delivery by isharma! He was on his toes, beyond the popping crease as the ball left his hand & his heel was nowhere in contact with the ground. What say you fellas!?
Message Board Archives
That wasn't a legal...
2019-08-23 21:30:43
2019-08-23 21:33:38
In reply to BeatDball
Huh ?
2019-08-23 21:36:30
In reply to LBW375 Read again wha mih seh.
2019-08-23 21:36:49
In reply to BeatDball
As long as something is behind the line..
2019-08-23 21:39:02
In reply to BeatDball
The law says whether raised or planted is legal if any part of the foot would have been behind the line.
Many spinners do not ground their entire foot when bowling
2019-08-23 21:41:04
In reply to maj His heel wasn't in contact with the ground as the ball left his hand! The front part of his feet was past the popping line! I'm facting sure of it, maj.
2019-08-23 21:45:02
In reply to Maispwi Well, it doesn't bode well with me at all...change that rule. It doesn't make sense. Toes should be on (at most) the popping crease as the ball is released. Full facting stop.
2019-08-23 21:48:26
In reply to BeatDball
His heel wasn't in contact with the ground
You don't know the front foot no-ball rule?
2019-08-23 22:13:32
In reply to BeatDball
lol, you grasping bro. Ball leaving the hand doan matter. 
2019-08-23 22:25:17
In reply to BeatDball
Couldn't believe the rubbish you were posting
2019-08-23 22:29:27
In reply to BeatDball
doesn't have to be grounded
2019-08-23 22:32:35
In reply to LBW375 Ok ok dr smarty pants! Foot does not touch popping crease - delivery, legal; front part touching/on popping crease - delivery, legal; so, if heel just touches popping crease, bowler is leaning over to carry momentum as he delivers ball & heel is no longer touching (but, initially did), then that delivery is legal!!?
2019-08-23 22:40:32
In reply to maj Thankx for making it concise. Lbwxyz is pulling a westdem on me!
Search
Live Scores
- no matches