debut: 8/9/14
18,191 runs
I did not believe anyone person or organization could have been more low than Bassarath.
Get this, they are an inherent and equal part of the CWI. They now sue CWI- so suing themselves, claimed the appointment/selection of Bassrath was not transparent etc etc. They got a jokey Guyanese court and judge to preside, he promptly rules in GCB favor. A qualified judge would have pulled a Judge Judy on dem and chase their arwse out of the court.
CWI decided against appealing, instead they threw the ball at the GCB and called another election. Turned out GCB did not nominate a candidate, so even if one vote was given to Bassarath, he would have still won.
Folks, they are all dotish-duncy dunderheads and killing our cricket, but some seems to be more duncy- dotish-dunderheads than others.
This is how Vaneisa Baksh puts it
Get this, they are an inherent and equal part of the CWI. They now sue CWI- so suing themselves, claimed the appointment/selection of Bassrath was not transparent etc etc. They got a jokey Guyanese court and judge to preside, he promptly rules in GCB favor. A qualified judge would have pulled a Judge Judy on dem and chase their arwse out of the court.
CWI decided against appealing, instead they threw the ball at the GCB and called another election. Turned out GCB did not nominate a candidate, so even if one vote was given to Bassarath, he would have still won.
Folks, they are all dotish-duncy dunderheads and killing our cricket, but some seems to be more duncy- dotish-dunderheads than others.
This is how Vaneisa Baksh puts it
While I am on the subject of cricket, it is bizarre that the mess at Cricket West Indies (CWI) regarding the validity of vice-president Azim Bassarath’s position has come to the juncture it has. With the Guyana Cricket Board (GCB) issuing a legal challenge, and CWI first opting to appeal the ruling, then deciding they would hold an election in September, it turns out that Bassarath is the only nominee for the post. Didn’t the GCB think to offer a candidate? The whole thing is such an absurdity; it suggests that the pronouncements about keeping with “the highest standards of democratic principles and transparency” are nothing more than fluff.
- edited -
