This is ridiculous! His bat hit his pad not the ball!

@voiceofreason wrote:

This is ridiculous! That ball hit his pad not the ball!

The ball did not hit the pad

the bat hit the pad

@FanAttick wrote:

The ball did not hit the pad

the bat hit the pad

Corrected. His bat hit his pad as the ball passed. Gap between ball and bat.

@voiceofreason wrote:

Corrected. His bat hit his pad as the ball passed. Gap between ball and bat.

If Virat Kohli were batting you think the TV Umpire would have seen that obvious gap?😂

That was one of the quickest decisions.. the TV umpire like he couldn't wait to put the batman out.

Neutral umpires are not a thing anymore?

Any umpire in the world would have given that out. That is the instruction if there is a spike when the ball is next to bat. Their job is not to assume things .

@jnaveen wrote:

Any umpire in the world would have given that out. That is the instruction if there is a spike when the ball is next to bat. Their job is not to assume things .

Correck... the Third umpire must have compelling reasons to overturn the decsion of the onfield umpire.

@anthonyp wrote:

That was one of the quickest decisions.. the TV umpire like he couldn't wait to put the batman out.

Neutral umpires are not a thing anymore?

Technology was introduced to assist in getting decisions right. This was not a good use of technology offered to the TV Umpire. Let's be blunt, the TV Umpire messed up, big time.

@Courtesy wrote:

Correck... the Third umpire must have compelling reasons to overturn the decsion of the onfield umpire.

Isn't an obvious gap between bat and ball when the spike came not compelling.

Are you even watching the game of following on misinfo?

The other rule. ... you have to walk when the umpire finger goes up. In this case his finger went up twice.

There can be a case for dissent

Disclaimer: I also do not agree with the decision ...

@FanAttick wrote:

If Virat Kohli were batting you think the TV Umpire would have seen that obvious gap?😂

That Gap would have been wider than the river nile. Probably would have pulled his magnifying glass!

@jnaveen wrote:

Any umpire in the world would have given that out. That is the instruction if there is a spike when the ball is next to bat. Their job is not to assume things

So then get rid of the dam technology then. The test should be eye and spike. If the bat hit the pad at the same time as the ball passed even with a wider gap should we trust the spike too? Spike can be caused by various noises and clearly in this case there is one connection that caused that spike.

@jnaveen wrote:

Any umpire in the world would have given that out. That is the instruction if there is a spike when the ball is next to bat. Their job is not to assume things .

And the is nonsensical because we've seen snicko spike when ball is far from bat, clothing or anything for that matter. If it's obvious to the eye then snickno should be overruled

@voiceofreason wrote:

This is ridiculous! His bat hit his pad not the ball!

agree

@InHindsight wrote:

And the is nonsensical because we've seen snicko spike when ball is far from bat, clothing or anything for that matter. If it's obvious to the eye then snickno should be overruled

@voiceofreason wrote:

That Gap would have been wider than the river nile. Probably would have pulled his magnifying glass!

Tsk Tsk.....you two some are dissing India by say Tief....

Even after India selectas used dem second string team bowlers to play in the rubber.

And knew batting second would lose the game....

They even won the toss and batted.

Geeezee 😂

You gats dem Indians really pissed so watch out in dem T20"s...