West Indies players are again in the dark about the details of a sponsorship contract extension bet

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com Digi owns all players intellectual property rights for the next

In reply to FanAttick Cockroach ever like light?

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com "The MOU which both parties have signed make it quite cle

In reply to hewesleyb When will the WICB stop playing these games? :evil:

If it is correct that the WIPA was not a party to this decision , it aint no problem , all WIPA ha

In reply to POINT What will happen now is certain jornalist/s will now jump on the bandwagon...su

Fork Dinas...if he get foreknowledge he then proceed to fork everything for the sponsors. Dinas on

In reply to POINT I like that idea of the regional governments removing the WICB from any authori

In reply to hewesleyb "The MOU which both parties have signed make it quite clear under A

In reply to garyg What about Digicel's relationships with certain directors? Isn't there a clea

In reply to FanAttick Not funny :shock:

In reply to garyg Giving C&WIPA a say who the sponsor is will present a conflict of interest.

In reply to dcbreds No man. That is a ok!!!! No conflict there. :wink:

In reply to dcbreds Relationship with which director. Was there complaint that Braffie and Teddy

In reply to BerksOwl The WICB has never ever given its own team the necessary Support Staff , t

In reply to garyg I know you have heard this before but just one last reminder; DIGICEL is the wor

In reply to hewesleyb :shock: :shock: Oh oh. yuh gone and done it now, oh goshhhhh :D :D :lol:

(tsk tsk) I tired...I gine and Take a rest. steeeupse. 6-0...and only body that losing is US and th

In reply to garyg I know you are not that naive or ignorant about all the facts surrounding that

In reply to dcbreds Are you naive and ignorant of the facts surrounding the previous C&W dea

In reply to hewesleyb DIGICEL is the worse thing, Well maybe Sir Digi is the worst thing t

In reply to garyg Garyg, WIPA does not want to choose who the sponsor is, they simply one to ens

In reply to kup Listen, Garyg live in his own fairy tale world so please don't burst his bubble

In reply to garyg Sometimes you come accross as someone with well below average intelligence.

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com No surprise here.

What does the MOU state. Does it state that the WICB cannot excercise their sponsorship option wit

In reply to carl0002 Maybe so..................................but why then would WICB sign an M

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy This is the WICB eh. As far as i can see WICB will sign anything without

In reply to carl0002 You are affording the WICB too much credit for what is obviously another br

Look, dinas shove that mou down the wicb...demanding that they sign it...remember. The sponsor clau

In reply to ends U ent mekking sense. Why would WICB allow WIPA to bully them into signing MOU?

4 million for an extension until 2012 is a paltry sum.... KG deserves a stick lash!!!!

In reply to ends I with the board on this one When were you ever against the board when it co

In reply to Fortis In the context of the MOU what does consultation mean. Inform? What informati

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy "Why would WICB allow WIPA to bully them into signing MOU? Where

In reply to Zikdaman When did you ever not ask a question?

In reply to Larr Pullo 4 million for an extension until 2012 is a paltry sum.... Makes you wo

In reply to Larr Pullo Is that 4 million a year or 4 million for the entire period. If its 4 mil

In reply to ends Ok then...yu really tink yuh rass was going to get way wid dat attempt at sligh

In reply to carl0002 Well the current deal supposed to expire in 2010, and the extension runs up

In reply to Larr Pullo He took revenge on Gayle by screwing both the WICB and all the players. :l

In reply to carl0002 The other option is he getting something under the table. You just now c

In reply to Zikdaman Evertime KG do something silly is it cuz he getting paid under the table. I

In reply to carl0002 WIPA's role would be to ensure players' rights are not infringed, and that

In reply to ends Ends, you miss the important point, which is the players' rights. All that WIPA

In reply to kup Your arguement would be more valid if they had signed with a new sponsor. In mos

The sponsor cannot infringe the players rights. The player contracts are separate and apart from th

In reply to ends :roll: _ryan

In reply to ends The player contracts are separate and apart from the sponsor contract. Are y

At that pt wipa are free to say fork off....

In reply to carl0002 So what stops the existing sponsor, in their new extension contract, for as

In reply to kup So why were KG & Deyal looking for an escape clause? They had had built a ca

In reply to kup The sponsor can ask for the heavens. It boils down to what the WICB can deliver