In reply to Brerzerk
Your comment is that:-
Ah doan care if ah get ban' but Bolls is a RACIST and many because they are unaware of their implicit biases even of dem owna self, blindly, unwittingly follow him dung di rabbit hole.
Yessiday a man seh Bavuma keeping out a better player Hendricks when Bavuma's ODI record is significantly better than Hendricks. Ah tell Yuh!!!
I can read and this statements is not only implicit, but specific
to wit "and many because they are unaware of their implicit biases even of dem owna self, blindly, unwittingly follow him dung di rabbit hole".
Bolls, or anyone in agreement with him about Bavuma pending resignation
(base solely on this call for resignation) is not racist (consciously or subconsciously)
That is my thesis, my point, my response... to your accusation of racism.
My call and many others call for Bavuma's resignation is simply,
as I explained in my previous post.
While I do not disagree with Affirmative Actions methodologies,
I still think Bavuma should resign as ODI cappo.
I believe that RSA needs the affirmative actions typologies to
assist in bring some measure of equality to its cricket.
However, when someone under-performs, they should resign as cappo.
I can think of many instances of the cappo in the other 3 semifinalist
aiding their team to win a match or two or 3 or 4.
I honestly cannot think of one brilliant tactical move by Bavuma in this World Cup
I can think of 8 times his dismissal place the RSA in early crisis mode
Thanks to the brilliance of the other top order players
they recovered most of the times.
Bottom-line, back to my thesis, 'calling for Bavuma's resignation as cappo does not make one racist'
The justification is spelled out in my previous post.