Message Board Archives

HEADLINE: BCCI drops $42 million claim for damages

 
CaribbeanCricket.com Apr 21, 2016, 12:04:13 PM 

ESPNcricinfo is carrying the news that the BCCI's new administration has dropped the Indian board's demand for $42 million in damages arising from the aborted West indies tour of India in 2014. 
"That is now sorted out because they are going to come back and play here next year," said BCCI president Shashank Manohar. "They have to complete those [unfinished] games. That was a claim raised by the board. [We] would be satisfied by them coming and playing here."


Full Story

 
BeatDball Apr 21, 2016, 12:19:06 PM 

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com Wow! Meh tort jewmaycans don't kiss batty! Meh belly. Lmao.

big grin lol smile

 
Khaga Apr 21, 2016, 12:27:10 PM 

In reply to BeatDball

Shawshank Manohar is kissing Jamaican Dave's batty..

 
carl0002 Apr 21, 2016, 12:30:43 PM 

DD now getting ready to put the other boot up Keith Mitchells .....


lol lol lol lol

Anyone get the sense that if they dissolve the WICB this $42m suit back on the table lol lol

Of course that cant be since WI agree to make up the matches.
lol lol A notion none the less given the timing. lol lol

 
Slipfeeler Apr 21, 2016, 12:34:02 PM 

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com

I predicted before that the $42 mill would have been dropped prior to the Indian tour, people on the board thought that it would never happen. Well despite all the negativity surrounding the WICB, and we blame both players and the WICB for getting us into that mess but we also have to give Cameron some props for working towards getting us out of that financial situation.

 
buds Apr 21, 2016, 1:58:30 PM 

Cameron kicking nuff Asses on the MB and in the WI--ROFLMAO--

 
sudden Apr 21, 2016, 2:35:39 PM 

Everybody and their dog knew the $42 mil was a potential claim and not a real claim. That was reported here many times by me. This doesn't put DD in any good light. Nothing he did extinguish the claim- it was never lodged and was never intended to be

 
natty_forever Apr 21, 2016, 2:37:42 PM 

In reply to buds ... yet beatupballs sees it differently.

 
POINT Apr 21, 2016, 3:20:07 PM 

Birds of a Feather .....Together .

Two .... in a Pod .

Comrades .. Arms

I .......Your Back...Scratch .. Back

The 7 Members of the ICC are getting
Rewards for approving of the Hijacking
of the ICC Profits by England ; Australia & India .

 
buds Apr 21, 2016, 4:34:12 PM 

In reply to POINT

Roflmao..Put up the pen.All that writing for naught

 
ponderiver Apr 21, 2016, 4:44:08 PM 

In reply to sudden


Everybody and their dog knew the $42 mil is a potential claim and not a real claim. That was reported here many times by me. This doesn't put DD in any good light. Nothing he did extinguish the claim- it was never lodged and was never intended to be


stop yuh flip flopping did you not say on an earlier thread that India only abandoned their claim after overtures from Sobers


the settlement with India was brokered by Sir Garry after he was sent to India because the Indians didnt want to deal with DD

 
buds Apr 21, 2016, 5:03:12 PM 

The President does not go to negotiations himself..He sends surrogates to do his bid..
Genius Dave..

 
sudden Apr 21, 2016, 5:06:54 PM 

In reply to ponderiver

How does one contradict the other, jherri?

 
camos Apr 21, 2016, 5:09:02 PM 

In reply to ponderiver

lol lol

 
ponderiver Apr 21, 2016, 5:17:05 PM 

In reply to sudden

Oh what a tangled Web you weave

Caught out by your own words and agenda

So if it was never going to happen why claim that Sobers went there to negotiate when all he did was bawled down di place big grin big grin big grin big grin big grin big grin

 
POINT Apr 21, 2016, 5:44:23 PM 

In reply to buds

I would like You to explain , the
remarkable conversion of at least one if not all 3 of the Representatives of
the WICBC in the joint CARICOM / WICB
were apparently persuaded by the other 2 Members of the Committee to
state that the WICBC must be dissolved .

Now I know that this fact has been glossed over by the WICBC itself , and its Spin Doctors , and its Supporters here and in the Media .

My perspective , is that this was & is a serious indictment of the WICBC , because it infers that the two Representatives not appointed by the WICBC , were able to persuade at least one ,if not all of the Representatives of the WICBC to agree
that the WICBC must be dissolved .

FYI , the CARICOM / WICBC Committee
consisted of 5 Members , 3 were appointed by the WICBC . Obviously
the majority ,in numerical numbers were appointed by the WICBC . Yet the Panel voted that the WICBC must be dissolved .

In essence the WICBC was handed a Vote of No Confidence by the Panel ,
now this is a fact not Fiction ; and
cannot be washed or wished away .

 
Ewart Apr 21, 2016, 7:32:16 PM 

In reply to carl0002

Anyone get the sense that if they dissolve the WICB this $42m suit back on the table?



No.


If the WIBC goes, the case against it goes. When a new entity takes over a business, you can't file suit against them. Many entities avoid this by pretending to disappear but are merely changing their official names.


//

 
carl0002 Apr 21, 2016, 7:59:13 PM 

In reply to ponderiver
Sudden ain't making any sense since the otherday. I suspect he recently married for the 5th time.
lol lol

 
ponderiver Apr 21, 2016, 9:03:06 PM 

In reply to carl0002

big grin big grin big grin

 
mikesiva Apr 22, 2016, 12:05:03 AM 

WICB president Dave Cameron, without elaborating much, said: "We stand by what ever Mr Manohar says."
big grin

 
Halliwell Apr 22, 2016, 1:30:10 AM 

Justice for Bravs and Polly

No tangible loss

Grievances still apply

 
buds Apr 22, 2016, 2:45:25 AM 

In reply to POINT

Do they have any credibility in determining that the WICB be dissolved? You cannot have a Kangaroo Panel recommending that the WICB be dissolved especially when members on that Committee are questionable at best!
Too many people/Groups have ulterior malign motives in seeing the dissolution of the WICB..
They cannot be taken seriously..

 
sudden Apr 22, 2016, 4:13:13 AM 

In reply to ponderiver

In the real world - a world without jherri curl septuagenarians- you tend to head off a crisis before it starts. So on the one hand the India threaten WI with a law suit to the tune of $42 mil. Never going to happen. On the other hand they say we can work out something but we don't want to deal with DD, we can deal with someone with standing. That is good for the WI cos they get to settle this crap once and for all and foot and mout disease DD does not have to be involved.

They decide Sobers has legendary status plus the Indians want to take a few photos and talk shop. Sobers goes, cries for the camera, laments about WI cricket and the deal is struck with tentative dates to be agreed.

 
sudden Apr 22, 2016, 4:17:13 AM 

In reply to carl0002

i am going to soon sic Powen on you to nip at your ankles big grin

 
ponderiver Apr 22, 2016, 4:53:37 AM 

In reply to sudden


the

jherri curl septuagenarians
would be yuh gal dem


you are now a confirmed troller and a liar


Sobers except for captaincy has given great service to west indies cricket,I hate to see his name dragged through the mud by disingenuous peeps like you bent on scoring cheap points.

However ,Please get Garry to shed a few tears fuh the Trident franchise tenks

 
POINT Apr 22, 2016, 7:43:20 AM 

In reply to buds

The point that I have made that has seemingly gone over your head is this:

AT LEAST ONE OF THE 3 MEMBERS APPOINTED

BY THE WICBC WERE PERSUADED TO STATE

THAT THE WICBC MUST BE DISSOLVED .

The fact is that rather than the WICBC's 3 members persuading the other 2 members to joining them in
Supporting the WICBC . However the
opposite happened .

This fact cannot be spinned by the
WICBC or its Spin Doctors in the Media or in this Forum .