debut: 2/16/17
35,068 runs
Is Putin a great leader and wise man, surpassing Western puppets?
NATO's assistance, particularly the provision of long-range missiles, aided the Ukrainians in achieving significant successes, including the retaking of the strategically crucial cities of Kharkiv and Kherson by the end of 2022. Western indecision, particularly from the Biden administration, in providing more weapons to Kyiv and Russia's establishment of strong defenses, including advanced electronic warfare systems, have led to a stalemate in the conflict. The military assistance that Ukraine obtained from the US and Britain at the beginning of the war significantly helped Kyiv resist the opening phase of Russia's "special military operation" led by Vladimir Putin in February 2022. The British Army's deployment of NLAW anti-tank missiles successfully hindered the Russian advancement towards the Ukrainian capital, where Putin intended to eliminate President Zelensky and install a pro-Moscow government in his stead. Refusing to send additional billions to Ukraine is not isolationism. Placing our needs as a priority does not entail abstaining from international obligations such as protecting nations we have treaties with the Budapest Memorandum.
That was a treaty between nations.
Ukraine relinquished its nuclear arsenal.
USSR promised not to use military force against Ukraine by entering into that pact.
The west promise not to advance towards the USSR.
Both blatantly breached the established deal.
The U.S. was a signatory to the deal and hence has a vested interest in Russia's actions against Ukraine.
Ukraine faced a serious situation, leading it to evacuate its forces from Avdiivka in the Donetsk region due to a lack of ammunition. The loss of Avdiivka, a crucial stronghold for Ukrainian forces since Russia's initial invasion of eastern Ukraine in 2014, is a significant setback. Production issues have impeded British efforts to supply Ukraine with 155mm artillery shells, the most sought-after ammunition in the conflict. Defense manufacturers are facing challenges in meeting the demand after Britain sent over 300,000 of the shells. Deficiencies in British armament production are also present in other European countries. The EU recently acknowledged that it cannot meet its commitment to supply Ukraine with 1 million artillery shells by March due to insufficient production capabilities. Not just Britain, but also the US, are unable to produce bullets effectively. The individuals who argue against providing financial help to Ukraine fail to recognize that the cash benefits American enterprises in 37 states that manufacture weaponry to replace those supplied to Ukraine for defense purposes. The funds are directed towards American corporations and employees within those corporations.
Russia made this a priority. Obese, sluggish military forces will not be effective in combat situations. The leadership responsible for the collapse of Afghanistan continues to oversee other military conflicts and capitulations. Russia has experienced a significant rise in weapons production over the previous two years, with defense spending estimated to be 7.5% of GDP. This surge followed Putin's directive to industrial leaders to focus on strengthening Russia's military capabilities. Trump cautioned NATO states to increase their contributions to the NATO budget and enhance their military capabilities to sustainable levels. However, they responded by laughing and ridiculing him, behaving as though the source of easy money would never run out. Europe must now make a decision regarding supporting a non-NATO Eastern European nation as outlined in the NATO alliance agreements, rather than expecting others to defend them.
One important military need for Ukraine is to have modern Western jets like US F-16s and additional long-range missiles. This will allow them to counter Russian forces well before they pose a danger to Ukraine's frontline defenses. Although Ukraine has received many offers for advanced pilot training and approximately 60 F-16s, the most recent Pentagon evaluation suggests that Ukrainian pilots are not expected to engage in F-16 combat missions against Russian targets until the end of the year. Referring to the F-16 as an advanced Western warplane is somewhat exaggerated. It is a jet that is nearly 40 years old. Considering Moscow's recent progress in fighting, the war may end in Russia's favor before Western armament is utilized, which should concern European leaders.
Despite their claims to be fighting Russian aggression, Europe is ill-equipped to deal with the threat Moscow poses. This is evident from Ukraine's struggling military effort. Putin will take heart from the fact that the West is not interested in fighting Russia, as he had anticipated when he initially decided to attack Ukraine. To prevent a fatal escalation of violence in Europe, the West must increase its efforts to supply Kyiv with the necessary weaponry to succeed in battle. Ukraine is not solely waging this war for its own survival. It is engaged in defending the whole Western alliance. I sympathize with the individuals in Ukraine. They are striving for their independence but have been let down by the western powers and mistreated by Putin. Watching Putin dominate the Ukrainians has now become a type of entertainment in the western world. Putin's objective is to regain authority over territories lost during the dissolution of the Soviet Union. When will he be stopped, if not now? This appears to be the contemporary American approach. Champion a righteous purpose and then forsake it.
Is Putin a great leader and wise man, surpassing Western puppets?
NATO's assistance, particularly the provision of long-range missiles, aided the Ukrainians in achieving significant successes, including the retaking of the strategically crucial cities of Kharkiv and Kherson by the end of 2022. Western indecision, particularly from the Biden administration, in providing more weapons to Kyiv and Russia's establishment of strong defenses, including advanced electronic warfare systems, have led to a stalemate in the conflict. The military assistance that Ukraine obtained from the US and Britain at the beginning of the war significantly helped Kyiv resist the opening phase of Russia's "special military operation" led by Vladimir Putin in February 2022. The British Army's deployment of NLAW anti-tank missiles successfully hindered the Russian advancement towards the Ukrainian capital, where Putin intended to eliminate President Zelensky and install a pro-Moscow government in his stead. Refusing to send additional billions to Ukraine is not isolationism. Placing our needs as a priority does not entail abstaining from international obligations such as protecting nations we have treaties with the Budapest Memorandum.
That was a treaty between nations.
Ukraine relinquished its nuclear arsenal.
USSR promised not to use military force against Ukraine by entering into that pact.
The west promise not to advance towards the USSR.
Both blatantly breached the established deal.
The U.S. was a signatory to the deal and hence has a vested interest in Russia's actions against Ukraine.
Ukraine faced a serious situation, leading it to evacuate its forces from Avdiivka in the Donetsk region due to a lack of ammunition. The loss of Avdiivka, a crucial stronghold for Ukrainian forces since Russia's initial invasion of eastern Ukraine in 2014, is a significant setback. Production issues have impeded British efforts to supply Ukraine with 155mm artillery shells, the most sought-after ammunition in the conflict. Defense manufacturers are facing challenges in meeting the demand after Britain sent over 300,000 of the shells. Deficiencies in British armament production are also present in other European countries. The EU recently acknowledged that it cannot meet its commitment to supply Ukraine with 1 million artillery shells by March due to insufficient production capabilities. Not just Britain, but also the US, are unable to produce bullets effectively. The individuals who argue against providing financial help to Ukraine fail to recognize that the cash benefits American enterprises in 37 states that manufacture weaponry to replace those supplied to Ukraine for defense purposes. The funds are directed towards American corporations and employees within those corporations.
Russia made this a priority. Obese, sluggish military forces will not be effective in combat situations. The leadership responsible for the collapse of Afghanistan continues to oversee other military conflicts and capitulations. Russia has experienced a significant rise in weapons production over the previous two years, with defense spending estimated to be 7.5% of GDP. This surge followed Putin's directive to industrial leaders to focus on strengthening Russia's military capabilities. Trump cautioned NATO states to increase their contributions to the NATO budget and enhance their military capabilities to sustainable levels. However, they responded by laughing and ridiculing him, behaving as though the source of easy money would never run out. Europe must now make a decision regarding supporting a non-NATO Eastern European nation as outlined in the NATO alliance agreements, rather than expecting others to defend them.
One important military need for Ukraine is to have modern Western jets like US F-16s and additional long-range missiles. This will allow them to counter Russian forces well before they pose a danger to Ukraine's frontline defenses. Although Ukraine has received many offers for advanced pilot training and approximately 60 F-16s, the most recent Pentagon evaluation suggests that Ukrainian pilots are not expected to engage in F-16 combat missions against Russian targets until the end of the year. Referring to the F-16 as an advanced Western warplane is somewhat exaggerated. It is a jet that is nearly 40 years old. Considering Moscow's recent progress in fighting, the war may end in Russia's favor before Western armament is utilized, which should concern European leaders.
Despite their claims to be fighting Russian aggression, Europe is ill-equipped to deal with the threat Moscow poses. This is evident from Ukraine's struggling military effort. Putin will take heart from the fact that the West is not interested in fighting Russia, as he had anticipated when he initially decided to attack Ukraine. To prevent a fatal escalation of violence in Europe, the West must increase its efforts to supply Kyiv with the necessary weaponry to succeed in battle. Ukraine is not solely waging this war for its own survival. It is engaged in defending the whole Western alliance. I sympathize with the individuals in Ukraine. They are striving for their independence but have been let down by the western powers and mistreated by Putin. Watching Putin dominate the Ukrainians has now become a type of entertainment in the western world. Putin's objective is to regain authority over territories lost during the dissolution of the Soviet Union. When will he be stopped, if not now? This appears to be the contemporary American approach. Champion a righteous purpose and then forsake it.
Is Putin a great leader and wise man, surpassing Western puppets?
- edited -
