CaribbeanCricket.com

The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Forums > The Rum Shop > How Cricket West Indies has destroyed WI Cricket

How Cricket West Indies has destroyed WI Cricket

Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 6:45 AM
How Cricket West Indies Has Destroyed West Indies Cricket

The decline of West Indies cricket is not a natural fall from grace but the product of decades of mismanagement, incompetence, and misplaced priorities by Cricket West Indies (CWI). Once the most feared and respected cricketing force in the world, the West Indies now languish near the bottom of the international ladder. This collapse cannot be blamed on talent, for the Caribbean still produces cricketers of skill and promise. Instead, it is the governing body’s failure to manage, nurture, and respect that talent which has brought West Indies cricket to its knees.

At the core of this failure lies chronic incompetence. Rather than instituting structures to rebuild the game at all levels, CWI has often operated like a private club, riddled with nepotism and favoritism. Decisions about selection, administration, and coaching appointments frequently appear to be made not on merit but on personal ties and political considerations. A glaring example is the repeated appointment of unqualified coaches. Instead of hiring experienced individuals with proven records in red-ball cricket or international management, CWI has installed coaches lacking both the credentials and the gravitas to command a professional dressing room. Worse still, the current coach has been handed sweeping authority over selection and strategy, operating with almost no accountability. Such unchecked power has resulted in inconsistent team policies, poor man-management, and a steady erosion of discipline and structure within the squad.

The treatment of players provides further evidence of this dysfunction. Players like Shiv Chanderpaul, Ramnaresh Sarwan, Brendan Nash, Marlon Samuels, and of more recent vintage, Darren Bravo, Nkrumah Bonner, Jermaine Blackwood, Kraigg Brathwaite, and Kieran Powell have either been prematurely discarded or sidelined without clear explanation. These are players who have, at various points, shouldered the burden of West Indies batting and demonstrated resilience in Test conditions. Yet, rather than providing them with stability and confidence, CWI has often cast them aside, undermining careers and destabilizing the team. At the same time, players who have repeatedly failed at the Test level continue to be recalled, sending the unmistakable message that selection is not about performance but about preference.

Equally damaging is CWI’s arbitrary enforcement of eligibility rules. In the past, regional first-class cricket was the cornerstone of West Indies Test selection. Players had to prove themselves in the longer format before earning the right to represent the Caribbean at the highest level. This created a pipeline of hardened, disciplined cricketers ready for international challenges. Today, that principle has been abandoned. Certain players are fast-tracked into the Test team without demonstrating consistency in the regional competition, while others who dominate first-class cricket are ignored. This inconsistent application of rules not only devalues the regional tournament but also destroys the morale of hardworking cricketers who see no reward for their efforts.

The net effect of these policies is the creation of a culture of instability and favoritism. CWI has fostered an environment where players feel expendable, where selection is unpredictable, and where accountability for poor results is always shifted away from the administrators and onto the players themselves. This culture is not only toxic but also unsustainable. No team can perform with consistency when its governing body operates with opacity, bias, and indifference.

Beyond selection and coaching, CWI has also failed to provide adequate player support structures. Conflicts between the board and senior cricketers over contracts, payment, and respect have been a recurring theme for more than two decades. Instead of treating players as partners in building a stronger cricketing future, the board has too often treated them as adversaries. This adversarial relationship has driven some of the region’s finest talents away from Test cricket and into T20 leagues around the world, depriving the West Indies of stability and leadership.

What has been destroyed is not merely a cricket team but a legacy. West Indies cricket once stood for pride, resilience, and regional unity. It produced heroes who inspired generations across the Caribbean and beyond. Today, that legacy is tarnished by short-sighted decision-making, lack of vision, and the petty politics of those charged with safeguarding it. Instead of laying a foundation for resurgence, CWI’s leadership continues to dig the hole deeper.

The tragedy of West Indies cricket is therefore not a shortage of talent but a surplus of mismanagement. Until CWI itself is fundamentally reformed—until incompetence, nepotism, and unaccountability are rooted out—the West Indies will remain trapped in decline. Revival will require leaders who understand that cricket is bigger than themselves, leaders willing to prioritize merit, transparency, and player development. Only then can the Caribbean dream of restoring its place at the summit of world cricket.
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 6:54 AM
@FanAttick

Well said....
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 9:36 AM
In the past, regional first-class cricket was the cornerstone of West Indies Test selection. Players had to prove themselves in the longer format before earning the right to represent the Caribbean at the highest level. This created a pipeline of hardened, disciplined cricketers ready for international challenges.


This has not been true for more than 30 years.....
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 9:55 AM
@newdread…

This has not been true for more than 30 years.....


Fair enough..but this problem has been exacerbated by the current CWI administration…
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 10:20 AM
West Indies performance varies from opposition to oppsition somewhat


In the last 10 years

West Indies batting average

vs Zimbabwe 38.00 average (which is very poor given the opposition)
vs Afghanistan 27.00 ( 1 test)
vs England 25.28
vs Bangladesh 25.28
vs Srilanka 24.33
vs Pakistan 22.23
vs NZ 21.09
vs Australia 19.59
vs India 19.06
vs SA 17.07


West Indies top 6 batsmen averagae during the same period

vs Zimbabwe 46.36
vs Afghanistan 33.14
vs Bangladesh 31.44
vs England 28.92
vs Srilanka 27.39
vs Pakistan 24.21
vs NZ 23.12
vs Australia 20.52
vs India 20.18
vs SA 19.18


Windies batting is abysmal against 3 nations mostly. Australia, India, SA.
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 10:38 AM
very good article very balanced and on point
The adversarial nature of the board with regard to players has been a festering sore
that coupled with nepotism has led us to where we are today
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 10:48 AM
@FanAttick

I submitted this one-page document to PM Rowley and all sports ministers in CARICOM in 2021.
No one responded.
Could it be that confusions arise because they are like posters on this site who can only read one sentence on a thread?

Sarge.


COVER BRIEFING SHEET
Subject: Governance and Accountability in Cricket West Indies (CWI)
Prepared for: Ministers Responsible for Sport and Human Resource Development, CARICOM


. Issue

Cricket West Indies (CWI), though privately incorporated, exercises authority over a major regional public good: the administration of West Indies cricket. Persistent concerns regarding governance, transparency, and merit-based accountability have eroded stakeholder confidence. Despite repeated reviews and recommendations by CARICOM, structural reform has stalled.

The key governance tension remains: how to balance institutional autonomy with regional accountability in a manner that protects CWI’s independence while ensuring transparency and fair governance.

Background

CWI is registered as a private entity under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, comprising six territorial boards.
Its legal autonomy shields it from political interference but has also limited external oversight.
CARICOM-commissioned reports (2001, 2015) identified outdated governance practices and recommended sweeping reforms—including board restructuring and independent oversight. ³
CWI formally rejected direct intervention, citing its independence as essential to preserving the integrity of the sport.
The persistence of internal patronage systems and stagnant reform continues to undermine the region’s unified cricket development agenda.

Current Situation

CWI’s governance and financial transparency remain largely internally managed.
Territorial boards operate with uneven standards of administration and accountability.
Public perception of nepotism and insularity has weakened trust in the organization.
Fragmented youth and training systems undercut CARICOM’s wider human resource development goals.

Key Considerations for CARICOM Ministers

Political Sensitivity: Any reform must respect CWI’s autonomy while instituting transparent oversight.
Economic Impact: Poor governance may deter sponsorship and investment critical to sports tourism and creative industries.
Regional Development Alignment: CWI’s autonomy limits coordination with regional youth empowerment and sport-education initiatives.
Reputational Risk: Sustained governance controversy affects both the image of Caribbean cricket and CARICOM’s credibility in advancing reform.

Recommended Next Steps
Establish an Independent Regional Oversight Board (IROB):
Jointly constituted by CARICOM and CWI to monitor governance and publish annual accountability reports.

Initiate a CARICOM–CWI Liaison Mechanism:
A permanent joint committee to coordinate youth, training, and facility development programs regionally.

Adopt a Regional Sports Governance Accord:
Endorsed at the CARICOM Heads of Government level, establishing principles for good governance applicable to all regional sporting bodies.

Mandate Transparent Public Reporting:
Require CWI to produce annual governance and financial reports accessible to national stakeholders and the public.

Implement Governance Training Programs:
Introduce certification for board and administrative members based on international sport governance standards.

Summary
CWI operates independently, but not in isolation from the region’s collective identity and developmental goals. Strengthening governance, therefore, is a shared responsibility.
The recommended framework seeks to preserve CWI’s autonomy while embedding accountability within a cooperative CARICOM-led governance ecosystem.

Supporting Documents
Annex A: Policy Brief – Cricket West Indies and the Governance Challenge
Annex B: Excerpts from the CARICOM Governance Review (Patterson, Barriteau & Wilkin, 2015)
Annex C: Communiqué of the Thirty-Seventh CARICOM Heads of Government Meeting (2016)

Sarge
Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 11:15 AM

@FanAttick


Is this original? It's really good. We could put it on the front page if you wanted.

Sun, Oct 5, '25 at 11:20 AM

@ponderiver

What is balance about an article, with only figures, without analysis. It is only posted, to support the nefarious narrative of the poster.

during those periods, cricketers were in the mindset of take, take,take from CWI, and did not make themselves available to play, for the team, and support, the board, which fostered their cricketing development, andskills .