It is by now well known that some of the greatest modern philosophers held racist views. John Locke (1632-1704), David Hume (1711-76), Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), G W F Hegel (1770-1831) and many others believed that Black and Indigenous peoples the world over were savage, inferior and in need of correction by European enlightenment. No serious philosopher today defends these explicitly racist views but, with good reason, they continue to study the writings of these authors. In order to hold on to the philosophical insights, scholars tend to make a distinction between the individual racism and the philosophical systems. Hegel might have been wrong for his racist writings about Africans and others, but that doesnt tell us anything about his speculative metaphysics
Or so the argument goes. But if we have learned anything about racism over the past few decades, it is that a focus on individual racist statements can obscure the ways in which racism continues to persist in systems. While laws in the United States, for example, may no longer overtly disenfranchise people of colour, they still enable oppression through mass incarceration. Is there any risk that something like this has happened in philosophy that in focusing on condemning the individual racism of philosophers we have allowed systemic philosophical racism to remain intact?
Lets consider in some detail the case of Hegel, arguably the creator of the most systematic philosophy in modern thought. Hegel certainly was an explicit racist. He believed, for example, that Black Africans were a race of children that remain immersed in a state of naiveté. He further wrote that Indigenous peoples lived in a condition of savagery and unfreedom. And in The Philosophy of Right (1821), he argued that there is a right of heroes to colonise these people in order to bring them into a progress of European enlightenment.
Lets consider in some detail the case of Hegel, arguably the creator of the most systematic philosophy in modern thought. Hegel certainly was an explicit racist. He believed, for example, that Black Africans were a race of children that remain immersed in a state of naiveté. He further wrote that Indigenous peoples lived in a condition of savagery and unfreedom. And in The Philosophy of Right (1821), he argued that there is a right of heroes to colonise these people in order to bring them into a progress of European enlightenment.
From this example, one might reasonably conclude that Hegels philosophical system couldnt have been racist. The critical theorist Susan Buck-Morss has gone so far as to argue that Hegel was writing the Haitian Revolution into his philosophy through the master-slave dialectic. Even if he held racist views, Hegels philosophical pursuit of truth led him to argue for universal justice through revolutionary struggle. If this is the case, then his philosophical system might reasonably be seen to contradict his racism. It is precisely because of such dissonance that commentators justify the distinction between Hegels explicit racism and the meaning of his philosophical system
This distinction breaks down, however, if we look more deeply into where Hegels idea of dialectics originated. In so doing, we will find that colonial racism directly informs the very concept of dialectics. Just like systemic racism in the world today, understanding the systemic racism of philosophy cannot be done by simply looking at a single individual or set of beliefs. We have to understand the historical context of ideas, how racism informed their genesis, and how that racism continues to structure our thinking today in ways that we might not fully realise.