CaribbeanCricket.com

The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Forums > The Back Room > Dide he and others

Dide he and others

Sun, Jun 7, '26 at 1:44 PM

(from Malta and India) cheat?

I entered but knew I could not win

https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/books/news/commonwealth-short-story-winner-ai-generated-jamir-nazir-granta-b2980039.html

Sun, Jun 7, '26 at 2:29 PM

@trev114

what a planet dis these days!

Mon, Jun 8, '26 at 10:35 AM

.................

According to The Free Press, AI-detection platforms Pangram and Grammarly both identified The Serpent in the Grove as “100 percent” AI-generated, while GPTZero, another AI-detection tool for machine-written text, classified it as “entirely human” and QuillBot, a writing and paraphrasing platform that also offers AI-detection software, found a “zero percent likelihood” of its machine authorship.
A user on X pointed out that Pangram had flagged The Bastion’s Shadow by Maltese writer John Edward DeMicoli, winner for the Canada and Europe region, as fully AI-generated while Mehendi Nights by Indian writer Sharon Aruparayil, winner for Asia, was scanned as partly AI-generated.Aruparayil denied using AI “at any stage” in the writing, editing or development of Mehendi Nights and said she had submitted “Google Doc timestamps” and other material to the Commonwealth Foundation to demonstrate the story’s development process.“The story has had only human hands and eyes on it

Sigrid Rausing, who noted that the magazine had “no control over the selection of the Commonwealth Prize stories” and played no role in choosing the jury.She added that “more than one” Commonwealth prize-winning story had faced allegations of AI use.

Note: Individuals on this site have no idea how these AI programs are written.

A question phrased to an AI program: Pangram

Is your AI writing totally accurate?

AI reply: No, my writing is not always totally accurate. As an AI, I am a highly capable language model, but I do not truly "know" facts the way a human does. Instead, I predict the most logical next words based on patterns in the massive datasets I was trained on.

AI Hallucinations: I can sometimes generate information that sounds completely confident, professional, and convincing, but is actually factually incorrect or fabricated.

Knowledge Cutoffs: My internal training data has a specific time limit. While I can use live search tools to look up current events, my standalone knowledge cannot account for things that happened after my data was finalized.

Complex Reasoning Errors: While I am excellent at synthesizing information, I can still make mistakes with complex logic

Why This Disclaimer Exists

Because I am an AI, I do not understand facts the way humans do. I generate text by predicting the most likely words to follow one another based on patterns . Because of this setup, I can occasionally experience "hallucinations"—which means I might write something that sounds completely confident and polished, but is actually incorrect

So Pseudos' keep believing in AI..

We have been using Forth(AI) a machine language for over 20 years to run Oil refineries , chemical plants etc.complex equations...using hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen , oxygen etc ; AI is the safest way to control the flow of such gases , online mass balances and MS/GC automatic sampling .