Let’s see what he says.
Message Board Archives
B-News: Mueller to break silence at 11:00 a.m
2019-05-29 13:35:15
2019-05-29 13:42:39
State what you think Mueller will say.
Will it be pro-Trump (i.e. take the air out of the Impeachment balloon) or pro-Impeachment ( i.e. give more impetus to the Impeachment drive)?
2019-05-29 13:46:58
In reply to Casper
How about telling the truth of the matter?
2019-05-29 13:48:06
In reply to Casper
Mueller is a skunt. he should have recommended either indictment or impeachment for obstruction of justice.
he bottled it mate just like Comey- pack of American jokers
2019-05-29 13:49:28
In reply to Casper
This could be explosive either way ----but could it be sterile, neutered? Interesting development - Does AG Barr still have his hands on the scale --- he is still Mueller’s boss
Interesting
2019-05-29 13:54:37
In reply to Casper
Yep. What's more after he speaks he can no longer deny the House request for him to show up at their hearing
2019-05-29 13:56:46
Put it to rest once and for all. 
Probably be more vague, ambiguous legalese open to interpretation.
2019-05-29 14:06:19
In reply to Runs
I totally agreed bare BS
2019-05-29 14:09:33
I wouldn't expect much from Mueller but at least glad that he is showing a pulse. I suspect it will be wrapped in Lawyer speak and leave you wondering why he bothered.
I wonder if its the republican Amash town hall meeting yesterday that raised him from the dead. Either way lets see what he says.
2019-05-29 14:21:29
In reply to Runs
Probably be more vague, ambiguous legalese open to interpretation.
He can't do that anymore. He would be crucified by the left and all those knowledgeable legal experts who have concluded that Trump obstructed justice.
But, as I have stated numerous times, a Republican is a Republican is a Republican. I trust Republicans as far as I can throw them, Mueller notwithstanding.
2019-05-29 14:23:15
After reading the Guardian about his statement I am even more convinced that he wont say anything of significance. He is only making the statement to avoid testifying in public. Let see. Really hope I am wrong though...cuz it said that its the statement that he drafted 3 indictments then trash them, that is resulting in this statement. Which could mean that the Whitehouse could find it more favorable and he gave them the heads up.
2019-05-29 14:27:49
Democrats on bended knees for something, anything bad to happen to Trump. Some even want a financial collapse 
2019-05-29 14:37:30
A statement of about 8 minutes expected. Let's hope it is not fluff or a waste of airtime, but something concrete.
2019-05-29 14:39:46
In reply to nitro
Democrats on bended knees for something, anything bad to happen to Trump. Some even want a financial collapse.
We just want the TRUTH; something Republicans can't bear to hear.
2019-05-29 14:45:46
In reply to Casper
Are you hoping dat the soap opera created by de Bernie or bust crew will end so quickly? What woud Vix say? 6 mo years?
2019-05-29 14:49:40
In reply to Casper
You do not need all of 8 minutes to say NO COLLUSION, NO CRIME HENCE NO OBSTRUCTION!
He had already sent out his huge report. Read and comprehend without your biased mindset!
2019-05-29 14:53:50
In reply to nitro
Calm down bro
What is the hissyfit all about
2019-05-29 14:57:07
In reply to Casper
Mueller will most likely pull a powen and sit on the fence!
2019-05-29 15:12:47
From the horse's mouth - the President obstructed justice, if he had not done so, I wouldv'e have said so.
2019-05-29 15:13:04
In reply to Runs
The written work "speaks for itself."
2019-05-29 15:13:12
More winning.. 
2019-05-29 15:13:56
Mueller seh only the fact that the idiot is the sitting pruhzedent prevented him from being charged with obstruction
#murca
2019-05-29 15:14:58
Casper will be reporting on the Impeachment Train. It is just warming up.
2019-05-29 15:22:16
In reply to Casper
the President obstructed justice, if he had not done so, I wouldv'e have said so.
He could’nt have said it any clearer
2019-05-29 15:25:40
In reply to nitro
If you read ir, it is damning
2019-05-29 15:25:46
In reply to Casper
Nothing new was said that was not already known.
2019-05-29 15:26:08
In reply to VIX
For once you are correct 
Could not charge him as per US Constitition BUT could not exonerate him. Ball tossed to Congress and or until he leaves office to then be indicted. Clearly he obstructed justice which is a crime.
Guy is telling Congress to do it’s ^%{{} job.
2019-05-29 15:34:58
Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so
2019-05-29 15:35:51
In reply to YoungWarrior
That is IT right there
2019-05-29 15:37:08
In reply to Runs
Guy is telling Congress to do it’s ^%{{} job
.
That's what I've been saying all along, forget about how it's going to affect the election and do your (Congress) freaking job.
2019-05-29 15:38:17
Where is the LT (Lying Tweet)?
Soon coming. Probably waiting for how FauxNew tell him to construct it.
2019-05-29 15:38:25
In reply to Runs
So he did commit a crime but cannot be indicted.
2019-05-29 15:40:09
In reply to YoungWarrior
yes, ...and only Congress can indict him. Over to Democrats; on to Impeachment.
2019-05-29 15:40:49
In reply to YoungWarrior
So he did commit a crime but cannot be indicted.
After he leave office but he certainly can be impeached.
2019-05-29 15:41:01
Its now up to Congress to do its job - Mueller has spoken - there is underlyng evidence, but it was not his call for the charging of the IDIOT. The justice dept does have the evidence to CONVICT Dump when he leaves Office!!! OR Congress can do it ASAP.
2019-05-29 15:42:16
"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime," he said.
Cannot be charged for obstruction when there was no crime.
2019-05-29 15:42:29
In reply to Casper
and only Congress can indict him
That would be DOJ's job.
The Congress can only impeach or recommend criminal charges.
2019-05-29 15:49:30
In reply to nitro
"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime," he said.
Qualify and state why, he did give the reason (s) in his press conference. Do not cherry pick, post his entire statement.
2019-05-29 15:51:41
In reply to black
Mueller OPENED the door even CLEARER to CONGRESS to do your JOBS .... impeach the asshole.
Or ... in a few years the DOJ can do it.
2019-05-29 15:55:38
In reply to nitro
Cannot be charged for obstruction when there was no crime
Nonsense. He clearly obstructed justice because he EXPECTED to be charged. He clearly didn't know which way the investigation was going to go.
2019-05-29 16:04:51
This is what the orange clown just wrote:
Nothing changes from the Mueller Report. There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed! Thank you.
What a moron!
2019-05-29 16:06:05
“If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that,” Mueller continued. “Under long-standing department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. ... Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”
Mueller is a real wuss. if you think the man committed a crime just say so. why couched it in such language when most Americans dont understand anything but plain speak
2019-05-29 16:06:36
In reply to YoungWarrior
Well he is up the creek without a paddle, spin as he likes.
2019-05-29 16:20:29
In reply to sudden
Mueller is a real wuss. if you think the man committed a crime just say so. why couched it in such language when most Americans dont understand anything but plain speak
He is saying that the President could not have defended himself since he would not have been indicted.
The solution would have been to prepare a separate report or guidelines for Congress.
2019-05-29 16:24:23
In reply to sudden
Because he does not want to influence the people who are to make that decision.
2019-05-29 16:27:02
SC could have said, we did not find any collusion and we could not conclude or charge with obstruction, however AG Barr and Deputy AG Rosenstein concluded that he did not and we accept that. So in all intents and purposes this is over.
That he did not say so, IS PROFOUND.
2019-05-29 16:30:18
In reply to black
He is saying that the President could not have defended himself since he would not have been indicted.
he really said --- why say a person commits a crime if you cant then go ahead and charge him because justice rules preclude doing so --- He did say, emphatically, that if he could say the president ‘did not’ commit a crime – then he would have said so
2019-05-29 16:30:59
In reply to black
clearly that is not what he said.
he said in plain words - if it was any other person but a sitting president he would have been indicted. if there was no evidence so to do i would have said so clearly. but there is a longstanding policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted but that does not affect impeachment which is our way of removing a sitting president for high crimes and misdemeanours
2019-05-29 16:33:35
In reply to birdseye
he really said --- why say a person commits a crime if you cant then go ahead and charge him because justice rules preclude doing so --- He did say, emphatically, that if he could say the president ‘did not’ commit a crime – then he would have said so
Yes.....so he is leaving it up to Congress but then the Repubs would put a different spin on it. The whole thing makes little sense.
2019-05-29 16:38:24
In reply to black
Justin Amash is the voice of truth for the GOP, speaks truth to power, do not bother what the rest says.
2019-05-29 16:42:36
In reply to Runs
It's not just Amash, all the Repubs know Trump obstructed justice but he (Amash) is the only one brave enough to speak out.
2019-05-29 16:47:54
In reply to black
The Dems have to uphold the Constitution as this batch of GOP obviously will not.
"...there were multiple, systemic efforts to interfere in our election. And that allegation deserves the attention of every American."
2019-05-29 16:51:43
In reply to Runs
Impeach him and forget about what the Senate is going to do. That is their job.
2019-05-29 16:53:39
In reply to black
Yes, of course it is. Will a Prosecutor refuse to bring the case to trial because he thinks the jury will acquit?
Such thinking is insane.
2019-05-29 16:58:43
Judge Napolitano of Faux News says
Judge Nap - “Effectively what Bob Mueller said is we had evidence that he committed a crime but we couldn't charge him because he's the president of United States -- This is even stronger than the language in his report” Judge Napolitano said.
“I think basically he’s saying the president can't be indicted otherwise we would have indicted him and we're not going to charge him with a crime because there's no forum in which for him… to refute the charges. But we could not say that he didn't commit a crime. Fill in the blank because we believe he did.”
2019-05-29 17:19:22
I cant tell which is the bigger wuss. Mueller or the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi. Democrats have all that they need to impeach, kick out, kick to the curb the president, further bolstered by Mueller statement today. To do nothing just for political expediency is an even bigger crime. But in a sense when Mueller sees what Barr and Trump doing with the Intelligence and law Enforcement agencies he aught to be a bit more forthcoming. For the country in which he lives and whose global reputation and leadership going down the drain and the general lawlessness of the administration, it aught to give him greater pause- as choosing not to say more, for whatever reason, put his country at greater risk.
2019-05-29 17:26:41
And I not sure what can be done about William Barr. I am not sure if they have a special Jail for him. I am not sure if he can be sanctioned or punished for the lies and misdirection that he has perpetuated on the American people. But he can not go unscathed and this is the second time in his career that he has done it and I hope it has finally caught up with him.
2019-05-29 17:35:28
In reply to Runs
Booker is calling on Congress to begin immediate impeachment proceedings.
I like Nancy but she is wrong on this.
2019-05-29 17:45:32
In reply to Casper
He can't do that anymore. He would be crucified by the left and all those knowledgeable legal experts who have concluded that Trump obstructed justice.
Proof that you are a joker
2019-05-29 17:55:19
In reply to Star
Proof that you are a joker
Why do you always provide input without an explanation?
2019-05-29 18:14:04
In reply to carl0002
And I not sure what can be done about William Barr
He can be impeached by the House and I don't think they need the Senate's approval for such action.
Yes, the process is virtually identical to impeaching the President but the Vice President will preside over the Senate in this instance.
2019-05-29 18:16:16
Barr has lied and covered up, he needs to go, unfit for the office himself.
2019-05-29 19:27:11
Here is Mueller .. and some reactions from his statement ---
What they are saying: Washington reacts to Mueller’s statement
2019-05-29 21:50:37
In reply to Runs
Mueller smashed down the lies - great press briefing with very short notice.
2019-05-29 21:51:21
In reply to Chrissy
not a man moved
2019-05-29 21:53:45
In reply to Runs
He caught them completely off guard - Barr is in Alaska
2019-05-29 21:57:05
In reply to Chrissy
He said nothing more than what was written in the report.
2019-05-29 21:57:55
In reply to Chrissy
Yep, heard that, imagine if this was him before the release of the report. Few people have read it even now.