...is a funny thing. Sometimes it takes a while, sometimes not so long. Oh well!
Message Board Archives
Retribution...
In reply to zimzimma
yu wake up 3:00 in the maawning to say this? Oh... well
retribution for what?
In reply to zimzimma
de bwoy did not run out BCL fuh spite
I hope there is no West Indian supporter who will be pleased to see Samuels being banned for 2 years...
In reply to crapaud
Three West Indians found him guilty, I am a WI supporter and also a samuels supporter.
My take on it is that samuels being found guilty should be banned, two years is a bit much but if you do the crime then you have to do the time.
In reply to crapaud
I doubt if there is any West Indian supporters who will be pleased to see him ban for being liable...
In reply to CW
Apparently you haven't read the Code of Conduct.
In reply to Chrissy Where is the official report?? Them still writing it?? Or as I suspect smoke was just being blown by RJR? Its interesting that I have not seen any other media house whether print or otherwise with this report and they didnt repeat in the news yesterday
In reply to zimzimma
When you think you're bigger than the game despite yuh mediocre record these tings happen.
Sad that he'll be remembered for two shameless acts. Just wait for dem reports and articles from di cricket world.
In reply to Samwells
Mek sure you're listening and reading everything today.
In reply to Chrissy will do...and even if he banned he wont be "remembered" cause he will be back in the team at the end of this,as mediocre as u say he is u cant tell me 5 batsmen in the WI who better than him so he career aint done.
So haul off with u bad mind self
In reply to Chrissy
What are the two shameless acts?
In reply to truebaj
SO?
In reply to Chrissy
yes I have madam and I have also read RJR's news and the transcripts and Marlon's response
I have even read some other articles so tell me which code did he fully violate..
And have you read any of the codes in full and please tell us which of these code will you sentence him under.. For God sake cant you see why they have had such difficulties in dealing with the case.. The guy gave out info as per the first parts of many of the codes but the other parts he can and does deny.. Dont you think there is Justice in this world or do you think in terms of Just us
Supporters want to see players banned if they are guilty of violating a code of conduct and banned if they commit a criminal act.. you need to grasp the implication of the term liable to a charge of bribery
In reply to CW
So you're saying you read everything that DJ, the Committee and his lawyers read?
Allyuh killing me wid laughter.
In reply to Narper
In reply to Chrissy
doh where did I say that?
you been reading to many Jackanory stories.. stick to the point...
which code?
In reply to Chrissy
and you think this any better than what Marlon did ..giving info about a team
At least we can say cricket is a sport... but your pre-emptive strike is on a person..but then again moral values may not spread to wishing for the worst.. we will wait and hope you do enjoy your I told you so
Sorry to disappoint you but thats not what I will remember him for..some of us in this world will always remember people for the good they do...
I'm sure somewhere deep inside of you there's a good person trying to get out.. but I am prepared to be wrong (and please dont take it as a personal diss but I just cant see any positives in what you write)
Still nothing in the Gleaner or Observer.
Two days and nothing in any of the regional papers?
In reply to faada
Why do you think that there is still nothing on those 2 papers?
In reply to crapaud
all seems very strange to me, I really have no clue.
I can't even speculate as to why.
In reply to camos
Well he's not in the camp according to RJR. WICB would speak with ICC and people aren't in offices on the weekend.
Samuels has been dropped from the squad.
In reply to crapaud
good question bro... some people always look before dem leap
In reply to faada
OK Tks
come on WICB mek ah statement..
In reply to greypatch
On past form, WICB will make its statement last...when it doesn't matter anymore.
In reply to Narper
Are you suggesting that not spite but money was the motive? Of course with marlon pure dunce can never be ruled out.
Anyways, meh waiting to hear an official release before I take sides in this issue.
In reply to Chrissy Before this is all done I am sure u will come out of this looking silly...AGAIN
In reply to CW
"I am prepared to be wrong (and please dont take it as a personal diss but I just cant see any positives in what you write)"
Call it like it is she is the Bad Minded Prof. (BMP)
In reply to Dreama
What I dont understand is dat Samwells ponce on her say she a blow up tings out a proportion and she say naaah but then she come back bout "shameless act" instead of just say di man behaviour and "the horrible happening" instead of whats going on..
rastafari anybody woulda think Samuels just commit mass murder or something ..
if she want talk bout shameless act in West Indies cricket all ah dem who get picked and play like a Sunday club player over the years and den get tek money from the WICB and turn round ah call it salary.. that is a shameless act
In reply to CW
There is a certain Pagan watch him bat and you must remain grounded, but is he an angel? A tour of England he pulled out needing a break from the sport, the British sponsors could not have that paid one player more than the entire team, he suspended the break.
Many players were close to the edge, but got a little push from Pagan, Rose, Patterson, Hooper
.. is he an angel I beg to differ, but can the Bad Minded Prof. admit this?
In reply to Narper
Hahahahahahaha! Ok, Narps, thanks for telling me that!
In reply to crapaud
Why yu acting like a blonde today?
In reply to zimzimma
only today ?
In reply to Narper
LOL!
In reply to crapaud Principle is principle, are you going to encourage a youngster to break the rules or follow them. Why be so subjective in your approach, why not encounrage youths to refrain from those of Sam.If West Indians are happy that the panel took the right decision then I applauded them in having such sentiments, due process occurred. Putting West Indians in a corner will not cut it, the issue is SAM and his misconduct, he has to pay a price, the public must used this case to illustrate to youngsters what consequences they face if they choose to go down that path. Long live the West Indian peoples.
In reply to Dreama
In reply to bodyline
Well people trying dey best to focus on everything else but that!
In reply to zimzimma
Eeent.
In reply to CW
its not liable its guilty...pls read again:
Mr. Marlon Samuels, found by majority opinion that Mr. Samuels was guilty of violating the ICC Rules of Conduct 4 ix in that he "received money, benefit or other reward which could bring him or the game of cricket into disrepute."
he was not found liable mi fren he was found guilty. its pretty simple really!
In reply to southward
Apparently not for some!
No wonder the region is a mess. Too many West Indians are petty.
In reply to southward
dont tell me u stupid man..
the man was liable to bribery charges ie exchange of tings
like him give info and some sort of gift was given in return
Thats the charge....
The verdict... him guilty of violating the code
your ass can be charged for murder and you found guilty of manslaughter
you can be liable to a charge of brurglary and found guilty
of theft
you can be liable to a charge of dangerous driving and found guilty of driving without due care and attention
jeez man where di hell u live..on second thoughts dont answer dat
In reply to southward
So with all this so called "evidence" .....why was it a 2/1 majority and not unanimous?
In reply to zimzimma
Even di Observer gets it
In reply to Cleg
Do you know how many men on death row with 2-1 majorities?
In reply to Chrissy
Yes.....none!!
In reply to Cleg
Go study some appeal court decisions yuh hear.
In reply to Cleg
I man neva come across a bunch of stupid people like some of these
who dont understand the difference between a charge and a verdict
I hope these people dont bring any life into this world
these are the dam eediats that will lecture dem pickney on the donts of sex and ignore protection then get vex when pregnancy occurs
In reply to Chrissy
appeal courts review caseas!

