Report Card News Topic

West Indies Third Test Grades



The third and final test between the West Indies and India dragged to a tame draw after Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman contrived to bat the West Indies out of the match. The West Indies encountered some ups-and-downs in this game and although the more optimistic fans were hoping for a consolation victory, there were some very positive things coming out of this match.

The batting, especially, thrived in this game after the embarrassments of the previous two Tests and the emergence of Marlon Samuels, after being censured by tour management, was significant. Samuels demonstrated a single-mindedness of purpose, making the the intervention of Wes Hall look like a touch of pure genius. Shiv Chanderpaul, Wavell Hinds, Chris Gayle also enjoyed the limelight.

I would also like to level some criticisms at the incompetent umpiring suffered by both sides throughout the series, especially from the 'elite' Ashoka Da Silva. If the object of this article was to grade the umpires I would have no choice but to give them both failing grades, and hopefully the ICC is paying attention to this problem. However, that is all I am going to say about the umpires, as the players grade is where I want to focus my attention:



CHRIS GAYLE:

Gayle finally displayed the grit and focus necessary for limited players to be successful at the Test level, especially when the conditions are not ideal for their style of batting. His one blemish being that he did not complete a third Test century, being undone by one of the "Spitting Cobra" deliveries that Harbajan is able to produce with regularity on Indian pitches. Prior to that, he displayed admirable restraint in controlling his natural attacking tendencies, and admirably supporting Wavell Hinds who did get his century. Gayle managed to win over more fans with this inning than he did with his two previous knocks of 204 and 175.

GRADE: B+



WAVELL HINDS:

Hinds proved why he is considered one of the finest young Jamaican batsmen around by scoring his third test century in this match. He played exceedingly well and, with Gayle, posted a new West Indies opening partnership record of 172. The only fly in the ointment is that when Hinds had the bowling at his mercy and should have gone on, end the day undefeated, he contrived to get out by sweeping Harbajan hard and
straight to square leg.

GRADE: A-



RAMNARESH SARWAN:

Sarwan coming in with the score at 172 and with Harbajan smelling blood, was stumped when he didn't pick the top-spinner. With all the other young batsmen currently in the team having scored a Test hundred, it has to be weighing heavily on Sarwan's mind that he has yet to post a three-figure score. Having not solidified himself as the number three batsman, maybe the time has come for Sarwan to go down the order and reorganize his game.

GRADE: F



SHIVNARINE CHANDERPAUL:

Chanderpaul returned to his customary position of being the backbone of the West Indies batting lineup, with a sublime effort in the West Indies' only inning. Coming in at a difficult time when the West Indies had slipped from 172 without loss to 186 for 3, Chanders saw out the evening and on the resumption, with Marlon Samuels, laid waste to the Indian bowling, equalling his Test best 140. It was West Indian batting at its most exciting, and at this point, Chanderpaul must be considered the most important batsman, if not the best, in this young side.

GRADE: A



CARL HOOPER:

Carl Hooper's lean run with the bat continued, and he again displayed that maddening habit of getting out when seemingly well-set. Even though he fell victim to a great catch by the noisy Indian wicketkeeper, Hooper seemed to want to get a big score in this match. His captaincy in this game continued to show flashes of inspiration -- the placement of Chanderpaul in the leg slip position, when the dangerous Sehwag was batting against Dillon in the second -- and head scratching decisions, e.g. when he took himself out of the attack on the final morning, when Tendulkar and Laxman were clearly uncomfortable playing him. Hooper bowled well and is clearly the best spinner in the West Indies team, which is certainly not a ringing endorsement of the spinners chosen by the selectors. Hopefully, the performance of the batsmen in this match signals the long-awaited turnaround that all West Indies fans pray for.

GRADE: C



MARLON SAMUELS:

In this match, Samuels demonstrated why he is considered to be one of the best young talents around. Having previously demonstrated an unflappable demeanor when he was thrust into the ill-fated tour of Australia, he again showed tremendous confidence, when only hours removed from almost being ignominiously dismissed from this tour for disciplinary reasons, and undoubtedly under enormous pressure, Samuels declared he that he "was dying to bat against the Indian spinners" and then proceeded to rise to the occasion. Looking not like a batsman with a handful of innings under his belt, but a seasoned professional with many years battling in these exacting conditions, Samuels displayed a large repertoire of strokes, and each ball was played on its merit. There was nary a false stroke until he fell to one that bounced and turned from Harbajan. If Samuels continues in this vein he will be one of the greats.

GRADE: A



RIDLEY JACOBS:

Ridley Jacobs looked much better in this match, and actually is tied with Alan Gilchrist for the most dismissals for calendar year 2002. He batted well at the bottom of the order and was instrumental in helping to push the West Indian score close to the 500 mark.

GRADE: B



MERV DILLON:

Dillon again suffered from lack of support, or it may be that Dillon himself is a mere support bowler. That said, it was refreshing to see Dillon attack Sehwag's body in the second innings when he noticed that he wasn't handling the short fast-rising delivery to the ribs very well. Hooper gave him the leg slip and he was able to direct the ball where he needed to produce the desired result. At times, he seemed disinterested and that must have caused Hooper some headaches. One would hope that instead of Cuffy or Collins sharing the new ball with Dillon, we would see a Reon King or a Franklyn Rose thus adding more teeth to the West Indies new ball attack.

GRADE: B-



DARREN POWELL:

Darren Powell showed his inexperience in that he was not able to keep the batsmen under sustained pressure. Two many deliveries were misdirected either far outside the off or down the leg-side. He did pick up three wickets in the match, which is really all we should expected of a bowler of his experience, and given the nature of the wicket, he still tried to bowl as fast as possible.

GRADE: B-



JERMAINE LAWSON:

Lawson again bowled with good pace albeit without the unerring control needed at this level. Even though the pitch was flat, Lawson, like Powell, showed a willingness to bend his back and use the short ball in an attempt to rattle the Indian batsmen. As he gains more experience, he should fulfill the enormous potential.

GRADE: B-



CAMERON CUFFY:

Hopefully this will be the last time, at least in Tests, that we will be subjected to Cuffy's brand of "line and nothing else" bowling. In fact, on the TV commentatary, Michael holding was heard to remark (off camera but loudly enough) that Cuffy should be removed from the attack because he "couldn't bowl". It was embarrassing to see Srinath hit him all over the ground, and Cuffy continue to bowl delivery after delivery into his wheel house. Where was the pride? Where was the venom? Any fast bowler worth his salt would have made Srinath show whether he really knew how to use the bat. Sadly, Hooper had to resort to hiding Cuffy.

GRADE: F

* Click here for first and second Test report cards by Lawrence Romeo.