debut: 1/11/24
51 runs
In reply to Chrissy
Oh dear—what an unfortunate response. I had hoped to shed light on something that has been hiding in plain sight, not to provoke defensiveness. But if I struck a nerve, perhaps it’s worth asking why. Next time before you preach values you clearly struggle to embody consider the weight of the history you ignore so casually.
Muhammad Ali did not change his name from Cassius Clay on a whim. He rejected what he called his “slave name”. A name passed down from generations of oppression imposed by a system that robbed people of their identity and dignity. He was so brave and correct in doing that. In choosing Muhammad Ali he reclaimed his autonomy, his faith, and his voice. It was a bold act of resistance and a declaration of self definition in a world that tried to define him otherwise. Clearly it looks like you are more comfortable with what Muhammed Ali would call the SLAVE name you have and that too is your prerogative.
He hoped that others especially those still clinging to inherited hierarchies and aristocratic illusions might wake up and take heed. The message was not subtle and if you missed it, it was not for lack of clarity, but was for lack of willingness to listen and take action to respect the ancestors. Remember you have always championed and even built a reputation around radical African thoughts after all, which is admirable. History does not just ask us to remember, it demands that we reflect and better if we take action.
BTW - please avoid the vulgarity as it will tarnish your aristocratic persona.
Finally - if I did offend you in my opening post, it was not intentional but more to highlight a serious point on the topic of African marginalization. Please accept my humble apology.
Peace!!!!