serves no purpose
Message Board Archives
brooks hadda be a quota player
2023-03-21 12:59:44
2023-03-21 13:17:30
In reply to Jumpstart
What about Odean Smith?
He cannot bat, cannot bowl.
2023-03-21 13:23:31
In reply to openning
What about Odean Smith?
That does not answer the statement about Brookls and is in fact a tacit admission that you are unable to defend Brooks.
2023-03-21 13:41:30
Brooks just holding the spot for the best #3 in the region..... big batsman Reifer 
2023-03-21 13:51:14
In reply to Dukes
Why would I defend Books today?
Doc, Oval and I was writing about Brooks since his U19 days.
I would be repeating my self if I commented on him.
I see absolutely nothing in Smith, neither of them should be on any International team.
2023-03-21 13:57:57
In reply to openning
Agreed. Neither of them. They bring no value to the team.
2023-03-21 13:58:40
In reply to Jumpstart
brooks hadda be a quota player.....serves no purpose
De man seh he does mek love to de ball.
2023-03-21 14:22:14
In reply to openning
you're right....odean is awful.....plays like he has a red bean between his ears. He's not even trying to have a strategy when he's bowling. but that does not make brooks worthy of his place. both need to go
2023-03-21 14:25:33
In reply to SnoopDog
De man seh he does mek love to de ball.
lol. i almost sure dais not what CWI paying him for. they need to bring back hety...brooks clearly doh have it
2023-03-21 14:26:57
In reply to Jumpstart
allyuh love to give bajans heat everyday nah
2023-03-21 14:27:55
Odean is strictly a T20 player at this stage. His skillset, and lack of, says so. The blame for his inclusion in this form of the game should rest with the Selectors. Not Odean. He was called to perform.
Brooks, on the other hand, is a disappointment.
2023-03-21 14:51:04
In reply to SnoopDog
De man seh he does mek love to de ball. lol
Mussee his own balls now
2023-03-21 14:52:49
In reply to DirtyDan
Odean is strictly a T20 player at this stage. His skillset, and lack of, says so. The blame for his inclusion in this form of the game should rest with the Selectors. Not Odean. He was called to perform.
Brooks, on the other hand, is a disappointment.
Brooks, on the other hand, is a disappointment.
homie odean does not even have a standout T20 performance. not saying he's talentless, but clearly he aint ready yet. it could be the dre rus comparisons are weighing on him, but he should realize he is nowhere near andre russell as yet
2023-03-22 08:40:16
In reply to Dukes
It answers the statement if it is addressing "quota" reference. With so much mediocrity around wi cricket I dont know why such language is necessary
2023-03-22 10:48:31
In reply to Jumpstart
how could Brooks, a bajan, be a quota pick, when Bim has for the most part provided a majority of WI players?
if anything, Brooks continued a trend
if Brooks came from anywhere but Bim, Guy or Ja and given his returns, yes, whether he could be considered a quota pick would be a legitimate question?
2023-03-22 10:57:04
In reply to Dukes
That does not answer the statement about Brookls and is in fact a tacit admission that you are unable to defend Brooks.
why should any Bajan (besides the bajan selectors) have to defend Brooks' selection?
Search
Live Scores
- no matches