...do the right thing and vote the Skerrit/Shallow ticket in CWI election.
Message Board Archives
Calling on Julian "Holder" Charles to....
In reply to InHindsight
Why did you nominate or second Cameron?
In reply to openning
Ummmm
Tell me again?
My position is purely in the interest of WI cricket
Let me take this opportunity to say that I like Mr Charles personally. A very fine respectable gentleman and former regional cricketer
In reply to InHindsight
Guyana and the Windwards, the two culprits that nominated the DD, Leewards and T&T did the same for Skerritt.
In reply to openning
So Bim eh culprits too
Link
In reply to openning
Not too late to throw support behind Skerrit/Shallow
In reply to Maispwi
Bim will be a culprit, if they vote for Cameron.
In reply to openning
Conde say dat Bim have agreed to vote for Cameron
Has there been a change?
In reply to Maispwi
Wait until the act is committed, you can only be guilty after the jury verdict, the BCA will be guilty after the vote.
All we can do as of now, is give Cameron six unconfirmed votes, two each from the BCA, Windwards and GCA.
It is like a poll at this time.
BTW, I heard the BCA changed one of it voting delegate, not wanting anyone to go rogue on its board.
In reply to openning
So why you calling Guyana and Windwards culprits before de act when dey did de same ting dat Bim and Jamaica have done?
In reply to Maispwi
the only reason Skerrit is running is to protect the baseball player from Pybus
In reply to Maispwi
Have you ever been part of an association that elect officials?
If you nominate or second someone, that mean you support the person for the job.
Had Guyana and the Windward decline, it would had been left to the JCA and the BCA.
It is obvious the JCA is not 100% committed to DD, it is the second time that body is not all in for him.
In reply to tc1
Vivi and clown prince fi pakis $cammy lookin fi ah food tuh...
Gwine b too close to call eh...
In reply to tc1
Man speak intelligently
In reply to openning
Jamaica not getting anything.
In reply to Maispwi
If what You have stated is True , it is very interesting , That Barbados
would already decide to vote for
Cameron therefore it is unnecessary
to hear from From Skerritt & Shallow .
Imagine that Asinine Behaviour ; I do
not believe that is how Democracy works . Especially in Barbados , where
its inhabitants have always boasted
of being the most Educated Country in the Region .
I was under the impression that if
there are 2 Parties Contesting an
Election , it is incumbent that both
Parties get equal time to state why
the Barbadian Delegates , should after hearing both Both Teams , then after the Presentation of Both then ,decide which One they would cast their Vote for .
If those eligible to vote in Barbados , decide only to hear from
One side only ; and other Countries in the Region Mimic what Barbados states it will do ; My perspective is that this is Regional Disgrace .
This tangibly demonstrates why I continuously state that WE need
Completely New Structures in the WICBC ; and all the Regional Cricket Boards .
Every Freaking Day the actions of the Cricket Boards in the Region & the WICBC provide CONCRETE Evidence
that buttresses what I continuously
state in this Forum .
THERE NEEDS TO BE NEW STRUCTURES IN
THE WICBC , AND ALL THE REGIONAL
CRICKET BOARDS .
Obviously when this happens , those
currently serving on ALL Cricket Boards in the Region would be ineligible to serve . Because more than likely they will wilfully Sabotage the New Structures .
LET US NOT POUR NEW
WINE IN OLD BOTTLES .
BTW , in my opinion there must be Term Limitations for ALL OFFICES .
In reply to POINT
would already decide to vote for
Cameron therefore it is unnecessary
to hear from From Skerritt & Shallow .
You listened to the Mason and Guest show the other day, you seem to only get Mason saying Forde is for Cameron.
The other guy on the panel was the former president of the BCA and Barbados ambassador to the UN.
He stated clearly, that Barbados should not had a vote until they heard from both parties.
BTW, they heard from no one, neither DD nor Skerritt
In reply to InHindsight
Sammy needs to call up this Julian Charles and remind him what is at stake here. Or did he sell out for thirty pieces of silver?
In reply to InHindsight
check your hommie Judgement
In reply to InHindsight
So who breaks the tie should there be one? Shame on the Windwards , look like Nanthan have them under manners....Barbados done taken care of. Guyana? Well less said the better.
Openning
My statement is based on what Poster Maispwi stated in this Post . Was what he stated in Error ?????
In reply to POINT
would already decide to vote for
Cameron therefore it is unnecessary
to hear from From Skerritt & Shallow .
Thats a known fact, discussed via a live link from Cave Hill, and on CBC live.
You seem to be hearing what the poster wrote for the first time, after it being on the MB numerous times.
In reply to openning
Who breaks a 6-6 tie?
In reply to tc1
Dis ya InHindspite aint brightess spot pon neon sign...dottie perp likkle agenda is fi link he rep cheerleadin fi Big Id C to Bim..
Vor jess call he out ruff af
In reply to voiceofreason
I am up on the regulation.
What I learn last Tuesday evening, there is a difference with who the representative are.
The BCA once send a member and an associate member, and the associate broke away from the decision of the board, which seem to be legal, even though embarrassing.
In reply to voiceofreason
I can tell you that Charles's vote doesn't depend on Nanton. It's on his own prerogative.
St Lucia has benefited nada. Same for Windwards. Oh on account of Nanton Lockhart Sebastien, his hommie, is now a selector. Can you believe.
Sabo in the Windwards is known for his partiality and bias
In reply to tc1
Didn Dave identify de baseball player as a future captain
If there is one director with a pure conscience then for the sake of WI cricket you need to abondon the Cameron/Naton ticket.
If you want some perk and you give the guarantee that you'll support wholeheartedly the direction for change in system of governance in WI cricket
In reply to InHindsight
Julian who??? It's note easy to infiltrate an old boys club.
In reply to Courtesy
Conscience
There's momentum now. If and when Skerrit/Shallow pull this off. Then he lives to regret as providence will prove our position to be correct
In reply to InHindsight
Come on inHindsight...what conscience? Jamaica is a place where gang members rob and brutalize their own close relatives and admit it in court.
In reply to Courtesy
And because of that they will Skerrit/ Shallow
In reply to InHindsight
I have just received the breaking news that Cameron is in trouble. JCA is prepared to vote against him.
In reply to Courtesy
Hoping for WI cricket this is true.
Reported last night on SportsMax by Reds. A birdie told him so
In reply to InHindsight
I have never broken news here which is not correct. I trust my source and apologize to Chrissy.
In reply to Courtesy
We need to have a surrogate contact Charlo
I think it is ridiculous to say that JCA is insular to support Cameron.My view is that their reasoning in supporting Cameron might well be the same reasons that the Windwards and Guyana are supporting Cameron.These two countries have based their support for Cameron, not because they feel it is in the best long term interest of West Indies cricket but their own narrow interests.
Sadly that is our reality. The Head of the Guyana Cricket Board has absolutely no redeeming features.He is a despicable human being(human being being used with some hesitation)
Search
Live Scores
- no matches