debut: 3/2/03
17,664 runs
Higher standard for Yardies or commentators' curse?
- edited -
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Why Was McKenzie Dropped?
debut: 5/26/04
94,420 runs
In reply to XDFIX
he looked way out of sorts and his replacement at least looked more at ease
back to the drawing board
he looked way out of sorts and his replacement at least looked more at ease
back to the drawing board
debut: 11/2/09
12,086 runs
Lol... well this didn't go as planned 
You expected people to support you on this?
McKenzie was rightfully dropped! Get over it.
You expected people to support you on this?
McKenzie was rightfully dropped! Get over it.
debut: 12/26/07
33,930 runs
In reply to XDFIX
Unlike when he played down under in Ozz, he looked out of sorts against the swinging ball in England.
We didn't want to chance a repeat of the latter before his home crowd(s), so we saved him (and us) the probable embarrassment.
All's good.
Why Was McKenzie Dropped?
Unlike when he played down under in Ozz, he looked out of sorts against the swinging ball in England.
We didn't want to chance a repeat of the latter before his home crowd(s), so we saved him (and us) the probable embarrassment.
All's good.
- edited -
debut: 8/25/09
1,237 runs
better questions why was he not played in the warm up match? Is it a permanent discard?
debut: 2/17/03
2,755 runs
Jamaica has been ostracize by cwi
This has been going on for a long time
This is the final nail in the coffin
This has been going on for a long time
This is the final nail in the coffin
debut: 3/2/03
17,664 runs
In reply to anthonyp
I am more concerned with getting over that defeat ‘irregardless’ of the replacement
I am more concerned with getting over that defeat ‘irregardless’ of the replacement
debut: 12/26/07
33,930 runs
In reply to XDFIX
Yes, for the mere fact that the team (squad and all) was Yardiless.
The head coach's head is next on the chopping block.
Is the team better off without him?
Yes, for the mere fact that the team (squad and all) was Yardiless.
The head coach's head is next on the chopping block.
debut: 11/1/13
13,762 runs
A change or 2 must happen for the third test,one change for certain is Kirk.Mc.Kenzie must replace K.Cartey.I sort of think about M.Louis to be replaced with Solozano,our bowling looks good for now.
debut: 8/9/14
18,191 runs
In reply to granite
I believe this is a 2 test series. Thus SA won the series 1-0?
I believe this is a 2 test series. Thus SA won the series 1-0?
debut: 11/29/02
26,583 runs
In reply to XDFIX
Didn't McKenzie average 35 v Australia ?
They dropped Bonner (avg 38 ), Bravo (avg 36) & Blackwood (avg 31) and went to a whole new middle order. They could've transitioned Carty/Athanaze/Hodge slowly with the more productive crew
Didn't McKenzie average 35 v Australia ?
They dropped Bonner (avg 38 ), Bravo (avg 36) & Blackwood (avg 31) and went to a whole new middle order. They could've transitioned Carty/Athanaze/Hodge slowly with the more productive crew
- edited -
debut: 11/1/13
13,762 runs
In reply to Emir
I wasn't aware but I feel Mc.Kenzie was unfairly treated like so many in past selections,sometimes you don't understand how and why, LBW375 explained.
I wasn't aware but I feel Mc.Kenzie was unfairly treated like so many in past selections,sometimes you don't understand how and why, LBW375 explained.
debut: 11/29/02
26,583 runs
WIvSA test series average: Batting
Holder 121 runs @ 61
Warrican 60 runs @ 60
Carty 116 runs @ 29
Athanaze 111 runs @ 28
Hodge 87 runs @ 22
Motie 56 runs @ 19
Joseph 36 runs @ 18
Braithwaite 63 runs @ 16
Louis 48 runs @ 12
Da Silva 34 runs @ 11
Roach 8 runs @ 8
Seales 8 runs @ 3
Holder 121 runs @ 61
Warrican 60 runs @ 60
Carty 116 runs @ 29
Athanaze 111 runs @ 28
Hodge 87 runs @ 22
Motie 56 runs @ 19
Joseph 36 runs @ 18
Braithwaite 63 runs @ 16
Louis 48 runs @ 12
Da Silva 34 runs @ 11
Roach 8 runs @ 8
Seales 8 runs @ 3
debut: 11/15/02
20,373 runs
In reply to XDFIX
Mckenzie deserves a drop after the Hingland series. He had no form going into the series. He will bounce back better than before. The talent is there. There are no world beaters on this current squad/team. Brathwaite gotta go!! We have supporting players on this team. No world beaters. No leadership nor confident players.
Mckenzie deserves a drop after the Hingland series. He had no form going into the series. He will bounce back better than before. The talent is there. There are no world beaters on this current squad/team. Brathwaite gotta go!! We have supporting players on this team. No world beaters. No leadership nor confident players.
debut: 2/22/04
8,195 runs
In reply to XDFIX
What was McKenzie claim to fame that got him on the team first?
How did he look in the last windies championship?
How did he look in Hingland?
Why was Tage and Macaskie dropped but you think McKenzie should stay?
His drop is deserved.
Others' coming soon, starting with Braffit as cappo.
What was McKenzie claim to fame that got him on the team first?
How did he look in the last windies championship?
How did he look in Hingland?
Why was Tage and Macaskie dropped but you think McKenzie should stay?
His drop is deserved.
Others' coming soon, starting with Braffit as cappo.
- edited -
debut: 4/28/03
59,473 runs
Because he had pis poor scores and looked like a deer in headlights.
- edited -
debut: 12/22/15
7,623 runs
In reply to granite
After McKenzie shouldered the batting for West Indies against Australia, can you imagined that the young player was dropped after only one test failure. How do we expect our young players to develop? Considering that his replacements have proven to be no better than him.
After McKenzie shouldered the batting for West Indies against Australia, can you imagined that the young player was dropped after only one test failure. How do we expect our young players to develop? Considering that his replacements have proven to be no better than him.
debut: 2/2/23
1,596 runs
In reply to Slipfeeler
Come on, man. Shouldered the batting????? We really have low expectations when a man who averages under 35 is stated as shouldering the batting. All he did was to do slightly better than the rest of the poor WI batting. McKenzie was not dropped after one test failure. He was dropped after a failure for the entire FC season and then in 3 tests in which he averaged 5 or less. If anyone ever deserved a drop, it was McKenzie. I am sure if you call him up, he would not dispute that.
Come on, man. Shouldered the batting????? We really have low expectations when a man who averages under 35 is stated as shouldering the batting. All he did was to do slightly better than the rest of the poor WI batting. McKenzie was not dropped after one test failure. He was dropped after a failure for the entire FC season and then in 3 tests in which he averaged 5 or less. If anyone ever deserved a drop, it was McKenzie. I am sure if you call him up, he would not dispute that.
debut: 12/22/15
7,623 runs
In reply to PalsofMine
The reality was that like Nash, he too was dropped after one test failure, it’s like they cannot wait to drop Yardies, just in case they come good next series!!
The reality was that like Nash, he too was dropped after one test failure, it’s like they cannot wait to drop Yardies, just in case they come good next series!!
debut: 4/28/03
59,473 runs
In reply to Slipfeeler
Nash. If McKenzie could bat like Nash I would join the crusade. And he ugly, remember what goes for one goes for all.
Nash. If McKenzie could bat like Nash I would join the crusade. And he ugly, remember what goes for one goes for all.
- edited -
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Search
Live Scores
- no matches