1  159 runs v aust

2  133 runs v aust 

3  176 runs v aust

4  inns & 140 runs v india

5  7 wickets v india

6  draw v n.z

7  9 wickets v n.z 

8  323 runs v n.z

@nat

Some say they see improvements. You see any?

@natty_forever

no

Nat the negative will always focus on the negative.

3 of the last 7 innings:

457/6

390

420.

5 Centuries including a double.

Had Hope not taken ill and batted at 4 we would have drawn this match!

@voiceofreason

In two matches those scores you are highlighting were with NZ two bowlers short.

Had Hope not taken ill and batted at 4 we would have drawn this match!

Had this, had that! If your granny had balls she'd be your grandpa!

Dem say "Trust the Process"

@Trex

Stop focusing on the negatives.

Just.....Count the centuries...Bro....

Don't count the wickets....taken by our bowlers...

Don't count the losses...

Just Trust The Process....

Earlier... victory and losses were the one and only criteria..

Now... with only 4 points from 8 matches...@ 9th...in Test Championship...Last cycle 8th..

COUNT CENTURIES...

Not to forget..we also 9th in ODI... with only one point seperate Bangladesh...

@voiceofreason

5 centuries?

@JoeGrine

In two matches those scores you are highlighting were with NZ two bowlers short.

You accusing me of saying had Hope been fit and then stating this????

@nissan

4 centuries and a double.

@natty_forever

The Negatives are too obvious. 27 was just the tip of the iceberg.

Sammy's regime as the Don of West Cricket is sinking like the titanic.

@voiceofreason

You accusing me of saying had Hope been fit and then stating this????

My statement that NZ was down 2 bowlers is a FACT (something you are not so familiar with)

Saying "if" Hope was is a CONJECTURE.

There is a difference between a fact and a conjecture.