Message Board Archives

HEADLINE: WICB holding firm on fees

 
CaribbeanCricket.com Feb 23, 2017, 2:11:05 AM 

The West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) is holding firm on its policy of charging a ‘release fee’ in order to provide a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) to Caribbean players participating in overseas Twenty20 tournaments.
WICB president Dave Cameron, speaking at a Town Hall meeting at Preysal Secondary in Couva last week, said the regional board is sticking to that policy going forward.
Last year the Board of Directors of WICB, took a policy decision on the issuance of NOCs, which was communicated to all ICC Full Members’ CEOs and presidents.
“The WICB will levy a charge for the granting of an NOC for West Indian cricketers seeking a release to participate in Leagues outside the jurisdiction of the West Indies. This will be an amount equivalent to 20 per cent of the player fee (as defined in the player contract) that is actually paid to the relevant player. All NOCs will be subject to West Indies international commitments and, in respect of centrally contracted players, official domestic cricket matches in the West Indies,” a WICB press release state last year.
The release fees came up as Cameron spoke about the finances of the Board and what the WICB is expected to get from ICC events over the next eight years.
Cameron said the ICC is expected to generate around US$2.7 billion in cash revenues. He said expenses are expected to around US$900 million over that eight years and of the surplus it is expected that India will get about 16 per cent, England eight per cent and the other countries get about seven per cent which is about US$127 million over an eight-year period but he insisted that it is not cast in stone as yet.

read the full article at Trinidad Express


Full Story

 
POINT Feb 23, 2017, 4:49:59 AM 

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com

TAKE THE BUMS TO COURT I SAY, LET THE

COURT DECIDE . IF IT IS ONLY THE

WICBC ENGAGING IN THIS ACTIVITY THEN

MORE THAN LIKELY THE WICBC WOULD

COME OUT THE LOSER .

 
positiveg Feb 23, 2017, 4:57:55 AM 

In reply to POINT

I really find 20% to be extremely high. Dem man is some real Pimps you know. Slapping the players with powder on their hands.

 
Khaga Feb 23, 2017, 4:59:41 AM 

Keep them checks coming..cash em.. lol

 
camos Feb 23, 2017, 5:09:21 AM 

WICB can't prevail in court on this, why would a player need to pay the WICB more for not playing for 6 weeks than the WI would pay that player for playing for those 6 weeks?

 
FuzzyWuzzy Feb 23, 2017, 5:20:42 AM 

In reply to camos

What wicb pay and what a league plays a player are not relevant. What is relevant is if other leagues view 20% excessive if other boards stay at 10%. Indeed it shouldn't even bother the leagues unless they are required to up player fees to make up the players loss to wicb.

 
camos Feb 23, 2017, 5:31:53 AM 

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

What wicb pay and what a league plays a player are not relevant



says who? what is that 20% based on? If the leagues are paying it may not be important but if the player is the one paying there will be lots of problems!

 
XDFIX Feb 23, 2017, 5:34:03 AM 

The players are not paying one red cent - it's the league paying!

 
camos Feb 23, 2017, 5:37:41 AM 

In reply to XDFIX

the leagues can drop the NOC REQUIREMENT.