Some years ago, a candidate for the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) presidency was eventually with
Message Board Archives
HEADLINE: A stitch in time
What destroys democracies is APATHY.Ms.Baksh is like a voice crying in the widerness. The Jamaicans
In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com I would like to compliment Ms. Baksh on her timely and insitefu
In reply to POINT I would like to compliment Ms. Baksh on her timely and insiteful article .
In reply to POINT What did she say that we didn't write here ages ago?
In reply to Chrissy Still smarting from that cut-arse she put on you back in Feb? :lol:
In reply to ganga_fan :lol: :lol: What?? Them things available online now through AMAZON.COM
In reply to powen001 dunno wat u talking bout dude.....still about 14 years old yah/....watch u
In reply to Dukes What destroys democracies is APATHY.Ms.Baksh is like a voice crying in the wi
In reply to Arawak Yardie suit on now ::tam taddam::
In reply to ends :lol:
In reply to ends Huh?
In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com This view quoted from the Lucky repoert... The financing of the C
In reply to Dukes Hear hear. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat their mistakes........
And so the 'defense' begins :lol:
In reply to Dukes The Jamaicans will rise to his defence for no other reason than he is their cou
In reply to Rastaman Isn't she quoting the Lucky Report?
Yardies to the defense of slippery Cameron. Whats new!!! Unless and untill the entire WICB goes ex
In reply to Rastaman Are you saying people defend only on nationality an not on the merit of the
In reply to Arawak HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
In reply to Dukes :lol:
while in principle there was a potential conflict of intrest in having d/cell refurbish the club, b
(Did dukes get kicked in the nuts? His laugh seems a bit high-pitched) One has to ask the question
In reply to Dukes Yuh are naive or even foolish to think that Chetty and Cameron's situation here
In reply to ganga_fan dunno wat u talking bout dude.....still about 14 years old yah/....watch u
In reply to tobesuresure Is evidence to show impropriety easily obtainable? I suspect you never he
In reply to powen001 Call Dateline NBC...and further more..this is an adult mature content site
In reply to Chrissy You are quite correct , but she possibly has a bigger audience that this MB
In reply to tobesuresure I would have had a bigger problem however if someone can show me how Com
In reply to Rastaman We are trying to keep crooks out of the WICB,you are trying to keep stupid pe
In reply to Rastaman I want all persons to be like Caesar's wife , above suspicion . Especially
who think Cameron wasn't bribed? there is ah bridge in Brooklyn available for sale....hahaha :lol:
In reply to POINT Then you should be out there campaigning for the removal of Cameron from the WIC
In reply to Chrissy Excellent point, she is assimilating the members writings on the Board and w
In reply to Rastaman jah bless.
In reply to Dukes so who is who with respect to crooks and stupid people???
In reply to Rastaman if Digicel is suspected of bribing and we are going to hold such a high sta
In reply to Rastaman The other point must be made that the so-called "inducement" cam
In reply to Rastaman You are clearly auditioning very well for one of these categories. HAHAHAHA
In reply to Rastaman Let me be perfectly clear , I dont have any objection to person from Jamaic
In reply to hewesleyb that cliche is not an argument... make your point or keep quiet!!!!!
In reply to POINT I don't even necessarily agree with Cameron's candidacy. But one cannot dismiss
In reply to Rastaman At the end of the day, it is a bit of an innocuous charge isn't it? Even if
Since Ms. Bakh is quoting from the Lucky report,why doesnt she quote the CONCLUSION :that the evid
In reply to Rastaman I brought it up because I thought that was your reason for objecting to per
In reply to carib This is not a legal issue.You continue speaking in legalese when what we are tal
Did I say APATHY is what destroys democracies???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
In reply to Dukes This is not a legal issue.You continue speaking in legalese when what we are t
In reply to Cleg If it is not a legal issue then LEGALLY Cameron CANNOT BE BARRED on the basis o
In reply to Fortis If it is not a legal issue then LEGALLY Cameron CANNOT BE BARRED on the basis o
In reply to Chrissy The Moriarty Report rings a bell???? :roll:
In reply to Dukes Well simply write appropriately if you do not wish to be rebutted. You are the
In reply to Fortis You fail to understand that the world does not revolve around make beliefs.
In reply to Dukes The problem with you lawyer types is that you just don't get it. You think they