Read dis nah
Link Text
Message Board Archives
ALL YOU BRITISH SUBJECTS MOURING YOUR QUEEN
2022-09-23 11:38:47
2022-09-23 12:17:14
In reply to Emir
Good read
2022-09-23 13:18:44
In reply to Emir
Did you pen that piece?
Good stuff.
2022-09-23 14:03:45
Moured by his King 
2022-09-23 14:12:00
Wait. People still talking, and thinking, about that woman?
2022-09-23 14:12:44
One sided. The writer wishes to examine the moral terpitude of his subject by claiming he took money from a foreign entity....without ever stating why that was morally corrupt or otherwise. Simply that it is one of Saudi background.
While the writer makes no mention of his own biasses.
2022-09-23 14:15:44
In reply to Ayenmol
Dude. It's an opinion piece.
It's kinda given that there will be biases in opinion pieces. That's why they are called opinion pieces.
2022-09-23 14:23:23
In reply to SnoopDog
I have seen lots of opinion pieces where the writer allows the reader to peer into the reasons they hold their opinion.
But i rather not get too deep into that.
Just because it is an opinion piece does not exclude the writer from being forthcoming with relevant information.
Taking down someone on moral grounds while not stipulating the readon you judge them on such grounds is just a hatchet job.
Aimed at sullying others only.
King Solomon accepted gifts from all and sundry. A monarch is not a Politician...unless am ignorant to British law.
Monarchs are known to be given and receive gifts. Lavish ones at that from all who so choose.
2022-09-23 15:09:14
In reply to Ayenmol
So in other words, you disagree with the writer's opinion in the writer's opinion piece.
Good. Now move on.
2022-09-23 15:14:02
In reply to SnoopDog
The writer hides his agenda in his opinion that relies heavily on the agenda of another.
2022-09-23 15:38:22
In reply to Ayenmol
If VOR is the heavy weigh champion of Goat-mouthedness, then you my man are the heavy weight champion of banality and pidantics.
As the late Royal Freeloader would say: "Cheerio o ole chap".
2022-09-23 15:43:11
In reply to SnoopDog
Says the man who is arguing that a mans opinion is sacred while attacking another man's opinion....am the banal one?
2022-09-23 15:43:46
One is entitled to feel saddened at the death of Queen Elizabeth II and even admire her perseverance in running her empire. However, we should not forget that the wealth Britain gained came from the sweat and toil of those who laboured in the colonies and those of us who were deluded by the grandeur of her empire.
agree with those sentiments...
2022-09-23 15:50:02
In reply to googley
I'm going to get him to knock on your door with the good news. 
2022-09-23 15:52:39
In reply to SnoopDog
You are so primed for a banal fight you are even getting your subjects wrong.
lawd.
2022-09-23 15:57:40
In reply to Ayenmol
I recommend you knock on poster googley's door between the hours of 7pm to 11pm tomorrow night. I'm reliably advised he will be home and has no plans during that block of time.
2022-09-23 16:04:30
In reply to SnoopDog
It's too bad you do not have a mirror in your house.
2022-09-23 17:50:41
"painful loss for those who loved her"
2022-09-23 18:44:40
I have never been an avid reader of anything more than the odd Tabloid,but itend to read these bits by some of our Members,I enjoyed this and learnt a bit.I will continue to read topics from the intelligent ones.Go on Ayenmol and SnoopDog I was just starting to enjoy this battle. 
2022-09-23 20:27:35
The JW in their own magazines have stated the Europeans used Christianity to make commerce through enslavement of African slaves. Hence the Christianity employed by the Europeans back then was false religion.
False Religion is referred to (in the bible) as Babylon System...The Pope and the Queen would be seen as heads and symbols of Babylon system.
One can therefore see the JW position on these things.
2022-09-24 00:32:37
In reply to analyst-kid
True on all counts. However, Babylon the Great is not a single person...and one individual passing does not constitute Babylon falling. It will fall by the hand of the one who is to destroy it.
Therefore we do not celebrate the passing of an individual nor do we seek to judge that individual.
Furthermore, none of the opinions rendered here are an attempt to uphold God's Sovereignty. Is it? It is simply one side of the coin blaming the other side for it's existence and issues.
Or seeking to elevate one ideology over the other.
2022-09-24 04:18:46
I enjoy this kind of writing simple prose yet profound.
By the way, how does a man writing only his complete bias and no objectivity has 'Mixed Feelings and Nostalgia'on hearing both anthems played? Whether we CAN read or KNOW HOW TO READ are different things.
2022-09-24 12:52:06
Ahh yes
The ‘emancipate allyuhselves crew” telling the great unwashed what to think and what to not think
Oh the irony
2022-09-24 13:38:01
I hate seeing any discussion about European conquest and slavery without Arab exploits!
2022-09-24 14:47:32
In reply to XDFIX
Gengis Khan, Alexander, and Caesar Augustus too bro!
2022-09-25 00:42:31
In reply to Halliwell
Do you realize that Canada and Jamaica are the King’s property but TTO is a republic?
2022-09-25 00:44:26
Some people talk about reparations but love the title Sir - they get it by dealing before the Queen
2022-09-25 00:52:51
In reply to Barry
A Nigerian DJ who was recognised in one of the Queen’s Honours ceremonies said that all his life the people were telling him he didn’t belong and that they represented the establishment and they could guarantee that he wasn’t appreciated until….. he was recognised, then why would he then refuse to accept it and prove all the haters right that he should be excluded. He took it to stick it to the haters and to know to himself that his contribution was on par or better with anything else offered