The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Message Board Archives

Calling on Julian "Holder" Charles to....

 
InHindsight 2019-03-21 18:16:22 

...do the right thing and vote the Skerrit/Shallow ticket in CWI election.


big grin

 
openning 2019-03-21 18:21:17 

In reply to InHindsight
Why did you nominate or second Cameron?

 
InHindsight 2019-03-21 18:22:49 

In reply to openning

Ummmm

Tell me again?

lol

 
InHindsight 2019-03-21 18:24:45 

My position is purely in the interest of WI cricket


Let me take this opportunity to say that I like Mr Charles personally. A very fine respectable gentleman and former regional cricketer

 
openning 2019-03-21 18:35:03 

In reply to InHindsight

Guyana and the Windwards, the two culprits that nominated the DD, Leewards and T&T did the same for Skerritt.

 
Maispwi 2019-03-21 18:46:32 

In reply to openning

So Bim eh culprits too

A re­cent CWI re­lease said Cameron had se­cured the sup­port of four boards af­ter be­ing twice nom­i­nat­ed – first by the Wind­wards and Guyana Crick­et Board, and then by the Ja­maica Crick­et As­so­ci­a­tion and Bar­ba­dos.


Link

 
InHindsight 2019-03-21 18:49:31 

In reply to openning

Not too late to throw support behind Skerrit/Shallow

 
openning 2019-03-21 19:05:14 

In reply to Maispwi

So Bim eh culprits too

Bim will be a culprit, if they vote for Cameron.

 
Maispwi 2019-03-21 19:24:07 

In reply to openning

Conde say dat Bim have agreed to vote for Cameron

How­ev­er, Ri­ley said his board had tak­en a vote last month to sup­port Cameron and in­cum­bent vice pres­i­dent, Em­manuel Nan­than, mak­ing it un­nec­es­sary to ac­cept the re­quest from Sker­ritt and Shal­low.“Once the board de­cid­ed that they were sup­port­ing the in­cum­bents, that was it. You can’t come out and go against some­thing that has been agreed on a vote by the full BCA board,” Ri­ley told the Dai­ly Na­tion here.


Has there been a change?

 
openning 2019-03-21 19:37:29 

In reply to Maispwi

Conde say dat Bim have agreed to vote for Cameron

Wait until the act is committed, you can only be guilty after the jury verdict, the BCA will be guilty after the vote.
All we can do as of now, is give Cameron six unconfirmed votes, two each from the BCA, Windwards and GCA.
It is like a poll at this time.
BTW, I heard the BCA changed one of it voting delegate, not wanting anyone to go rogue on its board.

 
Maispwi 2019-03-21 19:58:58 

In reply to openning

So why you calling Guyana and Windwards culprits before de act when dey did de same ting dat Bim and Jamaica have done?

 
tc1 2019-03-21 20:13:55 

In reply to Maispwi

the only reason Skerrit is running is to protect the baseball player from Pybus

 
openning 2019-03-21 20:14:42 

In reply to Maispwi
Have you ever been part of an association that elect officials?
If you nominate or second someone, that mean you support the person for the job.
Had Guyana and the Windward decline, it would had been left to the JCA and the BCA.
It is obvious the JCA is not 100% committed to DD, it is the second time that body is not all in for him.

 
che 2019-03-21 20:25:07 

In reply to tc1

Vivi and clown prince fi pakis $cammy lookin fi ah food tuh...

Gwine b too close to call eh...

lol lol lol

 
InHindsight 2019-03-21 20:44:38 

In reply to tc1


Man speak intelligently

 
camos 2019-03-21 21:04:01 

In reply to openning

It is obvious the JCA is not 100% committed to DD, it is the second time that body is not all in for him.



Jamaica not getting anything.

 
POINT 2019-03-21 21:28:30 

In reply to Maispwi

If what You have stated is True , it is very interesting , That Barbados
would already decide to vote for
Cameron therefore it is unnecessary
to hear from From Skerritt & Shallow .

Imagine that Asinine Behaviour ; I do
not believe that is how Democracy works . Especially in Barbados , where
its inhabitants have always boasted
of being the most Educated Country in the Region .

I was under the impression that if
there are 2 Parties Contesting an
Election , it is incumbent that both
Parties get equal time to state why
the Barbadian Delegates , should after hearing both Both Teams , then after the Presentation of Both then ,decide which One they would cast their Vote for .

If those eligible to vote in Barbados , decide only to hear from
One side only ; and other Countries in the Region Mimic what Barbados states it will do ; My perspective is that this is Regional Disgrace .

This tangibly demonstrates why I continuously state that WE need
Completely New Structures in the WICBC ; and all the Regional Cricket Boards .

Every Freaking Day the actions of the Cricket Boards in the Region & the WICBC provide CONCRETE Evidence
that buttresses what I continuously
state in this Forum .

THERE NEEDS TO BE NEW STRUCTURES IN

THE WICBC , AND ALL THE REGIONAL

CRICKET BOARDS .

Obviously when this happens , those
currently serving on ALL Cricket Boards in the Region would be ineligible to serve . Because more than likely they will wilfully Sabotage the New Structures .

LET US NOT POUR NEW

WINE IN OLD BOTTLES .

BTW , in my opinion there must be Term Limitations for ALL OFFICES .

 
openning 2019-03-21 21:40:01 

In reply to POINT

If what You have stated is True , it is very interesting , That Barbados
would already decide to vote for
Cameron therefore it is unnecessary
to hear from From Skerritt & Shallow .

You listened to the Mason and Guest show the other day, you seem to only get Mason saying Forde is for Cameron.
The other guy on the panel was the former president of the BCA and Barbados ambassador to the UN.
He stated clearly, that Barbados should not had a vote until they heard from both parties.
BTW, they heard from no one, neither DD nor Skerritt

 
voiceofreason 2019-03-21 21:42:23 

In reply to InHindsight

Sammy needs to call up this Julian Charles and remind him what is at stake here. Or did he sell out for thirty pieces of silver?

 
tc1 2019-03-21 21:46:18 

In reply to InHindsight

check your hommie Judgement

 
voiceofreason 2019-03-21 21:46:45 

In reply to InHindsight
So who breaks the tie should there be one? Shame on the Windwards , look like Nanthan have them under manners....Barbados done taken care of. Guyana? Well less said the better.

 
POINT 2019-03-21 21:55:46 

Openning


My statement is based on what Poster Maispwi stated in this Post . Was what he stated in Error ?????

 
openning 2019-03-21 22:14:24 

In reply to POINT

If what You have stated is True , it is very interesting , That Barbados
would already decide to vote for
Cameron therefore it is unnecessary
to hear from From Skerritt & Shallow .

Thats a known fact, discussed via a live link from Cave Hill, and on CBC live.

Was what he stated in Error

You seem to be hearing what the poster wrote for the first time, after it being on the MB numerous times.

 
voiceofreason 2019-03-21 22:30:19 

In reply to openning

Who breaks a 6-6 tie?

 
che 2019-03-21 22:33:13 

In reply to tc1

Dis ya InHindspite aint brightess spot pon neon sign...dottie perp likkle agenda is fi link he rep cheerleadin fi Big Id C to Bim..

Vor jess call he out ruff af

lol lol lol

 
openning 2019-03-21 22:48:53 

In reply to voiceofreason

I am up on the regulation.
What I learn last Tuesday evening, there is a difference with who the representative are.
The BCA once send a member and an associate member, and the associate broke away from the decision of the board, which seem to be legal, even though embarrassing.

 
InHindsight 2019-03-22 07:47:57 

In reply to voiceofreason

I can tell you that Charles's vote doesn't depend on Nanton. It's on his own prerogative.

St Lucia has benefited nada. Same for Windwards. Oh on account of Nanton Lockhart Sebastien, his hommie, is now a selector. Can you believe.

Sabo in the Windwards is known for his partiality and bias

 
Maispwi 2019-03-22 11:01:13 

In reply to tc1

Didn Dave identify de baseball player as a future captain

 
InHindsight 2019-03-22 12:59:02 

If there is one director with a pure conscience then for the sake of WI cricket you need to abondon the Cameron/Naton ticket.

If you want some perk and you give the guarantee that you'll support wholeheartedly the direction for change in system of governance in WI cricket

 
Courtesy 2019-03-22 13:00:45 

In reply to InHindsight

lol lol lol

Julian who??? It's note easy to infiltrate an old boys club.

 
InHindsight 2019-03-22 13:05:59 

In reply to Courtesy

Conscience



lol lol lol

There's momentum now. If and when Skerrit/Shallow pull this off. Then he lives to regret as providence will prove our position to be correct

 
Courtesy 2019-03-22 13:08:27 

In reply to InHindsight

Come on inHindsight...what conscience? Jamaica is a place where gang members rob and brutalize their own close relatives and admit it in court.

big grin

 
InHindsight 2019-03-22 13:10:57 

In reply to Courtesy


And because of that they will Skerrit/ Shallow
big grin

 
Courtesy 2019-03-22 13:15:32 

In reply to InHindsight

I have just received the breaking news that Cameron is in trouble. JCA is prepared to vote against him.

 
InHindsight 2019-03-22 13:17:36 

In reply to Courtesy

Hoping for WI cricket this is true.


Reported last night on SportsMax by Reds. A birdie told him so big grin

 
Courtesy 2019-03-22 13:19:36 

In reply to InHindsight
I have never broken news here which is not correct. I trust my source and apologize to Chrissy.

 
InHindsight 2019-03-22 13:21:56 

In reply to Courtesy

We need to have a surrogate contact Charlo

 
Dukes 2019-03-23 10:11:05 

I think it is ridiculous to say that JCA is insular to support Cameron.My view is that their reasoning in supporting Cameron might well be the same reasons that the Windwards and Guyana are supporting Cameron.These two countries have based their support for Cameron, not because they feel it is in the best long term interest of West Indies cricket but their own narrow interests.
Sadly that is our reality. The Head of the Guyana Cricket Board has absolutely no redeeming features.He is a despicable human being(human being being used with some hesitation)