England's way before being overturned.
Thank God for review, this is how they robbed us unmercilessly in the past. Bet all them would've been out if we were batting.
Message Board Archives
SMH - Dem 8 LBWs had all gone....and now...
In reply to LBW375
I noticed!
//
In reply to LBW375
Yep - 400 years of tiefing and more
Wavell Hinds would have been helped by DRS in 2000 when he got many atrocious decisions in England.
Based on de logic here it cud be said dat de WI umpire who had dat nightmare not so long ago was just making up for all de tiefing against us.
I was surprised dat ball tracking showed the ball to Burns straightening from dat angle of delivery. Most of dose balls just hold dere line and end up missing leg.
But aren't we not doing de same kinda profiling dat we accuse whites of doing to us?
In reply to Maispwi
But aren't we not doing de same kinda profiling dat we accuse whites of doing to us?
Another lbw by review
And Another one lol
In reply to LBW375
Sorry mate...
I am now seeing your post...
Same thing I raised about giving thanks for the Review System.
In reply to positiveg
You sounding like DJ Khaled now
Tell u
Anderson pitch it outside leg, Umpire up in it.
NOT OUT !
And another one....
In reply to LBW375
unbelievable!
To be fair I thought that was out.
In reply to NineMiles
I said out loud "pitching outside leg" seeing it live.
In reply to LBW375
Unbelievable indeed
In reply to LBW375
Unbelievable indeed
In reply to LBW375
But they know how fih thief John Campbell out?
In reply to Maispwi
Nah!
You would probably be too young to see the thieving in the Tied Test series in Australia or even the series where Michael Holding kicked down the stumps in disgust.
But then you should have certainly been able to see some really bad New Zealand umpiring in more recent years...
//
In reply to Ewart
"Black Trousers Teifs"...a phrase from my grandfather way back in the day
In reply to Chrissy
Is it intentional dishonesty or are they making genuine mistakes?
In reply to Star
Its called bias
Exists whether conscious or otherwise
In reply to Halliwell
If you know the review system is in place to overturn your decision if it is wrong, will you still intentionally give the wrong decision?
I don't think so.
The review system is not automatic, you have to request it and there is the "umpires call".
And it going look bias if a similar incident when we batting is given.
In reply to Star
You still have a game of chicken and 15 seconds to refer
In reply to Halliwell
I agree with you that it comes over as being biased but the umpires can also be seen as fools if they are doing this intentionally given that at the end of every game an analysis is done on their umpiring.
I like the way Campbell was playing until those 2 LBW decisions,it may have upset his confidence,he's confident and has aggression, and goes after the ball if it's there to be hit.I see him making runs in the series.He is the right man to open with Braffit.
In reply to Star
This is the very point Steve Bucknor made to Mason a few weeks ago.
None of them like to get it wrong...
you are messing with peoples careers...and now...messing with their own.
Richard the Umpire was horrible so far...most of those failed NOT OUT LBWs were his..and even the first one yesterday...that was still hitting...but he got the break to stick with his decision of NOT out.
And another one overturned
No ball but wouldve missed the stumps
Mikey Holding spoke about this at the start this morning. Atrocious umpiring.
In reply to LBW375
No it wouldn't.
In reply to natty_forever
Didnt ball tracking saw it going over ?
I'm working online while watching, am sure I saw that
My mistake, was hitting stumps
Search
Live Scores
- no matches