Message Board Archives

President of Cricket West Indies (CWI) Ricky Skerritt could find himself before the Justice Winston Anderson-chaired CWI Ethics Committee after a report was submitted to the body accusing him of breaches of the CWI Code of Ethics as well as a violation of the memorandum of association.

The Gleaner has been reliably informed that Justice Anderson received a report in the form of a complaint from one of the CWI directors last week, outlining several issues tantamount to breaches of CWI’s Code of Ethics, stemming from the now-controversial PKF consultants Business Situation Assessment and Financial Report.

Contents of the complaint report, which was obtained by The Gleaner, state that Skerritt violated Article 102 of the memorandum of association, allegedly “entering into a contractual engagement with PKF without the prior knowledge, approval, or authorization of the CWI board of directors.”

Read more at The Jamaica Gleaner

Full Story

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com

This is so fact up.

The Big IDIOT continues to make trouble even after being categorically dumped by the WIBC electors over a year and one half ago.

Now, let's see whether he gets the WICB vote in his bid to chair the World Cricketing body, the ICC.

In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com

Is this an ethics issue or a breach of operational procedures?

In reply to camos

he breached operational procedures by not seeking the boards approval and acted unethically when he leaked the report to his cronies without giving Cameron an opportunity to respond to the "findings"

In reply to ponderiver

I see but the should start with the more egregious act, and then the ethics violation.

In reply to camos

more egregious!!!! seriously ???
Interesting point unfortunately he has shown a complete disregard for the procedures set out by his own board and furthermore he is the custodian of those rules

By his action at worst he has shown contempt for his own organisation at best you could say he had little faith in the board on matters that required confidentiality.

In either case by his actions his position becomes untenable. He has to go full stop....... should he remain in his position then a precedent will have been set

maybe he should put his hat in the ring to become ICC Chairman

In reply to ponderiver
Once again people are mistakingly assuming that President Skerritt must inform the ousted Cameron of the goings on at CWI.

Nothing can be further from the truth. The Director who is attempting to foment dissention within the ranks of CWI is a staunch supporter of the ousted individual.

This will come of nought.

In reply to Star

Are you saying if you have a writ against someone, he has no right to know?

Seems to me this is the violation we should worry about. The first thing we need to know is whether he has contracted with other entities without the knowledge and approval of his board.

In reply to Star

that he was devious in his actions would suggest that he cannot be trusted.

he bypassed the board and passed on confidential information huge breach
where is the dissension


He entered into a contractual arrangement with one of his pals ....... Red flag!!!!!
in any reputable organisation this would be considered fraudulent,he acted outside of his authority and hid his actions from his own board ........Red Flag
leaked info to news sources probably got paid...... Red Flag

He should be removed from office or at least suspended whilst an investigation takes place......... Under no circumstances should he be trusted.

The same goes for any board member who supports his actions or was privy to the action he took.

In reply to XDFIX

Is there a writ against Cameron?

In reply to ponderiver

How on earth is what you stated above relevant to your conclusion below. When did it become customary for a sitting President of an organisation to inform an ousted President of anything pertaining to the organisation he was ousted from?

You guys got this thing all wrong.

In reply to Star

Dude ,an entity does not need a board if the board does not provide oversight for acts of the president.

In reply to camos

yuh have time......

In reply to camos

Are you missing the point here? Why are you being so daft? The issue is with the following statement.



I refuse to engage any of you further if you all cannot understand that President Skerritt is not and was not in any way obligated to inform the person he defeated of anything pertaining to CWI.

If he did enter into a contractual arrangement with one of his pals then this is big time COI. He should be fired pronto ....

In reply to Star

Keep clutching at straws if thats the only point you have truck with

His actions have shown him to be deceitful and manipulative completely without honour He has to go

Buh Bye

In reply to ponderiver

The fat lady has not even started clearing her throat but you have already heard the singing.