Finally, the uncle whose dangerous pit bull beast, RIPPED THE LIFER OF HIS NIECE, that he left carelessly unattended, was charged for manslaughter.
Link Text
Message Board Archives
PIT BULL CHILD KILLING-UNCLE CHARGED FOR NEICE'S MAULING
In reply to Emir
Really sad! So sorry to hear.
--Æ.
That's why some places outlaw these dogs
In reply to Curtis
Exactly.
You have to design out the careless or stupid element.
Jailing this guy is not going to prevent another attack.
In reply to Halliwell
What do you mean 'design out'? Are you referring to the dogs, the owners, or both?
In reply to Halliwell
Well, in TnT there is an existing Dogs Control Act to deal with dangerous breeds. But it's only when an incident such as this takes place that the cobwebs are dusted off. There's little or no enforcement otherwise.
In reply to KTom
Design out meaning adding controls to prevent a repeat of the incident, and not hoping that another uncle is more careful.
Licensing certain breeds
Owners and premises assessments
Banning certain breeds
Public awareness programs
In reply to Halliwell
yeah, these dogs are just plain dangerous. You can own one or several for 10-20 years without any incidents but conversely you can adopt the most friendliest pitbull ever and despite how well you are trained to handle pitbulls, it could turn on you or a loved one in a heartbeat for no apparent reason.
In reply to Halliwell
The uncle's reckless disregard for the welfare of his flesh and blood in favor of a nasty beast of a dog is the problem. I want him to make jail.
Did you read the initial story of how the beast mauled the little girl? And how the uncle didn't return in 15 minutes to yank the dog off the child but it was too late then, of how the dog kept on eating the child' throat as onlookers try to intervene but the beast refused to budge.
In reply to Emir
And they have tons of people who would defend the actions of these dogs with their lives and proclaim "it's the owner's fault why the dog is like that".
Search
Live Scores
- no matches