debut: 2/16/17 4:58 AM
41,244 runs
Trini banned during pandemic: Court ruling more than a legal victory
Lorick and Joanne Pantin sued the State over its exemption policy. Lorick was stranded abroad for months in 2020. The Appeal Court found that the then PNM government’s failure to disclose the criteria used to determine who could return home was unconstitutional. In an interview following the ruling, Lorick said the judgment carries deep personal meaning. “It means closure, in some ways, but the weight of that experience will remain with me for life. It isn’t a time I like to reflect on, but these experiences become part of you. I’m glad that telling this story wasn’t in vain. Personally, it gives me peace of mind knowing that the legal struggle led to real accountability.”
Looking back, Lorick believes she may never have made it home had she not taken legal action. “Had I not commenced legal proceedings in 2020, I would likely have never been given priority on those initial repatriation flights, which at times felt like a lottery. I could have remained outside the borders even longer." The ruling cannot erase those wounds, but it does bring satisfaction in knowing it sets a precedent for future situations and hopefully compels officials to act appropriately next time.”
“No matter how compelling the emergency, the Executive must always be held accountable for infringements of the rights and freedoms of our citizens. As a people, we must demand nothing less,” the unanimous ruling of Justices of Appeal Nolan Bereaux, Mark Mohammed and Ronnie Boodoosingh noted. Former attorney general Anand Ramlogan, SC, led a team of attorneys for both women. He described the ruling as a watershed moment in TT’s legal history.“It provides solid reinforcement for the constitution and augurs well for the independence of the judiciary. It is a major development in our constitutional jurisprudence as it relates to the right to liberty and freedom of movement…This judgment clears the way for other citizens who were similarly circumstanced to sue for the breach of their constitutional rights.”
Lorick and Joanne Pantin sued the State over its exemption policy. Lorick was stranded abroad for months in 2020. The Appeal Court found that the then PNM government’s failure to disclose the criteria used to determine who could return home was unconstitutional. In an interview following the ruling, Lorick said the judgment carries deep personal meaning. “It means closure, in some ways, but the weight of that experience will remain with me for life. It isn’t a time I like to reflect on, but these experiences become part of you. I’m glad that telling this story wasn’t in vain. Personally, it gives me peace of mind knowing that the legal struggle led to real accountability.”
Looking back, Lorick believes she may never have made it home had she not taken legal action. “Had I not commenced legal proceedings in 2020, I would likely have never been given priority on those initial repatriation flights, which at times felt like a lottery. I could have remained outside the borders even longer." The ruling cannot erase those wounds, but it does bring satisfaction in knowing it sets a precedent for future situations and hopefully compels officials to act appropriately next time.”
“No matter how compelling the emergency, the Executive must always be held accountable for infringements of the rights and freedoms of our citizens. As a people, we must demand nothing less,” the unanimous ruling of Justices of Appeal Nolan Bereaux, Mark Mohammed and Ronnie Boodoosingh noted. Former attorney general Anand Ramlogan, SC, led a team of attorneys for both women. He described the ruling as a watershed moment in TT’s legal history.“It provides solid reinforcement for the constitution and augurs well for the independence of the judiciary. It is a major development in our constitutional jurisprudence as it relates to the right to liberty and freedom of movement…This judgment clears the way for other citizens who were similarly circumstanced to sue for the breach of their constitutional rights.”
- edited -