India will bat till lunch....600
By Tea match will be over
By Tea match will be over
Forums >
The Rum Shop >
India vs West Indies, 1st Test [12.00 am ET]
India vs West Indies, 1st Test [12.00 am ET]
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 1:47 AM
Day 3: 1st Session
IND 448/5 d
WI 162 & 49/5 (23) CRR: 2.13
West Indies trail by 237 runs
Alick Athanaze 19(39)
Justin Greaves 1(
Ravindra Jadeja
9-3-23-3
IND 448/5 d
WI 162 & 49/5 (23) CRR: 2.13
West Indies trail by 237 runs
Alick Athanaze 19(39)
Justin Greaves 1(
Ravindra Jadeja
9-3-23-3
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 1:51 AM
John Campbell c Sai Sudharsan b Ravindra Jadeja 14[32
Tagenarine Chanderpaul c Nitish Reddy b Siraj 8[23
Brandon King c Rahul b Ravindra Jadeja 5[18
Roston Chase (c)b Kuldeep Yadav 1[4
Shai Hope (wk) c Yashasvi Jaiswal b Ravindra Jadeja 1[14
Tagenarine Chanderpaul c Nitish Reddy b Siraj 8[23
Brandon King c Rahul b Ravindra Jadeja 5[18
Roston Chase (c)b Kuldeep Yadav 1[4
Shai Hope (wk) c Yashasvi Jaiswal b Ravindra Jadeja 1[14
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 1:53 AM
Fall of Wickets
12-1 (Tagenarine Chanderpaul, 7.2), 24-2 (John Campbell, 10.1), 34-3 (Brandon King, 16.2), 35-4 (Roston Chase, 17.3), 46-5 (Shai Hope, 20.6)
12-1 (Tagenarine Chanderpaul, 7.2), 24-2 (John Campbell, 10.1), 34-3 (Brandon King, 16.2), 35-4 (Roston Chase, 17.3), 46-5 (Shai Hope, 20.6)
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 1:56 AM
Day 3: 1st Session
WI 59/5 (25) CRR: 2.36
West Indies trail by 227 runs
Alick Athanaze 24(4
Justin Greaves 6(11
WI 59/5 (25) CRR: 2.36
West Indies trail by 227 runs
Alick Athanaze 24(4
Justin Greaves 6(11
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 3:25 AM
In reply to Halliwell
Athanaze out for 38, playing against the spin...we have a long way to go, and a lot to learn about batsmanship.
WI 92-6
Greaves out for 25 now.
WI 98-7
Warrican out for a duck.
WI 98-8
Athanaze out for 38, playing against the spin...we have a long way to go, and a lot to learn about batsmanship.
WI 92-6
Greaves out for 25 now.
WI 98-7
Warrican out for a duck.
WI 98-8
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 3:43 AM
debut: May 14, '05
25,344 runs
In reply to mikesiva
I told myself he wouldn’t make 130 if we had the best of the strip and didn’t reach 180
So this performance STILL disappoints, despite lowered expectations.
I told myself he wouldn’t make 130 if we had the best of the strip and didn’t reach 180
So this performance STILL disappoints, despite lowered expectations.
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 6:40 AM
IND 448/5 d
WI 162 & 146
India won by an innings and 140 runs
PLAYER OF THE MATCH
Ravindra Jadeja
WI 162 & 146
India won by an innings and 140 runs
PLAYER OF THE MATCH
Ravindra Jadeja
Sat, Oct 4, '25 at 6:42 AM
[
b]Roston Chase: [/b]
When you win the toss and get bowled out for 160-odd it is tough to come back from that. Not the performance we were looking for. We have to bat better especially in India, you have to put a big first innings total on the board. Especially with the ball spinning, and pitch deteriorating, and going to the 4th and 5th day. I think that's where you really fall down, that's something we need to look at. Yeah, I had no problem with the decision. Everyone wanted to bat first, although there was some moisture in the wicket. But this is a Test wicket, and there's always going to have moisture on the first day of the Test match. But it's just for the batsmen to go in there and play themselves, and dig in deep, and play past that moisture. I didn't think the timing was off (referring to when they took the second new ball). I just thought that when we did take the second new ball, we didn't make the batsmen play enough. With that power on the ball, I think we need to test the batsmen's technique a bit more. Try to see if we can make them walk, and probably bowl a bit more at the stumps. Well, batting is the main problem. I mean, you only have two batsmen out there at the time. And in the field, you have all 11 players out there, so it's a bit easier as a fielding unit and a bowling unit. But I think it's just for the batsmen out there to form those partnerships. I think we probably didn't even get any 50-run partnerships. And in cricket, it's partnerships, whether you're batting or bowling. I just think we need to string some batting partnerships together, and that will make it easier for us.
When you win the toss and get bowled out for 160-odd it is tough to come back from that. Not the performance we were looking for. We have to bat better especially in India, you have to put a big first innings total on the board. Especially with the ball spinning, and pitch deteriorating, and going to the 4th and 5th day. I think that's where you really fall down, that's something we need to look at. Yeah, I had no problem with the decision. Everyone wanted to bat first, although there was some moisture in the wicket. But this is a Test wicket, and there's always going to have moisture on the first day of the Test match. But it's just for the batsmen to go in there and play themselves, and dig in deep, and play past that moisture. I didn't think the timing was off (referring to when they took the second new ball). I just thought that when we did take the second new ball, we didn't make the batsmen play enough. With that power on the ball, I think we need to test the batsmen's technique a bit more. Try to see if we can make them walk, and probably bowl a bit more at the stumps. Well, batting is the main problem. I mean, you only have two batsmen out there at the time. And in the field, you have all 11 players out there, so it's a bit easier as a fielding unit and a bowling unit. But I think it's just for the batsmen out there to form those partnerships. I think we probably didn't even get any 50-run partnerships. And in cricket, it's partnerships, whether you're batting or bowling. I just think we need to string some batting partnerships together, and that will make it easier for us.