... its been a few innings now since you made a valuable contribution. Today would be good!
Message Board Archives
Ramdin ...
In reply to natty_forever
Scoreboard showing they need 82 more to win,so he got to get at least 40 to make up for some recent failures,and he better be not out or else his 40 will count as a failure.
In reply to granite... not out is what I looking for, score will work out if he not out.
In reply to natty_forever
no mentioning of the mis-stumping ?
In reply to tc1... would have to have seen it.
In reply to tc1
vultures out eh
don't think he needs another tho
cob is large enough
In reply to doosra... remember them Bajans going see all them things ... Dowrich taught them well.
In reply to natty_forever
downrich can keep from now till jesus returns
he will never touch Ramdin as a keeper...
In reply to natty_forever
We know he is the best keeper in town,but some of his failures in this "dung heap" is unacceptable,when yuh check men like Cornwall,Devon Smith and some ah de younger ones.Unless he cyah do much better than that,he wouldn't see a Windies team.He is a very annoying fella,he should be doing so,so much better,nuff said.
In reply to granite
Did he not mis-stumped a batsman today?
... and a saying, I do not know. However, seems it didn't have much of an impact.
In reply to natty_forever
He has no reason to complain,time to look for someone and start fresh.I was one who supported him,there was no doubt that he should have done better in tests,he had the ability to do it.
In reply to granite... he does, he was not dropped for cricketing reasons.
People Ramdum makes runs when he don't keep.
Only me seeing that.
He made 700 runs in 4day fielding out.
Ramdum is a dumb skunt.
Where is Ambris? Still injured?
In reply to tc1
maybe he did but he could have had 5 mis-stumpings today and still be 100x better the keeper dowrich is
In reply to Windies2017
is that logical to you, when Dowrich relieve Ramdin he was a better bat and on par with him as a keeper.
In reply to tc1
Key word being WHEN..do you still think he is on par with him as a keeper? Also, Ramdin has been more than deserving of a recall with his first class form even as a specialist batsman.
In reply to tc1
Dowrich was never Ramdin's equal as a wicketkeeper.The notion that he was a better batsman is also a fallacy.
In reply to tc1
Based on what? Ramdin's test performance against ICC higher ranked opposition vs Dowrich dungheap performace?
Anyone with sense would know Ramdin was dropped for non cricketing reasons
In reply to Dukes
Yeah, I doubt Dowrich was ever on par with Ramdin regarding wicketkeeping skills but I wasn't following Dowrich's debut series so didn't make a judgment on that
In reply to Narper
Bajan logic
In reply to Narper
Back to back 50s and dropped
Search
Live Scores
- no matches