debut: 2/16/17
38,732 runs
The Myth of Tariffs: An Analysis of the Impact of Tariffs from Canada, Mexico, and China on the US Trade Deficit and Debt
The imposition of tariffs on imported goods from Canada, Mexico, and China has been touted as a means to reduce the US trade deficit and pay down its debt.
However, a closer examination of the impact of these tariffs reveals a flawed approach that is unlikely to achieve its intended goals.
Canada
Tariffs on Canadian goods: The US imposed tariffs on Canadian goods, including steel, aluminium, and lumber, in 2018. However, these tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit with Canada.
Retaliation: Canada retaliated with tariffs on US goods, including agricultural products, whisky, and tobacco. This will lead to a decline in US exports to Canada, offsetting any gains from reduced imports.
Impact on US industries: The tariffs have harmed US industries that rely on Canadian imports, such as the automotive and aerospace sectors. These industries have faced increased costs and reduced competitiveness, will lead to job losses and decreased economic growth.
Mexico
Tariffs on Mexican goods: The US applied tariffs on Mexican goods, including steel, aluminium, and agricultural products, in 2019. However, these tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit with Mexico.
Retaliation: Mexico can retaliate with tariffs on US goods, including agricultural products, whisky, and tobacco. This will lead to a decline in US exports to Mexico, offsetting any gains from reduced imports.
Impact on US industries: The tariffs will harm US industries that rely on Mexican imports, such as the automotive and aerospace sectors. These industries have faced increased costs and reduced competitiveness, will lead to job losses and decreased economic growth.
China
Tariffs on Chinese goods: The US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, including electronics, machinery, and furniture, in 2018. However, these tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit with China.
Retaliation: China retaliated with tariffs on US goods, including agricultural products, whisky, and tobacco. This has led to a decline in US exports to China, offsetting any gains from reduced imports.China, the largest buyer of US soybeans, imposed retaliatory tariffs on US soybean imports, leading to a 60% decline in US soybean exports to China.The tariffs have not been effective; instead, US imports from other countries, such as Vietnam and Mexico, have increased, offsetting any reductions in imports from China.
Impact on US industries: The tariffs have harmed US industries that rely on Chinese imports, such as the technology and retail sectors. These industries have faced increased costs and reduced competitiveness, leading to job losses and decreased economic growth.
Impact on the US Trade Deficit
Limited impact: The tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit. The US trade deficit with these countries has remained relatively stable, despite the imposition of tariffs.
Trade diversion: The tariffs have led to trade diversion, where imports from one country are replaced by imports from another country. This has offset any gains from reduced imports from Canada, Mexico, and China.
Impact on the US Debt
No impact: The tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China have had no impact on reducing the US debt. Tariffs are unlikely to have a significant impact on paying down the US debt, as the revenue generated from tariffs is relatively small compared to the overall size of the debt. In 2020, the US government collected $72 billion in tariff revenue, a fraction of the $3.1 trillion budget deficit.
Increased costs: The tariffs have increased costs for US businesses and consumers, leading to reduced economic growth and increased debt.For example, the tariff on washing machines led to a 12% increase in prices.
The imposition of tariffs on imported goods from Canada, Mexico, and China has been a flawed approach that has not achieved its intended goals. The tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit and have not reduced the US debt. Instead, the tariffs have harmed US industries, led to retaliation, and increased costs for US businesses and consumers.
Recommendations for the Donald' Reform of the Tax Code:
Reform the tax code to encourage domestic savings and investment, rather than relying on tariffs to reduce the trade deficit.
Promote exports: Promote US exports through investments in education, infrastructure, and innovation, rather than relying on tariffs to reduce imports.
Address the strong dollar: Address the strong dollar, which has contributed to the US trade deficit, through monetary policy and exchange rate management.
Invest in trade agreements: Invest in trade agreements that promote free and fair trade, rather than relying on tariffs to protect domestic industries.
Sarge...
The imposition of tariffs on imported goods from Canada, Mexico, and China has been touted as a means to reduce the US trade deficit and pay down its debt.
However, a closer examination of the impact of these tariffs reveals a flawed approach that is unlikely to achieve its intended goals.
Canada
Tariffs on Canadian goods: The US imposed tariffs on Canadian goods, including steel, aluminium, and lumber, in 2018. However, these tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit with Canada.
Retaliation: Canada retaliated with tariffs on US goods, including agricultural products, whisky, and tobacco. This will lead to a decline in US exports to Canada, offsetting any gains from reduced imports.
Impact on US industries: The tariffs have harmed US industries that rely on Canadian imports, such as the automotive and aerospace sectors. These industries have faced increased costs and reduced competitiveness, will lead to job losses and decreased economic growth.
Mexico
Tariffs on Mexican goods: The US applied tariffs on Mexican goods, including steel, aluminium, and agricultural products, in 2019. However, these tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit with Mexico.
Retaliation: Mexico can retaliate with tariffs on US goods, including agricultural products, whisky, and tobacco. This will lead to a decline in US exports to Mexico, offsetting any gains from reduced imports.
Impact on US industries: The tariffs will harm US industries that rely on Mexican imports, such as the automotive and aerospace sectors. These industries have faced increased costs and reduced competitiveness, will lead to job losses and decreased economic growth.
China
Tariffs on Chinese goods: The US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, including electronics, machinery, and furniture, in 2018. However, these tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit with China.
Retaliation: China retaliated with tariffs on US goods, including agricultural products, whisky, and tobacco. This has led to a decline in US exports to China, offsetting any gains from reduced imports.China, the largest buyer of US soybeans, imposed retaliatory tariffs on US soybean imports, leading to a 60% decline in US soybean exports to China.The tariffs have not been effective; instead, US imports from other countries, such as Vietnam and Mexico, have increased, offsetting any reductions in imports from China.
Impact on US industries: The tariffs have harmed US industries that rely on Chinese imports, such as the technology and retail sectors. These industries have faced increased costs and reduced competitiveness, leading to job losses and decreased economic growth.
Impact on the US Trade Deficit
Limited impact: The tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit. The US trade deficit with these countries has remained relatively stable, despite the imposition of tariffs.
Trade diversion: The tariffs have led to trade diversion, where imports from one country are replaced by imports from another country. This has offset any gains from reduced imports from Canada, Mexico, and China.
Impact on the US Debt
No impact: The tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China have had no impact on reducing the US debt. Tariffs are unlikely to have a significant impact on paying down the US debt, as the revenue generated from tariffs is relatively small compared to the overall size of the debt. In 2020, the US government collected $72 billion in tariff revenue, a fraction of the $3.1 trillion budget deficit.
Increased costs: The tariffs have increased costs for US businesses and consumers, leading to reduced economic growth and increased debt.For example, the tariff on washing machines led to a 12% increase in prices.
The imposition of tariffs on imported goods from Canada, Mexico, and China has been a flawed approach that has not achieved its intended goals. The tariffs have had a limited impact on reducing the US trade deficit and have not reduced the US debt. Instead, the tariffs have harmed US industries, led to retaliation, and increased costs for US businesses and consumers.
Recommendations for the Donald' Reform of the Tax Code:
Reform the tax code to encourage domestic savings and investment, rather than relying on tariffs to reduce the trade deficit.
Promote exports: Promote US exports through investments in education, infrastructure, and innovation, rather than relying on tariffs to reduce imports.
Address the strong dollar: Address the strong dollar, which has contributed to the US trade deficit, through monetary policy and exchange rate management.
Invest in trade agreements: Invest in trade agreements that promote free and fair trade, rather than relying on tariffs to protect domestic industries.
Sarge...
- edited -
