Message Board Archives

HEADLINE: The captaincy factor

 
CaribbeanCricket.com Apr 26, 2007, 5:52:31 AM 

Despite his poor record as captain throughout three dispensations, the departure of Brian Lara has generated more debate about the future of West Indies cricket than perhaps any other single event in the history of the game in the region.

Many cursed his captaincy, and would have been more than eager to see him go as leader of the team a long time ago. But at the same time, they would have admired his batsmanship, which was superior to all that played the game in his era
Full Story

 
ray Apr 26, 2007, 5:58:17 AM 

ah thought Daniel was bringing something different to the table 8)

 
Surya Apr 26, 2007, 5:59:56 AM 

In reply to ray He is..By not blaming Lara alone for for everything bad about WI cricket, don't you think he bringing something different? :wink:

 
ray Apr 26, 2007, 6:01:13 AM 

In reply to Surya

actually...dem Trinis like Redmoron been sayin dat for ah while :lol:...Daniel mus be ah Trini

 
Dukes Apr 26, 2007, 6:08:11 AM 

My first reaction to seeing this guy's article is not him again,but I can find no fault with what he says.

 
notinsular Apr 26, 2007, 6:14:06 AM 

In reply to Dukes

But isn't this exactly you all were all over Tony Fraser for saying yesterday?

Simply amazing :(

 
ends Apr 26, 2007, 6:23:30 AM 

In reply to Dukes

Is not about finding no fault....but does he ever say anything new? Revealing? Something we did not already know?

 
redbaron Apr 26, 2007, 6:24:49 AM 

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com

Despite his poor record as captain throughout three dispensations,


As ooposed to the rich...very rich...record of the WI cricket team over the past 15 years or so.

We cannot omit that...the WI cricket team had a very rich record except for when Brian Lara was captain.

 
Surya Apr 26, 2007, 6:26:00 AM 

In reply to ends How many do? I am not contradicting your view..It seems with all the different media that we have, we seem to be privy to repetetive information/analysis

 
ends Apr 26, 2007, 6:28:44 AM 

In reply to Surya

Yeah, but some journalists are able to get the reader to sit back and say: "Very well put....I knew this before but he really brings it across well...jolly good article, old chap".

Singh cannot elicit much more thought from the reader, other than "Why did I bother reading that crap"...or "Does Singh look constipated in that picture?"

 
SirGarny Apr 26, 2007, 6:33:45 AM 

In reply to Dukes

The arguement by most reasonable cricket fans in and from the region is that a player should not be considered as captain unless he has first cemented his place on the team. As qualified as Ganga may be, with his sound technique, cricketing intelligence, and reported strong character traits, he still has left many in doubt as to his ability to produce on the highest level.

Let him make the team first purely on merit. If his "prodigious" talents come to the fore and his production increases dramatically, then consider him for the captaincy.

For now, Sarwan, by virtue of tenure, average, and to some extent, by default, should take the reigns. The added responsibilty will mature him at the very least.

 
ray Apr 26, 2007, 6:33:50 AM 

In reply to ends

After reading...I was still looking for the punch line :lol:

 
Komando Apr 26, 2007, 6:37:49 AM 

Sometimes the great ones don't make great leaders.
Look at the great Sir Garry .... inherited a
powerful team in 1965 ..... attention was not paid
to transition .... and by June 1969 we were a
pitiful team in England.

No argument here that Lara is not an inspiring
leader.In fairness to him, it is not easy to deal
with officials from WICB.

He is still the best batsman in the WI and is the
reason I pay good money to DishNetwork to see WI
cricket. I'm surprised he allowed others to get to
him and left before he wanted to.

The logical thing to do was for Lara to continue
as skipper for the Test series vs England and then
hand over to the new captain for the ODI. Then he
plays as a batsman as long as he earns his pick.

However, we all know there is nothing logical
about West Indies cricket.

 
Flickcan Apr 26, 2007, 8:32:14 AM 

But with the West Indies becoming accustomed to struggling through their 50 overs, Ganga becomes a natural addition to the one-day team, especially given the continued exposure and exploitation of Chris Gayle’s lack of proper technique by opposing bowlers.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 
carib Apr 26, 2007, 8:53:55 AM 

The big problem with Sarwan is that the WICB selection panel signalled a new direction with the forcing out of Lara. Clearly there is going to be lot more emphasis on discpline & fitness. Indeed , it is now part of the selection criteria for the captaincy. Sarwan fails that criteria.

 
imusic Apr 26, 2007, 9:01:17 AM 

Anybody know who Fleming vice captain is?

Ponting?

Vaughn?

Smith?

 
TanteMerle Apr 26, 2007, 9:02:30 AM 

In reply to carib

Skuntwan is a big alkiholic, womanizing, patrying can hook facker.

Ganja fa cappo in both forma ah de game.
Bravo as Vice capo.

 
redbaron Apr 26, 2007, 9:06:10 AM 

In reply to carib

Tell us...what good is it to have a very fit driver...physically, mentally, the works...to drive a bus that has knocking, overheating engine, smooth tires, no brakes, bad shocks, leaking roof, broken windows, empty gas tank, very uncomfortable seats and no mechanics?

Kindly explain how the fitness of the driver will overcome all that and successfully drive bus that on steep decline?

Perhaps you would rather not tackle this.

 
Spectator Apr 26, 2007, 9:06:35 AM 

In reply to Dukes

I don't know, but I find myself agreeing with you more often than not. That was a well balance article from Daniel.

 
uton Apr 26, 2007, 1:13:49 PM 

In reply to imusic

Anybody know who Fleming vice captain is?

Ponting?

Vaughn?

Smith?


Vettori
Gilchrist
Strauss
Prince