The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Message Board Archives

ANDRE RUSSELL IN A SPOT OF BOTHER AGAIN!

 
XDFIX 2017-03-09 01:32:31 

Link Text

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 01:42:51 

In reply to XDFIX

Some Jamaicans I tell you. Just want to make a name for themselves and get a pat on the back in the process. Just love to tear each other down and thus look at where the country is at now. Tief nuh love fi tief wid long bag.

 
Larr Pullo 2017-03-09 04:38:44 

It's a way to give JADCO teeth. So that athletes wouldn't flaunt the rules, just because it's JADCO. You all KNOW that's why Russell was ignoring them.

Way to go JADCO! Let these athletes know that you are a force to be reckoned with, and away with that flag card!!!

The reason why the entire Caribbean is in a mess is because people think that they don't have to follow rules!!!

 
Halliwell 2017-03-09 05:22:35 

In reply to Larr Pullo

The last paragraph
Co-sign

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 05:45:51 

We have mind readers on here.

The reason the Caribbean is in a mess is because some people like to throw their weight around to feel like their the big man.

Why should Russell receive a longer ban than a guy who used anabolic steroids (Tyson Gay). A 1 year ban is enough. An don't come with that apples and oranges BS.

Vindictive pieces of shyte.

 
Larr Pullo 2017-03-09 05:54:55 

In reply to JahJah

Does Tyson Gay fall under the sphere of control of JADCO?

 
Pacy 2017-03-09 06:10:06 

In reply to Larr Pullo

Do you think a person using steroids should get a lesser penalty against an issue of negligence?

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 06:12:35 

In reply to Pacy

The guy asks that question after I said not come with that apples and oranges BS. rolleyes

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 06:14:47 

In reply to Pacy

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/athletics/5328420.stm

Ohuruogu is hit by one-year ban

England's Commonwealth 400m champion Christine Ohuruogu has been given a one-year ban for missing three out-of-competition drug tests.


1 year is enough punishment.

I wonder if the desired 2 years is because of this.

 
methodic 2017-03-09 06:39:18 

In reply to JahJah

is Jadco Jamaicans living in Jamaica? They looking for a bribe or something or what? Them trying to hurt people man. This can't make sense.

 
Drapsey 2017-03-09 07:46:09 

Leave JADCO alone and let them exercise their given power.

What would be the use of their having all that power if they're not going to use it, even abuse it as is their prerogative?

 
JoeGrine 2017-03-09 08:55:49 

In reply to JahJah


Why should Russell receive a longer ban than a guy who used anabolic steroids (Tyson Gay). A 1 year ban is enough. An don't come with that apples and oranges BS.


Apples and apples or oranges and oranges really. Two years maximum is the prescribed punishment.

 
jen 2017-03-09 09:20:44 

In reply to Larr Pullo

I agree with you, that's like when Vybez Kartel on murder charge, people ah say free the world boss just cause he ah star. I don't know whether he guilty or not, but saying free a man just cause he ah star is why the world will always be full of crime, violence and corruption.

Aint know different than whites in america committing crimes and getting less or no punishment compare to blacks doing the something.

 
cricketmygame 2017-03-09 10:02:14 

In reply to Larr Pullo

yes. I think Jamaica lost a gold medal recently because of doping so you cant blame them

 
methodic 2017-03-09 10:31:42 

In reply to jen

What this have to with Vybes Cartel? It was deemed by a qualified person that a year ban is sufficient.

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 10:34:50 

In reply to JoeGrine

Two years maximum is the prescribed punishment.

 
DIEHARD 2017-03-09 10:43:23 

In reply to Larr Pullo

The reason why the entire Caribbean is in a mess is because people think that they don't have to follow rules!!!


Doube cosign, see it everyday, another reason why living in this part of the world is becoming unbearable

 
XDFIX 2017-03-09 12:11:39 

Worrying days ahead!

 
jen 2017-03-09 12:12:58 

In reply to methodic

the comparison is when people ah star we want them to get away.

 
methodic 2017-03-09 12:16:53 

In reply to jen

ok, but Russell has already gotten the penalty deemed fair by a qualified committee. What is the motivation for penalizing him further.

 
Kay 2017-03-09 12:26:49 

I agree that the full two years is necessary to set a strong precedence. They are trying to deter others who may think of going this route in the future .... Russell just happens to be in the way so they have to use him

 
natty_forever 2017-03-09 12:39:39 

In reply to methodic... self importance?

 
methodic 2017-03-09 12:51:13 

In reply to natty_forever

or just plain ignorance and wickedness

 
archangel 2017-03-09 12:58:43 

The man didn't get away with anything.

He was punished.

This smacks of vindictiveness. Maybe they see that despite their ban he still was able to get contract even if he wasn't going to play.

They feel slighted and want to show that they wear heavy boots.
This action is as big of the problem as it is when you bow to favoritism like how people calling for convicted people to be released.

 
JoeGrine 2017-03-09 13:50:14 

In reply to JahJah


Two years maximum is the prescribed punishment.

As opposed to doing something without the penalty framework.

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 13:56:55 

In reply to JoeGrine

Two years is the prescribed punishment.


Two years maximum is the prescribed punishment.


The End.

 
JahJah 2017-03-09 13:58:33 

In reply to archangel

This smacks of vindictiveness. Maybe they see that despite their ban he still was able to get contract even if he wasn't going to play.


Royal Punto Finale.


The man didn't get away with anything.

He was punished.


Indeed. It is as simple as that.

Say it again sah, because so many are so blind. They are acting like he somehow got away. He was already sanctioned has been stopped from playing the sport he loves. His profession.

 
JoeGrine 2017-03-09 14:17:12 

In reply to JahJah

It is not about "he somehow got away", it is about the NADO being of the view that the infringement warrants a 2year suspension and you are of the opinion that is does not. I am of course assuming you have seen the details within reasoned decision to question the NADO.

The "sport he loves" has regulations which he infringed upon, there are penalties associated with said infringement and it is the opinion of the NADO that he should receive 2 years.