@StumpCam wrote:

I’m in agreement with Tantemerle assessment. There was nothing special about that delivery and Andrew should not have committed to the front foot without getting close to the pitch of the delivery.

If you know anything about playing spin you should know that. Conversely, you have to let the ball come to you or play on the back foot.

However, anybody can get out first ball.

The bigger issue, however, does Andrew who is relatively young and inexperienced have the ability and competency at this level?

The youth will be fine. He is better off opening the innings at this stage but Rutherford had a last minute absence and he had to bat in the middle.

@Courtesy wrote:

Bruh, your posts are just accretions of absurdities and insularity to the point now where they sound ridiculous.

You, like quite a few others here have lost all credibility because of your blatant insularity..

Tante was on point in his assesssment...the lack of basic cricket skills made the delivery what you think it was.

........................

Btw, you have not commented on KEACY CARTY. I wonder why?

I already agreed Keacy killed the game at 3. That's obvious. However after 54 innings and still averaging 41, just like your boy Hope he needs time to work on his s/r.