surrounded by ass kissers who probably should know better but choose to give him bad advice or are too afraid to tell Trump when he is wrong.
Either way that does not bode well for his Presidency.

The problem with Trump is that he never admits that he is wrong, nor does he take responsibility for anything going awry.

So who would want to work for someone like this when he is prepared to accept - every time - someone jumps under a semi truck for him.

Case in point: Newly appointed Kelly of the Homeland Security who took full responsibility for Trump's ill thought and poorly implemented action with that executive order on Travel Ban.

 
bravos 2017-02-09 21:35:15 

In reply to Chrissy

I wish he'd climb to the top of his Tower - and jump


smile twisted cool

 
black 2017-02-09 22:43:40 

In reply to embsallie

You are absolutely right. Trump should have waited for the Attorney General to be confirmed and in place before taking such action.

 
black 2017-02-09 23:41:06 

In reply to POINT

My apologies to you, Stephen Breyer is the liberal Justice I was forgetting.

I know the ladies well. lol

 
Walco 2017-02-10 03:37:08 

In reply to sudden

The US Supreme Court will affirm the 9th Circuit by a 6-2 vote, with only Thomas and Alito siding with Trump.

 
Chrissy 2017-02-10 05:41:24 

In reply to embsallie

Correct

 
nick2020 2017-02-10 06:52:27 

In reply to Chrissy

The supreme court will not go with a voter base just because.

I do not expect it to be even close

 
camos 2017-02-10 08:14:53 

the high court will not hear the case!

 
Chrissy 2017-02-10 09:58:24 

In reply to camos

My thinking too

 
black 2017-02-10 10:26:07 

In reply to camos

the high court will not hear the case!


I don't think they have a choice on matters as important as this. This is just a temporary ruling, Trump will challenge the lower court's decision and appeal to the Supreme Court, if the ruling is against him.

 
camos 2017-02-10 10:32:06 

In reply to black
all rulings so far are against,there is no judge siding with the ban.

 
black 2017-02-10 10:38:07 

In reply to camos

The ruling itself is not against the ban, it's a temporary stay.

 
Tryangle 2017-02-10 11:48:59 

In reply to Chrissy

It would be awesome TV if Trump actually did 'see them in court'. Can you imagine the judge telling him he's out of order and the reaction?

 
pelon 2017-02-10 12:08:51 

In reply to camos

the high court will not hear the case!
Agreed. 2-1 maybe then... but a 3-0 is not leaving any room for appeal - and it would be politically risky to LOSE a high court case this early in your tenure.

Secondly, this will force an alternative "Immigration ban" - that which we would hope will seek counsel outside of the brain of Rudy Giuliani.
However with the team around him/Bannon etc. I don't expect anything other than what we've seen before.

 
nick2020 2017-02-10 12:20:30 

In reply to pelon

and it would be politically risky to LOSE a high court case this early in your tenure.


He tweeted he will see them in court. He is between a rock and a hard place now.

 
cherri 2017-02-10 12:21:20 

In reply to Chrissy

He need to cayh he so-an-so.....the only thing/person America need protection against is he..........

twisted evil

 
Runs 2017-02-10 12:30:54 

In reply to cherri

razzShot ball lost

 
Chrissy 2017-02-10 14:54:28 

In reply to cherri

Correct is right