Message Board Archives
USD $100: Ownership strangle
pelon
2016-04-11 21:18:34
Article states that Vijay Mallya "bought" the Barbados Tridents for $100.00 USD
LINK - April 11th
By buying the team, me and the other shareholders assumed the obligation to participate in the tournament. Now participation in CPL costs money. So I went to the Barbados government saying I need your support. I met the Prime Minister and the government agreed to support but I paid USD 100 only to buy the team.
Running the team will cost about USD 2 million but the Barbados government is granting subsidies to the franchise. People don't get it and jump to conclusions without knowing the facts. There is a cost of participation such as players salaries and franchise fee. So I worked out all the numbers, studied the model and went to government asking for help. They were keen to help me
Good people, this goes two ways:
1. Mallya commits to the development of the team and leverages the governments support to ensure growth in a mutually beneficial way.
2 (coughing). Mallya leverages his ownership to his advantage alone, and sells the team -at a spectacular markup- after threatening to withhold the team next season due to "lack of adequate support"
Did the CPL give locals/regional interest the option to buy for $100???? Was the "promise of investment" from Mallya enough??? Ok, that is all folks, back to my cold Guinness.
nick2020
2016-04-11 21:24:20
In reply to pelon
Can you give me $100?
I would like to own the Tridents.
positiveg
2016-04-11 21:26:50
In reply to pelon
Wow very very interesting.
positiveg
2016-04-11 21:27:28
In reply to nick2020
Would need to add $1 to that, that's $1 USD or $2 Bajan
cricketest
2016-04-11 21:50:34
dats like signing a contract for 20 years, 1 million USD.
Khaga
2016-04-11 22:37:50
Bleed them,Mallya! They withstood Stanford..you are a small fry..
FuzzyWuzzy
2016-04-12 08:04:25
In reply to Khaga
Easy Surya
sudden
2016-04-12 08:44:17
In reply to pelon
according to how they are structured companies can worth $200 but control assets in the millions.
Khaga
2016-04-12 08:57:45
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
Follow Mallya news in India..
matchstick
2016-04-12 09:01:50
In reply to Khaga
Bleed them,Mallya! They withstood Stanford..you are a small fry..
it must be that the franchise had some debt that he absorbed in the purchase and that was good enough for CPL. The 100 was just a formality.
Kay
2016-04-12 09:15:59
Since this is a commercial business arrangement there must be valuable consideration or else the agreement could be deemed "nudum pactum".
Consideration fees in these type of agreements are mostly nominal.... nothing wrong with that
Khaga
2016-04-12 09:39:05
In reply to matchstick
I am going to observe how all this will go down..
pelon
2016-04-12 10:04:10
The flag raised is not about how common it is, or whether it has precedent. Did others (esp. in the region) have an opportunity to bid on the team?
This is where the local apologist/intellectual wizards come in and say it's a "commercial business arrangement" or "structured companies can be worth $200 but control assets in the millions". All true peoples, all true, but yuh missing the boat. Stay tuned, it wont be long.
camos
2016-04-12 10:11:18
In reply to pelon
sometimes you do that as a government, but you have strict guidelines/assurances as to the annual expenditure by the benefiting company.
sudden
2016-04-12 10:47:36
In reply to pelon
remember the team was on the market for a while? remember the talk about govt not doing enough to help so the team may need to leave Bim?
VIX
2016-04-12 10:55:53
Great! another corrupt Indian to bleed $$ from!!!
Debt ridden Tridents made a great deal! Millions in debt paid off by the Indian, who will now be liable for all further losses. Great move by the Bim govt!!
bleed dem Indians dryyyy
pelon
2016-04-12 11:22:03
In reply to sudden
Prediction: He "holds". No investment. No Capital injections. Just HOLDS the card. After all he owned it for $100.00
I would love to be wrong here.
Khaga
2016-04-12 19:00:21
In reply to pelon
It'd be interesting to know if the Barbados government issued passports to Mallya. Mallya got into CPL a couple of months before his troubles with the banks became public in India and he left India. He has since resigned his position as Chairman of RCB.
sudden
2016-04-12 19:03:30
In reply to pelon
Who pays the players?
Narper
2016-04-12 20:37:38
In reply to sudden
Old news
pelon
2016-04-12 22:10:47
In reply to sudden
Let's just say: "watch de ride".
nick2020
2016-04-12 22:47:02
In reply to pelon
Let us not say that.
Verstehen
2016-04-13 04:46:10
In reply to matchstick
it must be that the franchise had some debt that he absorbed in the purchase and that was good enough for CPL. The 100 was just a formality.
Precisely- the liabilities must have been significant. In fact buying a debt ridden company for a nominal amount (say $1) is not uncommon.
Buyer takes on debt.
For example:
How to buy a $100 million Formula One racing team for just one pound
pelon
2016-04-13 09:17:57
Many of you are missing the point: Vijay Mallya is riddled with debt and legal battles. You need to be cash flush (which he no longer is) to buy on paper ($1, $100 etc) and then INJECT capital. Who is going to partner with the embattled debt ridden "king of goodtimes" when CPL is not even remotely profitable????
Just today a story surfaces about his passport could be taken away.
sudden
2016-04-13 09:56:28
In reply to pelon
seems to me your issue is more with the owner than how the deal is structured
SPK
2016-04-13 10:39:11
In reply to Verstehen
Precisely- the liabilities must have been significant. In fact buying a debt ridden company for a nominal amount (say $1) is not uncommon.
Buyer takes on debt.
For example:
Or for a more recent example, closer to home:
Mittal offers T&T-based assets for sale for $1 to Government
Commie
2016-04-15 09:05:19
Again. When good ole Hunte and Hilaire insulated the WICB from the CPL and decided to extract a license fee, many were up in arms.
Its all smoke and mirrors folks.
pelon
2016-04-18 13:11:22
In reply to sudden
seems to me your issue is more with the owner than how the deal is structured
No, nothing so banal. While apologist and sheep called this transaction "standard" - I came here first to say the
due diligence was flawed. As the events unfold, "watch de ride" - it will get worst. Then you too will see it has noting to do with the individual,
but the process in which the power holders of our cricket prostrate themselves repeatedly.
The structure of the deal is worthless.
UPDATE: Indian court issues arrest warrant for primary stakeholder in the team.
POINT
2016-04-23 16:42:48
Devious People will always align themselves with Shady People . This is
generally known as :
" BIRDS OF A FEATHER WILL
ALWAYS FLOCK TOGETHER "
It is generally acknowledged that when
you are in a Hole , you should stop
digging . Because at some point You
would be unable to get out of that
Hole .
Commie
2016-04-24 05:11:50
In reply to pelon
At least ppl will listen a bit more now
Chrissy
2016-04-24 06:55:48
Several flags are raised here because di owner is in big trouble at home for suspect financial dealings.
But so we love it.