But why is CWI resisting restructuring?

Pages: previous  1  2  3  next 
link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/14/19 11:14:08 AM 
In reply to imusic

No. They oversaw the implementation of many aspects of the Patterson Report with the exception of four or five crucial recommendations which dealt with, in the main, restructuring.

In fact, this is the reason why Julian Hunte wanted another term after he had indicated he was not going to contest the Presidency. He was not satisfied that if he left, the Patterson Report would have been implemented in full. The implementation of the report was ongoing. With the benefit of hindsight Julian Hunte was proven correct.

The reason: It was because some board members resisted the full implementation of the report and two directors who initially sided with him on the full implementation voted against him on the day.

Btw, many of the regional heads know this.

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 11:14:40 AM 
In reply to imusic


Quite simply you are misguided, or are you being facetious?

big grin

Thought you were one of those who was dissatisfied with Cameron? What's your preoccupation with Hunte and Hilaire?

link sudden Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: 35332
3/14/19 11:16:50 AM 
In reply to InHindsight

The whining does never stop.
Whining does never stop.
Whining does never stop.
Inside ah de mas.
Because De iron have me so bazodee

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 11:17:43 AM 
In reply to sudden



lol lol lol

link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/14/19 11:18:00 AM 
In reply to sudden
lol lol lol

No. Allison Hinds promoter.

link Cuter Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Posts: 12731
3/14/19 11:37:03 AM 
In reply to sudden

I see you having fun cool

link imusic Joined: Nov 13, 2002
Posts: 67859
3/14/19 11:44:56 AM 
avatar image
In reply to InHindsight

Courtesy responded with his take on proceedings. You guys purport to be “insiders” regarding the workings of the H&H administration

Instead of waffling, do similar

link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/14/19 11:47:37 AM 
In reply to imusic
Courtesy responded with his take on proceedings...

My take? Mate, whatever I post here can be taken to the bank. After proper and meaningful research on the matter, I can say without fear of contradiction..."It is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth."

Allyuh need to understand the current politics, protectionism and machinations.

It's about frustrating the will of the various reports on restructuring CWI taht are sitting on the shelves and which would ultimately devolve power.

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 12:20:45 PM 
In reply to imusic


Instead of waffling, do similar





How is that so?


Ummm what's is your position on the Cameron administration? Mine's clear.

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 12:23:13 PM 
In reply to Courtesy


Did you hear John Eugene's comments on "The Banter" this morning or the DBS midday news item on Holder???


Point well made. I wonder whose agenda the local president is pushing can you tell me?

link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/14/19 12:35:11 PM 
In reply to InHindsight

I didn't hear it but I will follow up. Tks.

link carl0002 Joined: Apr 16, 2003
Posts: 22354
3/14/19 12:59:21 PM 
In reply to Courtesy
Man you making some vague assertions and basic inaccuracies in that piece its not even funny. I know you will garner lots of support because none will question some of the quasi logic in your statement, as the general theme fits in with overall feeling on the MB these days. What is disappointing is to see otherwise sensible posters becoming really unhinged over this CWI stuff.

link natty_forever Joined: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 50037
3/14/19 1:02:52 PM 
Motive?

link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/14/19 1:11:25 PM 
In reply to carl0002

Rip it to shreds mate, rip it to shreds.

In the absence of any contrary arguments from you, I will say in very banal and ordinary terms, great rhetoric, no substance. Other than a debate where sensible arguments are put forward, I will treat your post above with scant courtesy.

Let the debate start with this question: what prevented the boards of Guyana, Barbados and Windwards from giving the challenger a hearing before the votes for the presidency are cast? Is this your idea of democracy and inclusivity?

link POINT Joined: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 25381
3/14/19 2:14:19 PM 
Hell for over 16 Freaking Years in this very Forum , I have been writing
that the main obstacle regarding
West Indies

MUST BE A TOTAL RESTRUCTURING

OF ALL CRICKET IN THE REGION .

My Critics in this Forum castigated

me, One even wrote in this Forum that
He and others agree with Me 99 %
regarding what I write , the funny thing is that HE & OTHERS still they Criticize what I write .

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 2:25:02 PM 
In reply to POINT
Point you just have to tone it down a bit but by and large many here agree with your arguments?


Take for example you are always shouting ie writing in all uppercase. wink

link Drapsey Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 21380
3/14/19 2:29:55 PM 

I think they should restructure around the one man, one vote notion. Meaning that every (participating sovereign) nation involved/partaking in West Indies cricket would be able to table a single vote in elections for the various offices within. Democracy, if you will.

The only issue would be with the ability (or inability) to the manage the voting process to ensure that all those little dot island nations don't pool themselves as a voting block to always elect officers from within said block.

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 2:33:01 PM 
In reply to carl0002


Carl please tell us what are the fuzzy issues?

wink

link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/14/19 3:20:45 PM 

link InHindsight Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 8455
3/14/19 4:54:48 PM 
In reply to Courtesy

Yep that's pretty much it lol lol lol


Well articulated.

I intimated similar sentiments on this thread as it relates to Charles's contribution versus Dr Shallow's to their respective associations.


Again I ask What's Charles's agenda???
/
What has St Lucia or Windwards cricket gained from his directorship?

link TheTrail Joined: Jun 8, 2008
Posts: 18348
3/14/19 5:16:41 PM 
In reply to POINT

Sixteen effing years you were preaching this, and nothing has changed, time for you to get in the ring and make a difference instead of sitting on the borrowed fence singing from the old testament.


Give powen his effing fence back; you're making a mockery with it. lol lol

link POINT Joined: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 25381
3/14/19 7:54:03 PM 
In reply to TheTrail

I am just a Regular Cricket Fan , who decided on returning to the Region in
2000 to assess how the Great Prowess West Indies Cricketers in the International Cricket Arena started
on a downward Trend .

On several occasions I have cited how
WE got to where WE are . Check all my
current posts & threads . The stark
freaking Fact is that WE are where WE Are due to the TOTAL INCOMPETENCE
of the Worst International Cricket
Board in the Commonwealth .

Years after the International Cricket Conspirators decided to change the International Tour Schedule , that eliminated matches
being played between the Test Matches , and then out of the Blue England decided to limit International Players from playing in England .

It finally dawned on the Jokers in the WICBC many years later that they needed to have a Regional Cricket League .

NOW HAD THE WICBC IN THE GLORY YEARS

OF WEST INDIES CRICKET FORMED A

REGIONAL CRICKET LEAGUE ; IT WOULD

HAVE HAD A LOT OF FINANCIAL

SPONSORS.

History informs us that they sat on
their Asses and did absolutely nothing , Until a few years ago ;
at a time when the Glory Days of West Indies Cricket had faded , and
Our Teams were not attractive to potential Financial Sponsors .

The gist of what I have stated here is the freaking fact that there were
2 warning signals that the people in the WICBC ignored .

The first was the change in the International Tour Schedule & the
second was England's decision to limit Overseas Players from playing
Cricket in England .

These were the Factors that slowly
but surely diminished the competitiveness of Our Players , years later it finally dawned on the
Dimwits in the WICBC that it needed
to have a Regional Cricket League .

The sad thing is that this was done
at a time when Our Players Greatness
was greatly diminished , and Financial Sponsors due to our Teams
Standing in the International Cricket is Poor .

link carl0002 Joined: Apr 16, 2003
Posts: 22354
3/15/19 10:26:37 AM 
In reply to Courtesy
Why don't you just come out and say what you have discovered our found out, cuz I know you got something in your bonnet itching you and instead of saying what exactly it is you r spuriously attempting to frame some intellectual argument around it.

I must admit you have never been the same since H&H

link Courtesy Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 24136
3/15/19 10:42:34 AM 
In reply to carl0002

I am awaiting eagerly a response to my last post. And similarly, InHindsight cannot wait any longer for a response to his post as well.

link natty_forever Joined: Apr 28, 2003
Posts: 50037
3/15/19 11:05:14 AM 
In reply to carl0002 maybe one of the H.

Very Happy Smile Sad Surprised Shocked Confused Cool Laughing Razz Embarassed Crying or Very sad Evil or Very Mad Twisted Evil Rolling Eyes Wink
 
Pages: previous  1  2  3  next