@Dukes
Tevin Imlach was selected to play the 2 test matches in Pakistan for the obvious reason that he is a better wicketkeeper than DaSilva ESPECIALLY up at the wicket to spinners PARTICULARLY when the ball is TURNING SQUARE and your SPINNERS would be bowling the majority of the overs.
What is so difficult to understand???
The only West Indian wicketkeeper to average more than 30 with the bat in the last 40 years was Dujon and he averaged 31.They all averaged between 18 and 25 with Jacobs averaging 28.
The current WI top 6 all average under 30 except Greaves due to his unbeaten 202.Incidentally Greaves has 3 scores in test cricket above 50 and all three are unbeaten.
Hodge comes in for Athanze and the former averages24.63 and the latter 23.68 while DaSilva averages 24.76.
If a WI selector is looking at the batting to determine who his wicketkeeper will be then he is a JACKASS because none of them will ever make enough runs to make up for dropping catches.
Maybe a better angle for your argument would be to compare the test batting average of WI wicketkeepers post Dujon, to the test batting averages of wicketkeepers from Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, and Ireland.
Those are the test playing nations that are closest to West Indies in performance and ranking.
The reality is in the modern test game, a specialist keeper who doesn’t contribute with the bat has gone the way of the dodo bird.
BTW….we have different recollections regarding why Imlach replaced DaSilva in Pakistan.
As I recall, DaSilva was dropped because he wasn’t making enough runs. Not because of a deficiency in his wicketkeeping.
We all clearly saw after Imlach’s performances in Pakistan that he was the superior keeper to DaSilva by some distance.
By the same token, it could be argued that DaSilva is much the superior batsman since TO DATE, Imlach averages about half of DaSilva’s test batting average