I think the cogniscenti and cricket connossieurs on here would appreciate it
Batters mostly ran singles and twos
They took the time to build an innings
Not every ball was hit out the park. Very few in fact.
Even saw defensive strokes in the T20 format. This must have been thrilling for those aficionados.
Bowling was ok with no one that I saw having suspect actions.
Lots of “spinners” who weren’t afraid to flight the ball
Sometimes hard to tell the difference between some seamers and spinners…..but decent none the less.
The overall standard of fielding needs to improve. Hope Ms Henry is ok. There are some outstanding fielders (Dottin is an example) but for the most part, those I’ve seen have been very average.
All in all, a slower, more pedestrian and……dare I say…..geriatric style of play that is bound to excite those that long for “real cricket”.
Message Board Archives
My first time really watching women’s cricket
In reply to imusic
not a bad assessment
if you had a look at this team last year you might have been really disappointed
they have made a lot of strides esp on the fitness levels...
still work to do to get back to the 2016ish days
also you are looking at the NOT big 3 who either got knocked out or didn't make this round..they generally are a notch or 2 above the rest
In reply to doosra
I didn’t have much hope for them so they certainly exceeded my expectations.
But I was just going on past results. First time I’ve really seen our team in action.
Matthews and Dottin are several cuts above the rest. Didn’t see much of Taylor as I understand she too is or was in that category.
Of the others, Alleyne isn’t bad as a seamer. Ramharack is a decent spinner and not bad in the field.
But at this stage, it’s really a different game to the men. That true of most sports I guess.
In reply to imusic
they are going thru a transition phase from that 2016ish team
2 of the recent U19 players - James and Munisar are now making their way... Ramharack is now a settled fixture, replacing Anisa Mohammed, etc
Taylor has been carrying an injury or 2 for over a year now so you are not seeing her best. In this tournament she became only the 2nd woman to score 1000 WC runs...her intl record is excellent
And yes Dottin and Hayley are as good as any you'd find around the world.
There are several good young spinners coming thru the age group. What they need is a nextgen of Taylors, Matthews, Dottins, that is a hard one but fingers crossed
In reply to imusic
A really good assessment
I owe a Dottin an apology. I wanted to know how she walked right back in after a two year absence. She showed me why.
In reply to Chrissy
WHEN WERE U\YOU RIGHT TWISSY?
DEDING WID LAF ON TWISSY FACE.,.
In reply to imusic
For awhile with all the diving taking place, in the men game, on the football field, the women game was much more attractive in every sense of the word.
Are you sure, sure, sure you didn't watch 2016 final when WI were double Champs and women's game was just before the men? Sure?
In reply to doosra
I was surprised to see Taylor in the X1 after she retired while batting earlier in the tournament.
This format needs fit players.
In reply to imusic
you might appreciate this article a little bit
In reply to openning
she is a fighter...she is now 32 and with better health she still has much to offer, especially at this transitional stage
In reply to doosra
This is sports, not a Desk job.
Do you say an injured Taylor is better than the player she replaced?
Leave age and experience out of the conversation. From the time I saw her hobbling on the field earlier in the tournament and then opening the inning, I wondered what the hell was going on.
If you tell me, that Taylor, on one leg, is better than most of the other players, I would say you watched many blind people matches.
In reply to openning
yes to Taylor being better than anyone on the sidelines - Gajnabi, et al...
once she is fit to some extent she is still better than most in the WI
and why can she not aspire to greater fitness now? 32 is no age , it is the peak for many
In reply to doosra
There was a match in which Taylor was hobbling on the field; she was replaced, then opened the inning, and had to retire.
She was a cheerleader in the next match, then returned to the starting X1 with the same injury.
That selection makes absolutely no sense.
In reply to doosra
Thanks Doosie
In reply to openning
She is sure as hell better than Nation (no.spring chicken herself) and that's even if she lost a whole leg
In reply to openning
Same injury, different stage of healing. Basic commonsense. We didn't need the commies to mention she was moving better, we saw it. Shemar bowled down Oz with the same injury...treated and 1 day later. Yuh smarter than that
In reply to openning
Women also swing the ball more than men
In reply to spider
That makes some sense. They bowl a lot slower than men which gives the ball time to swing
In reply to imusic
The ball is also lighter than the one men use
In reply to spider
Didnt know that. Thanks
In reply to iTito
Excellent observation there Tito boy!
In reply to SnoopDog
T&T nursery rhyme by Sparrow the famous Grenedian story teller
(Ten to one is murder!)
But ah get away; and ah run, till ah reach Johnson corner
(Ten to one is murder!)
They take off in meh skin with big stick an' boulder
(Ten to one is murder!)
The fella in front was a very good pelter
(Ten to one is murder!)
Was SN around then? Were women playing cricket at international level?
In reply to doosra
I listened to a radio show last evening with the captain. One topic discussed was fitness and dot balls.
In any T20 match, a player who cannot run quick singles or is unable to chase balls has no right to be selected.
None of our ladies is in the class of Viv, Lara or the greatest.
After seeing Taylor fielding earlier in the series, I maintained that having to leave the field, return to open, retire because of that same injury, and be selected for with that same injury makes absolutely no sense.
Search
Live Scores
- no matches