Puts their marginal win against WI in proper perspective. Then I reflect on the seedings for the WC and the make-up of each super 8 groups.

Jus sayin

WI 'weak ' bowling attack faired better than Adil Rashid, Jofra Archer and co.

Context is key

Three 250+ scores in this edition of the T20 WC and WI has one and the home team the other two. They are known for efficiently exploiting home conditions

Jus keepin it real

Wow this pitch plays like smooth hard concrete

@InHindsight

@InHindsight

ShhH.. The discourteous one will come and say we have the weakest bowling attack in the WC yet India struggled to make 197. Worse yet he will come to talk some crap about PP.

@voiceofreason

Why are you so stupid?

De Cappo Hope said we did not get enough in the PP. And you're still talking crap.

India won with 4 balls to spare. In the context of T20 this is good.

More importantly, everyone who knows the game and considers our weak bowling knew we were 20 runs short.

The 20 runs could easily have been gotten from the power play which we gave up.

Fundamentally, in today's T20, you cannot afford to give up the PP in T20.

It is an assinine strategy orchestrated by Daren Sammy.

@Courtesy

Let's now listen to the sound of silence.

@Brerzerk

I don't expect any deference from VOR, de perennial Sammy asslicker.

😀

Their arguments are contradictory.

The claim that WI had a weak bowling attack and that Sammy was poor as Coach.

Either the bowling wasn't as wears it was made out to be or Sammy was decent with planning and strategy with a weak attack.

I proffer that India, now in the final, will find areas they shpuld have executed better in this game..

I dismiss all the silly arguments

@InHindsight

You should stick to your handle, they lost by 7 runs after dropping Samson. I didn't subscribe to "weakest attack: mantra, just incase you want to lump me in there. I said dew dew dew...which was not a factor today.

@InHindsight

What were you saying again?