It's theifing
Forums >
The Rum Shop >
What is this, they have no reviews
What is this, they have no reviews
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:20 PM
debut: Nov 26, '06
62,790 runs
@methodic
men beg him...and he caved in...
good thing I have a MUTE BUTTON as I dont want to hear these comms begging all the more
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:20 PM
@methodic
I was saying the same thing. Wonder what would have happened if they had given it after he already gave not out.
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:21 PM
debut: Nov 26, '06
62,790 runs
At least...Alex Worf..(sic) is 10 from 10.
and bless muh ears the Comm admits that NZ wasted their reviews and still now getting another.
piss in muh pocket
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:21 PM
@methodic
Precisely…why de so-in-so he went for a review with their reviews gone
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:22 PM
debut: Feb 8, '04
24,177 runs
Did the female commie said excellent umpiring? WTH! Bullshit!!
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:23 PM
Dont blame the players any player should try and gain an advantage
That was weak from the umpires
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:28 PM
What that umpire did was totally wrong. His decision was not out, NZ had no reviews remaining so he should never have allowed that review no matter how much they pleaded with him.
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:33 PM
debut: Apr 27, '03
61,931 runs
@googley
The decision of not out. Umpire Was so sure he wanted to prove it to them raas.
Fri, Dec 5, '25 at 9:45 PM
@conman
Very weak indeed. Sometimes these umpires bend the rules of the game. NZ used up all their reviews so the moment he said not out, that should have been the end of that appeal, he should never have allowed NZ to sway him to go up stairs. I have never seen such in test cricket before.