debut: 2/16/17
37,870 runs
If you have a problem with attention span ..this is not for you.
Look for shorter comments on other threads ...Thanks Sarge
Look for shorter comments on other threads ...Thanks Sarge
The Idiocy of Donald and His Sons on Tariffs
The discussion surrounding tariffs in the United States has taken a controversial turn, especially with remarks made by Eric Trump. "In a recent appearance of Fox , Eric Trump seemed to conflate tariffs with sanctions, targeting Mexico, Canada, and China as the culprits in a misguided narrative that suggests these nations are directly responsible for the influx of illegal drugs into America." His statements encapsulate a fundamental misunderstanding of how tariffs operate and their broader economic implications. Let us dissect the rhetoric surrounding tariffs, evaluate the potential consequences for American consumers, and explore the political motivations driving such discussions.
At the core of Eric Trump's statements lies a significant misunderstanding of what tariffs are and who bears the burden of these financial tools. Tariffs are essentially taxes imposed by a government on imported goods, which are intended to protect domestic industries by making foreign products more expensive. However, the reality is starkly different: the costs associated with these tariffs are ultimately passed on to American consumers. For instance, if the Trump administration were to enact a 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico, as proposed, the immediate effect would not be felt by those countries but rather by U.S. consumers who would face higher prices at the grocery store or when purchasing construction materials.
This is not merely conjecture; economists have long warned that such protective measures can lead to an increase in consumer prices. The implications are clear when we consider that approximately 90 percent of avocados consumed in the U.S. come from Mexico. If tariffs were applied, Food and fuel chains would be disrupted. Auto parts would become scarce. In a few weeks , Americans may run out of Grocery and gas prices could surge, impacting not just consumers but also businesses that rely on these imports. The construction industry would face similar challenges, Canada exports 4 billion daily with materials like lumber and cement soaring as tariffs squeeze supply chains already under pressure. Homes prices will soar.During Trump tenure a Free trade agreement was signed between USA , Canada and Mexico
Eric Trump’s aggressive rhetoric targeting foreign nations as the source of America’s drug crisis plays into a larger narrative that seeks to simplify complex issues. By framing tariffs as a solution to illegal immigration and drug trafficking, there is a deliberate attempt to distract from the more nuanced realities of these crises. The reality is that drug trafficking is a multifaceted problem requiring comprehensive solutions that go beyond imposing tariffs on the countries from which these goods are imported. Instead, this rhetoric serves to galvanize a political base by instilling fear and anger towards foreign nations, diverting attention from the intricate domestic policies that could be more effective in tackling these pressing issues.
Moreover, it is important to remember that tariffs can lead to retaliatory measures from the targeted nations. For example, if Canada and Mexico respond with their own tariffs on U.S. goods, American exporters would face significant hurdles, further exacerbating the economic strain on U.S. industries. The interplay between domestic policy and international relations is delicate, and simplistic solutions like tariffs can result in a tit-for-tat scenario that harms American businesses and consumers alike.
America's economy is built on global trade.The daily trade between the U.S. and Mexico amounts to nearly $1.8 billion, with countless American jobs reliant on this relationship. Imposing tariffs as a means to curb illegal activity is not only shortsighted but also economically damaging. The potential for increased costs on everyday goods is compounded by the reality that the American economy thrives on interconnectedness. By disrupting these relationships, the very consumers that Eric Trump claims to protect may find themselves facing higher prices and diminished access to goods.
Furthermore, the assertion that tariffs could help American companies overlook the reality that many of these businesses rely on imported materials and goods to maintain their operations. When faced with increased costs due to tariffs, companies may either absorb these expenses, thereby reducing their profit margins, or pass them on to consumers, leading to inflated prices for everyone. This cycle creates a paradox where the very individuals who may support such tariffs due to a desire for lower prices could end up paying much more for their everyday needs.
As the conversation around tariffs continues to unfold, it is imperative to navigate these discussions with a clear understanding of the economic realities at play. The rhetoric espoused by figures like Eric Trump, while politically charged, often misses the mark when it comes to addressing the complexities of trade, immigration, and drug trafficking. Instead of offering simplistic solutions that may resonate with certain audiences, it is crucial to engage in informed discussions that recognize the interconnected nature of global economies.
In the end, let the decision-makers weigh the implications of their policies carefully. Ignorance on the topic of tariffs can lead to significant repercussions for American consumers and businesses alike. The stakes are high, and it is the responsibility of both politicians and citizens to ensure that the dialogue surrounding tariffs is rooted in fact, not just fervent rhetoric. As the saying goes, "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." In the case of tariffs, it is a lesson that could cost everyone dearly.
Sarge
- edited -