under threat of a prison sentence and the case is going to be blown wide open.
And those who lie, have to worry about being exposed by someone who is willing to tell the truth.
This is going to be very interesting.
Message Board Archives
Someone is going to crack
In reply to black
Unlike they drink too much Kool-Aid and go down with the Corrupt One.
In reply to black
Boss lots of people cracked already and fed information to Deep Throat 2.0. Also, Double Agent Orange cracked and gave up the transcript. Only thing left is to fill in the blanks and then see how many Republicans in the Senate decide to follow the Orange One over the electoral cliff after he is impeached.
In reply to Walco
Pence advised against releasing but they panicked
More than 300 former national security and foreign policy officials signed a letter released Friday labeling President Trumps Ukraine actions a profound national security concern.
when?
In reply to Walco
Why didn't those people become whistleblowers, themselves?
Several things going on here.
1. They had to produce something because the complaint was looked at by the IG and approved to be sent up the chain.
2. The Orange fella thought he was smarter than everyone else and could explain his way out of any situation.
3. They were hoping to get the same reaction they got after the release of the Mueller report.
4. Giuliani corroborated the Ukraine meeting.
I disagree, information will have to be verified. under threat of perjury and imprisonment.
In reply to black
What do you think "fill the blanks" means?
In reply to Courtesy
I got that but it's not going to be that easy, many people are going to claim, executive privilege.
In reply to black
Then that will be added as obstruction of congress and added to the articles of impeachment.
In reply to black
In reply to Runs
Yes, Congress will have to lean on these guys, very hard.
In reply to Courtesy
Ok, you win.
I was just trying to say, it was not going to be as easy as he stated.
In reply to Courtesy
Here is his full quote. Cherry picking one line can convey different meaning. How does he know how many people cracked?
In reply to black
The above is known...persons giving information to the whistleblower and Trump released a summary of his convo. It has been reported on extensively.
How does quoting the complete post alter the context of your response?
Please don't bother to respond. Different day, same obfuscation and modus operandi.
In reply to Courtesy
Ultimately, his statement will be proven, correct but he made it seem like a foregone conclusion.
If you look at my lead post, me and Walco are basically saying the same thing, I only disagree about how easy he portrayed it to be.
What is so hard to understand about that?
In reply to black
Pituful Democrats. Cant win on the issues so they asking the Deep State for help.
Trump will win again, BIGLY!
In reply to nitro
You can yell, "deep state" until the cows come home, they cannot touch Trump if he is not going anything wrong.
Search
Live Scores
- no matches