http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/20752730/bad-ball-useful-ploy-attack-zampa
Message Board Archives
Bad ball a useful ploy when under attack - Zampa
In reply to doosra
The problem here is all batsmen know he and and Ashwin bowl more good than bad balls, Bishoo on the other hand bowl mostly bad balls without varieties! I hope you nah start this thread to justify Bishoo shit bowling today?
In reply to WestDem
some people pay attention to the nuances of the game and don't dwell on players every moment of their life dude
jezaz krise
but that you raise the issue
you'd be surprised to know that Bishoo's economy rate in ODIs is 4.6 and Zampa's 5.5
after 26 and 25 ODIs respectively
but that's not the point
In reply to doosra
Very quietly you are coming around and post exactly what I was thinking? Sometimes it's better to look at history in its fullness and not dat sample you posted!
A more useful statistical tool for evaluative purposes would be the product of strike rate and econ rate.
The reason being wicket taking ability is also important.
It is:
Bishoo 197.
Zampa 152.
The lower figure gets the nod.
Captains don't mind giving away a few extra runs for wickets.
Search
Live Scores
- no matches