Discuss
Message Board Archives
Darwin Was Agnostic
In reply to Runs
and the pope is catholic
what is there to discuss?
In reply to conman
Why
In reply to Runs
okay, lets go deeper first
what did darwin believe?
In reply to conman
Adaptation, survival of the fittest, natural selection. Did not dismiss that perhaps a superior being designed. Now your turn.
In reply to Runs
no no no
you started with this
what does that mean in terms of his beliefs
In reply to conman
Did you miss my above post?
You do understand what an agnostic is am assuming or am I incorrect?
In reply to Runs
are you saying for certain, this is what darwin believed?
Nor did he dismiss bigfoot being responsible either
Intelligent design would be apt or not?
In reply to Runs
sure
if there is evidence to suggest it
do you have any such evidence?
In reply to conman
Intelligent design can be tied into Darwin's theory of natural selection.
In reply to Runs
how?
and once again, what evidence do you have to suggest that?
This does not seem to be going anywhere fast.
In reply to conman
Darwin never disputed that perhaps a supreme creator did design and meant for evolutionary traits to determine which creatures survived and which did not. Intelligent design so to speak not far from Paley's clock thesis, every part was designed to serve a purpose by it's maker.
In reply to Runs
I also do not know where you are going with this.
Is this because Darwin's theory is often used by atheists?
In reply to nick2020
This is deep stuff bro stick with your Trumptards way over your head.
In reply to Runs
but what evidence do we have to suggest that an intelligent design did play a part?
In reply to Runs
dont do that
there is nothing deep going on here
In reply to conman
What evidence do you have against an intelligent design or creator not playing a part?
In reply to Runs
So i have to prove a claim you're making?
its easy to change that up, but you are the one making the claim, now back it up
In reply to conman
You brought up Bigfoot, what's up with all the questions? I am only stating his findings.
In reply to Runs
you call it intelligent design i call it bigfoot, neither of us have evidence to disprove the other
Im wanting to know how you can say
In reply to conman
He never really answered that question, where did this all begin.
Remember around his time biblical scholars thought earth was roughly 6k years old.
In reply to Runs
but how does that lead to
In reply to conman
"The impossibility of conceiving that this grand and wondrous universe with our conscious selves arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for the existence of God" -
In reply to Runs
so you got no evidence
correct?
"The impossibility of conceiving that this grand and wondrous universe with our conscious selves arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for the existence of BIGFOOT" -
In reply to conman
That was Darwin brother, am discussing him not me. You are arguing another topic. The man said he was Agnostic.
We are speaking about his theory on Natural Selection not some mythical creature.
In reply to Runs
Good advice. Thanks.
In reply to Runs
but what does his belief or lack there of in a intelligent design have to do with the science he put forth?
In reply to Runs
did another runs post
In reply to Runs
....
Search
Live Scores
- no matches