Will liberals move out of conservative states?
Was this an intended effect of the decision?
Turn purple states red, population shift.
Message Board Archives
Roe v. Wade intended consequence
2022-06-27 23:29:12
2022-06-28 00:50:22
In reply to maj
you assuming only liberals get abortions
2022-06-28 00:56:44
In reply to ray
Who are more outraged about this decision?
My previous question still stands.
2022-06-28 05:17:36
The silent minority, one out of four American women get at least one abortion. 30 percent of Americans...men and women oppose abortions but thanks to most of the pro-life men they have won the battle. Many of their wives have quietly gotten some of those abortions. Their outrage is hidden.
2022-06-28 07:01:18
In reply to Brerzerk
As of 2018..I'm sure the numbers are higher now.
Women have been more likely than men to identify as Democrats for decades, but today, 56 percent of women consider themselves Democrats or lean Democratic. The same is only true for 44 percent of men.
But answer the question..will it cause a population shift out of conservative states by Liberals? I mean who wants to live in a Nazi state?
2022-06-28 13:15:50
In reply to maj
An interesting outlook. Mind you, if that migration happens, then that might have a knock-on effect on the Electoral College votes. Colorado moves from 9 to 11, Missouri moves from 10 to 8, for example.
2022-06-28 13:29:00
In reply to maj the vaj
Actually ya dumbfcuk the intended consequence just might be that more liberals turn out to vote in the mid-terms in swing states.
No one gives a flying fcuk about red neck states and the dumbasses who live there.
2022-06-28 13:29:42
In reply to maj
This is not about abortion, it's about the right to choose. If the justices were following the will of the American people, they would not have arrived at this decision.
2022-06-28 13:30:22
In reply to ray
Exactly.
2022-06-28 13:40:29
In reply to black
You think it is the job of a judicial body to follow the 'will' of the people?
Lordy.
2022-06-28 13:47:48
In reply to Ayenmol
There are exceptions, such as human rights, discrimination, etc...but yes, that should be a consideration
2022-06-28 13:49:18
In reply to black
Ok boss....you actually doubling down...you really... lol.
Carry on.
2022-06-28 13:59:49
In reply to bdaTryangle
I don't believe the shift would be that dramatic.
But people are fleeing states like NY and CA for Tx and FL. If anything it might be net zero effect.
2022-06-28 14:00:49
In reply to SnoopDog
Dude you need a life so much hate in you. You must go thru boxes of Nutrament.
2022-06-28 14:01:01
In reply to Ayenmol
Guy, I get it, sometimes they have to act outside of popular opinion but to say that majority opinion does not matter, is foolishness
2022-06-28 14:03:42
In reply to black
Yes its about the right to choose and yes its abortion.
Their job is to interpret the Constitution
2022-06-28 14:14:26
In reply to Ayenmol
This is not Russia. In many cases, Judges make unpopular decisions to give minorities the rights that the majority, enjoys.
2022-06-28 14:24:47
In reply to maj the vaj
Their job is to interpret the Constitution
That's right dumbass. Their job isn't to take away a constitutional right like they repeatedly state when it comes to guns.
2022-06-28 14:29:08
In reply to SnoopDog
Well moron, the 2nd amendment is explicitly stated in the Constitution.
Really the right to have aboetions have taken away. Because thousands of abortions are happening right now in America seems to me the right is still there.
2022-06-28 14:31:56
In reply to maj the vaj
What do you think the 14th amendment is, stupid.
2022-06-28 14:32:51
In reply to maj
Because thousands of abortions are happening right now in America seems to me the right is still there
That right should be applied equally.
2022-06-28 14:34:10
In reply to maj the vaj
Because thousands of abortions are happening right now in America seems to me the right is still there.
Your level of abject stupidity knows no bottom.
Abortions might be happening Doofus, but it's no longer a constitutionally protected right thanks to your degenerate Republican hacks for judges.
2022-06-28 14:56:43
In reply to SnoopDog
The right to have an abortion was never a constitutional right. The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whom I admired, said this herself, and Roe v. Wade was decided on the wrong premise.
Ginsburg’s Roe commentary gave some on the left pause during her 1993 confirmation hearings. She was nominated two decades after Roe and one year after it was affirmed in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. And some worried she would be insufficiently supportive of that precedent.
2022-06-28 15:06:54
In reply to maj the vaj
Listen Dumbass. You can cherry pick quotes and opinions all you want but the fact is that Roe v Wade insured that abortion was a constitutionally protected right under the 14th amendment and that constitutional right was taken away.
2022-06-28 18:39:24
In reply to maj
Rethink what you wrote, and answer this. Thousands of murders are happening does that mean the 'right' to murder exist?
2022-06-29 00:18:53
In reply to Brerzerk
The Constitution gives rights to its citizens and restricts government from denying those rights.
Congress and States have the authority to create laws. Let them do such for abortion.
Everyone can agree murder is wrong, not everyone agrees abortion is not murder.
2022-06-29 01:33:21
it's going to be interesting what happens when a woman gets a abortion in a state where it is legal but lives in a state where it is not will she be arrested when she goes back home if the authorities find out
2022-06-29 04:22:02
In reply to velo
What about the companies that fund them?
2022-06-29 15:00:08
it is hard to believe that people riot and threaten SCOTUS judegs just to commit infanticide
2022-06-29 15:03:00
In reply to nickoutr
Per Dems, infanticide is healthcare and great for the economy
Search
Live Scores
- no matches